Heather Mills McCartney

[kinboshi]

HMM got Paul M on a grief stricken rebound, Dis she capitalise on it, you bet, she got knocked up as fast as poss, moved in, got her foot under the table and played house till she knew she could hear the kerching.

I said from day one when Paul started dating/seeing/having it off with HMM that it would end in tears and she would be minted because of it.

BTW there was a massive tell in the whole affair, She's much younger than him and he was feeling sad and lonely at the time.

I will say our press have done a bang up job of stirring the pot as usual.

[Acidmouse]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMwAZ0k65Po

sums it all up.

[boldie]

who gives a flying F...really. Remember..just because the Sun tells you to care it doesn't mean you actually have to.. Have a mind..and life..of your own and stop reading shitty gossip.

blah...I really hate this celebrity culture.

[Claw75]

who gives a flying F...really. Remember..just because the Sun tells you to care it doesn't mean you actually have to.. Have a mind..and life..of your own and stop reading shitty gossip.

blah...I really hate this celebrity culture.

    The Sun is rubbish for celebrity gossip...Heat magazine is the bible.

[kinboshi]

who gives a flying F...really. Remember..just because the Sun tells you to care it doesn't mean you actually have to.. Have a mind..and life..of your own and stop reading shitty gossip.

blah...I really hate this celebrity culture.

Yeah me too!   

That bloody Ed again .

[SuffolkPunch]

The pr0n story and other ones about her have been going around for years, no one actually printed the stories though. They were only kept under the lid because she was protected by Paul and his ability to sue the ass of anyone, no paper wanted to destroy his good image or thier's on bitter legal disputes.

As soon as she was not under his protection it was open season, she started the media circus trying to get a positive slant with the public just as they broke up, paul reacted and did the same thing and they both look like losers.

Just watch the documentary about her that was on ch4 or ch5 last year, its obvious shes a gold digger who has a colourful past who will do anything for the $

The porn rumours were around for years, but there was no proof. I was involved in getting that porn story in The Sun last year (her sensational nude shots in the dodgy German book), and believe me, we had not been sitting on it for years! If we had it years before, there is no doubt we would have published it years before.

[kinboshi]

The pr0n story and other ones about her have been going around for years, no one actually printed the stories though. They were only kept under the lid because she was protected by Paul and his ability to sue the ass of anyone, no paper wanted to destroy his good image or thier's on bitter legal disputes.

As soon as she was not under his protection it was open season, she started the media circus trying to get a positive slant with the public just as they broke up, paul reacted and did the same thing and they both look like losers.

Just watch the documentary about her that was on ch4 or ch5 last year, its obvious shes a gold digger who has a colourful past who will do anything for the $

The porn rumours were around for years, but there was no proof. I was involved in getting that porn story in The Sun last year (her sensational nude shots in the dodgy German book), and believe me, we had not been sitting on it for years! If we had it years before, there is no doubt we would have published it years before.

Or made it up.

[boldie]

The pr0n story and other ones about her have been going around for years, no one actually printed the stories though. They were only kept under the lid because she was protected by Paul and his ability to sue the ass of anyone, no paper wanted to destroy his good image or thier's on bitter legal disputes.

As soon as she was not under his protection it was open season, she started the media circus trying to get a positive slant with the public just as they broke up, paul reacted and did the same thing and they both look like losers.

Just watch the documentary about her that was on ch4 or ch5 last year, its obvious shes a gold digger who has a colourful past who will do anything for the $

The porn rumours were around for years, but there was no proof. I was involved in getting that porn story in The Sun last year (her sensational nude shots in the dodgy German book), and believe me, we had not been sitting on it for years! If we had it years before, there is no doubt we would have published it years before.

Or made it up.

Well..the "no doubt we would have published it years before part" is a bit...erm..open to debate if nothing else. The Sun (and many other tabloids) has been known to have sat on stories for years when it suited them before just waiting for a good opportunity to stick it to someone when their agenda changed.
I personally still don't care about what the Sun says about someone and half of the stuff they post is simplistic scaremongering and sensationalism, journalism of the lowest order (well, the Mail is of course the lowest) and it's sad that soomany people read this stuff and consider it news.

[kinboshi]

I agree with the short German hippy

[HOLDorFOLD]

The pr0n story and other ones about her have been going around for years, no one actually printed the stories though. They were only kept under the lid because she was protected by Paul and his ability to sue the ass of anyone, no paper wanted to destroy his good image or thier's on bitter legal disputes.

As soon as she was not under his protection it was open season, she started the media circus trying to get a positive slant with the public just as they broke up, paul reacted and did the same thing and they both look like losers.

Just watch the documentary about her that was on ch4 or ch5 last year, its obvious shes a gold digger who has a colourful past who will do anything for the $

The porn rumours were around for years, but there was no proof. I was involved in getting that porn story in The Sun last year (her sensational nude shots in the dodgy German book), and believe me, we had not been sitting on it for years! If we had it years before, there is no doubt we would have published it years before.

Or made it up.

Well..the "no doubt we would have published it years before part" is a bit...erm..open to debate if nothing else. The Sun (and many other tabloids) has been known to have sat on stories for years when it suited them before just waiting for a good opportunity to stick it to someone when their agenda changed.
I personally still don't care about what the Sun says about someone and half of the stuff they post is simplistic scaremongering and sensationalism, journalism of the lowest order (well, the Mail is of course the lowest) and it's sad that soomany people read this stuff and consider it news.

Fact - The Mirror had stories all typeset and laid out in advance. All they had to do was re-jigging when the story was "ready" to be broken.  A lot of the 'last minute' exclusives are never last minute.

[SuffolkPunch]

The pr0n story and other ones about her have been going around for years, no one actually printed the stories though. They were only kept under the lid because she was protected by Paul and his ability to sue the ass of anyone, no paper wanted to destroy his good image or thier's on bitter legal disputes.

As soon as she was not under his protection it was open season, she started the media circus trying to get a positive slant with the public just as they broke up, paul reacted and did the same thing and they both look like losers.

Just watch the documentary about her that was on ch4 or ch5 last year, its obvious shes a gold digger who has a colourful past who will do anything for the $

The porn rumours were around for years, but there was no proof. I was involved in getting that porn story in The Sun last year (her sensational nude shots in the dodgy German book), and believe me, we had not been sitting on it for years! If we had it years before, there is no doubt we would have published it years before.

Or made it up.

Well..the "no doubt we would have published it years before part" is a bit...erm..open to debate if nothing else. The Sun (and many other tabloids) has been known to have sat on stories for years when it suited them before just waiting for a good opportunity to stick it to someone when their agenda changed.
I personally still don't care about what the Sun says about someone and half of the stuff they post is simplistic scaremongering and sensationalism, journalism of the lowest order (well, the Mail is of course the lowest) and it's sad that soomany people read this stuff and consider it news.

LOL. And one wonders why the Guardian and Independent get such a low readership.

[Claw75]

LOL. And one wonders why the Guardian and Independent get such a low readership.

among the population as a whole, perhaps, but if you were to carry out a survey of, for example, my network of friends, you'd find a lot more guardian/independent readers among them than people who read the tabloids. 

I'm trying to be careful what I say here, because I don't want to look like an intellectual snob, but I agree 100% with what Boldie is saying.  Whilst most of us here on blonde would have the intelligence to read an article and take it with a pinch of salt, there are an alarming number of people that take what's printed in the tabloids as gospel - the amount of conversations I've had with my nan where she's told me all about the awful things so and so has been up to (which she read about in the Sun or the News of the World).  She doesn't even say 'i read in the paper', it's to be taken at face value as far as she is concerned. 

I find it all very scary to be honest, but whose responsibility is it really?  Do we blame the government for failing to educate us properly to make us more discerning? I don't know.  There's a huge market for the tabloids (which is evident from the sales figures, as Simon pointed out). 

sorry, that turned into another one of my nonsense waffles

[TightEnd]

I'm with you Claw

Independent and The Times every day for me

Economist, Spectator and Private Eye too


I do despair at the tabloids and the stuff that they go with

but then I despair at Heat/OK/Hello and the like too

[Claw75]

leave Heat out of this Tighty - I stand by my earlier comments.  it's my embarrassing vice actually.

[TightEnd]

leave Heat out of this Tighty - I stand by my earlier comments.  it's my embarrassing vice actually.

understood

what complete tat though

to see the likes of Kerry Katona make fortunes out of no talent whatsoever because of these sorts of publications is embarassing