Stats reliant decision...

[thetank]

This would usually be a standard pass, but villain has stats of 36/30 with a 3bet of 25% over a sample of 32 hands. I realise this is a small sample, and sometimes this can be deceptive.

yeah sample is way too small to flick it in here

Thread about this

http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=10933141&an=0&page=0#Post10933141

Good post that

Cliffnotes...

If random is playing like a crazy but you've only seen him for one orbit, proceed as if 80% of the time he is a crazy and only 20% is he a normal player on a good run of cards.

Summating quote...

" I could have used several different situations or tweaked different variables, but still arrived at the same general point: lots of aggression in a small sample size can be surprisingly significant data, and we can't afford to ignore it. "

[salfi]

i have many more then 6 hands on the villain and a few showdowns. evidence suggests fist pump moonwalk bite hand off jaws style.

[LuckyLloyd]

This would usually be a standard pass, but villain has stats of 36/30 with a 3bet of 25% over a sample of 32 hands. I realise this is a small sample, and sometimes this can be deceptive.

yeah sample is way too small to flick it in here

Thread about this

http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=10933141&an=0&page=0#Post10933141

Fair play.

[MC]

This would usually be a standard pass, but villain has stats of 36/30 with a 3bet of 25% over a sample of 32 hands. I realise this is a small sample, and sometimes this can be deceptive.

yeah sample is way too small to flick it in here

Thread about this

http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=10933141&an=0&page=0#Post10933141

Good post that

Cliffnotes...

If random is playing like a crazy but you've only seen him for one orbit, proceed as if 80% of the time he is a crazy and only 20% is he a normal player on a good run of cards.

Summating quote...

" I could have used several different situations or tweaked different variables, but still arrived at the same general point: lots of aggression in a small sample size can be surprisingly significant data, and we can't afford to ignore it. "

+1, thanks for that link double up, good summation tank

lol@moonwalk call, that's a new one for me