poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
April 18, 2024, 10:49:56 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2272534
Posts in
66754
Topics by
16946
Members
Latest Member:
KobeTaylor
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Live poker
Live Tournament Staking
Staking Thread caveats - debate thread.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
17
18
19
20
[
21
]
Author
Topic: Staking Thread caveats - debate thread. (Read 43635 times)
neeko
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1762
Re: Staking Thread caveats - debate thread.
«
Reply #300 on:
May 28, 2012, 09:30:49 AM »
IMO the clause is valid, better said up front than not, if the reduction in markup is less than the cost of the clause then don't buy.
I thought there was only one thread that policed people out of the discussion - even is you wanted to make a scientific point on the MMR thread you couldnt if you didn't have a kid.
Logged
There is no problem so bad that a politician cant make it worse.
http://www.dec.org.uk
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5483
Re: Staking Thread caveats - debate thread.
«
Reply #301 on:
May 28, 2012, 06:31:46 PM »
How would people feel if a horse bought back action then resold to another investor? I think this caveat is fine. Mantis makes a point but as long as it is in the open then no big deal.
Logged
[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
Simon Galloway
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4173
Re: Staking Thread caveats - debate thread.
«
Reply #302 on:
May 28, 2012, 06:33:10 PM »
How does a horse feel if an investor re-sells the action?
Logged
https://www.rocketmiles.com/refer/SIMONGALLOWAY22
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5483
Re: Staking Thread caveats - debate thread.
«
Reply #303 on:
May 28, 2012, 06:39:36 PM »
Good point, happened to me once and I had no problem, slightly different situation though. Does a horse have a right to buy his action back at anytime? What if he just refuses to play, not much you can do. A lot of clauses require a deeper level of trust but it is a part of staking.
As far as policing posts is concerned, I believe no member has a right to say what is acceptable unless they believe a scam is taking place. If they link it is poor value deal they shouldn't. The marketplace should decide
Logged
[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
Pages:
1
...
17
18
19
20
[
21
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...