|
RED-DOG
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: May 31, 2012, 09:47:38 PM » |
|
Hmmmm. Could be wrong.
Are you sure this is possible Mr Flyn?
If it isn't and you're wasting my time I'll smash your teeth in.
Please smash his teeth in anyway. Go on, you know it makes sense. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The older I get, the better I was.
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
|
« Reply #31 on: May 31, 2012, 09:53:18 PM » |
|
222432 ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
|
EvilPie
|
|
« Reply #32 on: May 31, 2012, 09:59:42 PM » |
|
222432 ?
Mole's reply...... 434321 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Motivational speeches at their best:
"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
|
« Reply #33 on: May 31, 2012, 10:01:52 PM » |
|
222432 ?
Mole's reply...... 434321 up yours moley. i'm more determined than ever to catch the little bugger now. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
|
« Reply #34 on: May 31, 2012, 10:42:19 PM » |
|
right Mr Mole. how about?
224234 ??
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
|
kinboshi
|
|
« Reply #35 on: May 31, 2012, 10:49:48 PM » |
|
right Mr Mole. how about?
224234 ??
432123... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
|
« Reply #36 on: May 31, 2012, 10:50:49 PM » |
|
right Mr Mole. how about?
224234 ??
432123... he's really pissing me off now |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
|
smashedagain
|
|
« Reply #37 on: June 01, 2012, 12:14:42 AM » |
|
right Mr Mole. how about?
224234 ??
432123... he's really pissing me off now Lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
[ ] ept title
[ ] wpt title
[ ] wsop braclet
[X] mickey mouse hoodies
|
|
|
|
Cf
|
|
« Reply #38 on: June 01, 2012, 12:43:47 AM » |
|
Evilpies effort and approach was definitely along the right lines.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Blue text
|
|
|
|
Waz1892
|
|
« Reply #39 on: June 01, 2012, 12:50:37 AM » |
|
4 4 3 2 1
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Carpe Diem
|
|
|
|
EvilPie
|
|
« Reply #40 on: June 01, 2012, 12:53:40 AM » |
|
4 4 3 2 1
Moley's reply........ 2 3 2 3 2 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Motivational speeches at their best:
"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
|
|
|
|
EvilPie
|
|
« Reply #41 on: June 01, 2012, 12:55:23 AM » |
|
Got it. Won't spoil it though.
Good one CF.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Motivational speeches at their best:
"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
|
|
|
|
WotRTheChances
|
|
« Reply #42 on: June 01, 2012, 01:24:13 AM » |
|
2,3,4,2,3,4
Hitting 2 first proves the mole didnt start at 2
Hitting 3 proves it couldnt have started at 4 and gone to 3
Hitting 4 proves it could not have started at 4, because it would have had to have gone to 5 and be back at 4
Hitting 2 will kill the mole if it started on an odd number mole-hill and has gone to 2 (the obv cycle odd->even->odd)
Hitting 3 will kill the mole if it was at 4 (it has to have been if we didnt kill it at 2 or in any previous step) and has gone to 3
Hitting 4 kills the mole if it had gone to 4 from 5 (which it will have to have done if still alive)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
zerofive
|
|
« Reply #43 on: June 01, 2012, 01:26:27 AM » |
|
Tom High wastes no time in spoiling it. Works backwards and inverse as well for the same reason.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
WotRTheChances
|
|
« Reply #44 on: June 01, 2012, 01:28:26 AM » |
|
Tom High wastes no time in spoiling it. Works backwards and inverse as well for the same reason.
Is it correct? Just spent a few mins mulling it over. If you go proving not odds 1st (as I did) it takes 7. Wasnt sure if it was waterproof |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author