Stars Backing for Sunday

[pleno1]

over last few weeks there has been  INSANE value, same as the sunday 530.

[skolsuper]

over last few weeks there has been  INSANE value, same as the sunday 530.

OK fair enough, and the bankroll part is not a concern to dreenie if she's asking for 100% backing. Would not give the same advice to other people playing on their own tho, the 100r is usually v tough and always massive variance.

[pleno1]

over last few weeks there has been  INSANE value, same as the sunday 530.

OK fair enough, and the bankroll part is not a concern to dreenie if she's asking for 100% backing. Would not give the same advice to other people playing on their own tho, the 100r is usually v tough and always massive variance.

agree entirely, just think for last 2-3 weeks and this sunday its good value and obv great guarantees still.

what do you think abut adding low variance comps such as 20fos and small rebuy guarantees alongside million/warm up etc.

argument is helping variance vs screen space + potentially tilt.

[outragous76]

@dreenie, v good staking proposal, glglgl

no graphs or links and charging a mark up - i got caned for that

good to see you are consistant

I took it to mean she was a decent prospect with a probable return on investment Guy

This.

And pleno playing the 100r at all is a bad idea for most players due to skill and/or bankroll limitations.

Oh so you just have free reign to insult who you wish on the staking boards then?

I see

Cool

[The Camel]

shipped

[pleno1]

no value in 100 2r 1a tournaments, everybody is solid..


PokerStars Hand #83329945399: Tournament #589010766, $100+$9 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level X (100/200) - 2012/07/15 1:40:59 CET [2012/07/14 19:40:59 ET]
Table '589010766 5' 9-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: PokerGentIy (4838 in chips)
Seat 2: floridian970 (2900 in chips)
Seat 3: NygaardP (22529 in chips)
Seat 4: pads1161 (16906 in chips)
Seat 5: Achiles12 (12385 in chips)
Seat 7: GolD247 (2984 in chips)
Seat 8: diegokeep (7179 in chips)
Seat 9: CutiePi314 (8598 in chips)
PokerGentIy: posts the ante 25
floridian970: posts the ante 25
NygaardP: posts the ante 25
pads1161: posts the ante 25
Achiles12: posts the ante 25
GolD247: posts the ante 25
diegokeep: posts the ante 25
CutiePi314: posts the ante 25
Achiles12: posts small blind 100
GolD247: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to pads1161 [ ]
diegokeep: folds
CutiePi314: folds
PokerGentIy: raises 200 to 400
floridian970: calls 400
NygaardP: calls 400
pads1161: raises 1200 to 1600
Achiles12: folds
GolD247: folds
PokerGentIy: folds
floridian970: calls 1200
NygaardP: calls 1200
*** FLOP *** [ ]
floridian970: bets 1275 and is all-in
NygaardP: calls 1275
pads1161: calls 1275
*** TURN *** [ ] []
NygaardP: checks
pads1161: checks
*** RIVER *** [ ] []
NygaardP: checks
pads1161: checks
*** SHOW DOWN ***
floridian970: shows [ ] (a pair of Sevens)
NygaardP: mucks hand
pads1161: shows [ ] (a pair of Sevens - Ace kicker)
pads1161 collected 9525 from pot
floridian970 finished the tournament in 31st place
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 9525 | Rake 0
Board [ ]
Seat 1: PokerGentIy folded before Flop
Seat 2: floridian970 showed [ ] and lost with a pair of Sevens
Seat 3: NygaardP mucked [ ]
Seat 4: pads1161 (button) showed [ ] and won (9525) with a pair of Sevens
Seat 5: Achiles12 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 7: GolD247 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 8: diegokeep folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: CutiePi314 folded before Flop (didn't bet)

[dreenie]

@dreenie, v good staking proposal, glglgl

no graphs or links and charging a mark up - i got caned for that

good to see you are consistant

I had originally stated the reasons why I needed 100% of the backing. I would not continuously ask for a deal like this, and I have also stated that if we are to win a decent amount of $$ I will do a package that I put X amount of $$ in and give original backers a 1st refusal on buying a piece @spot.

As for the links, :

http://www.officialpokerrankings.com/pokerstars/dreeniee82/poker/results/C9639D394DFB4FF9A192D142D14DE2B5.html?t=2

As u can see for 2012 I am currently losing, however in the last 3 years have won money, and yes 2011 half of the winnings I made was for 2nd in Wcoop. This year I have been struggling a lot, my volume has been very low, I have not had enough funds to play what I want, and I will openly admit that I haven't played to the best of my ability for them reasons, I have also run on the wrong side of variance imho.

I do get staked for Ipoker & Microgaming which I have been for the last 14 months with a company called Bankroll Supply. I have obviously put in much mroe volume for them, and most recently got myself out of a large make up hole.

Sharkscope :
Micro - dreeniee 82 & Ladbrokes - dreeniee82
Ipoker - dreeniee822

I have tried to be as honest as I can where this staking proposal is concerned and I will be giving 100%.

Thanks for all the gl wishes.

Dreenie

[pleno1]

guy wasnt having a go at you dreenie.

i know you know this, but just making sure

if claypole cant get funds to you lmk and i'll send

[dreenie]

guy wasnt having a go at you dreenie.

i know you know this, but just making sure

if claypole cant get funds to you lmk and i'll send

Claypole sent it OK now, everyone has paid, and we are good to go tomorrow thank you.

gl if you play Pleno

[skolsuper]

@dreenie, v good staking proposal, glglgl

no graphs or links and charging a mark up - i got caned for that

good to see you are consistant

I took it to mean she was a decent prospect with a probable return on investment Guy

This.

And pleno playing the 100r at all is a bad idea for most players due to skill and/or bankroll limitations.

Oh so you just have free reign to insult who you wish on the staking boards then?

I see

Cool

Without wanting to resort to ad hominem attacks, I think it is relevant enough to point out that all of your staking threads have predictably turned to shit, and not just results-wise but also in your behaviour and attitude, so maybe you do need a bit more policing than most.

Tbh yes your original complaint is probably fair, maybe I haven't been consistent, but I like dreenie and couldn't say anything mean to her, she has a heart of gold, underneath.

[buzzharvey22]

hope dreeniee wins the mirrion me like

[millidonk]

Woah, Keys, If you take it upon yourself to police the staking boards (which I actually like as It has stopped loads of bad proposals going up IMO) you need to do it fairly and consitently. If you rip one person for no graphs or whatever, then don't even mention it on someone else's because you like them more, that just fuels the blonde clique argument and you are basically just being a troll.

Think your reply to Guy is pretty out of order tbh and thought you were more classy than that.

Apologies for derail Dreenie, win the world!

[treefella]

Love that I get involved in my first staking thread and a load of shite kicks up. Keep it coming lol. Dreenie we don't care bout graphs and markup just do a win tonight eh . Glglgl  . Were all just gamblers here taking a spin of the wheel : )

[MANTIS01]

@dreenie, v good staking proposal, glglgl

no graphs or links and charging a mark up - i got caned for that

good to see you are consistant

I took it to mean she was a decent prospect with a probable return on investment Guy

This.

And pleno playing the 100r at all is a bad idea for most players due to skill and/or bankroll limitations.

Oh so you just have free reign to insult who you wish on the staking boards then?

I see

Cool

Without wanting to resort to ad hominem attacks, I think it is relevant enough to point out that all of your staking threads have predictably turned to shit, and not just results-wise but also in your behaviour and attitude, so maybe you do need a bit more policing than most.

Tbh yes your original complaint is probably fair, maybe I haven't been consistent, but I like dreenie and couldn't say anything mean to her, she has a heart of gold, underneath.

Takes the biscuit how you can chastise another member for shit behaviour and attitude and in the same post state you are a biased policeman. That sort of behaviour takes the most policing of all. I would say you are very consistent thou, esp in manipulating this board to suit your own personal preferences. The fact is your opinion will always lack credibility because of it.

Sorry dreenie, you come across well, vbol.

[DMorgan]

Professional poker player in 'not being a saint' shocker.

gl dreenie + backers