poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
May 17, 2024, 03:12:22 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2272686
Posts in
66756
Topics by
16948
Members
Latest Member:
callpri
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
A Taxing debate
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
9
10
11
12
[
13
]
14
15
16
17
...
22
Author
Topic: A Taxing debate (Read 40175 times)
AlunB
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1712
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #180 on:
September 25, 2014, 09:14:48 PM »
Really disagree with this logic honeybadger. All businesses (or self employed people) pay large amounts of money to other businesses who also pay corporation tax. The situation of the pro gambler is not unique in this respect at all. It's just more directly obvious.
As honeybadger rightly points out in certain limited circumstances (live gaming) there is an almost punitive tax rate but that doesn't stop the companies wanting to open more casinos. That is their business cost and relates to them not you. It has nothing to do with your personal liability. It's a logical fallacy to connect the two imo.
Should people working for freight companies not pay tax as their company already pays so much indirect tax when buying fuel? Should a cab driver?
Just for the record the tax on online gambling really isn't going to be that high and currently is absurdly low for most companies. And betfair really doesn't pay that much corporation tax. It only made £60m profit last year.
Logged
Honeybadger
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1926
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #181 on:
September 25, 2014, 09:38:52 PM »
Quote from: AlunB on September 25, 2014, 09:14:48 PM
Really disagree with this logic honeybadger. All businesses (or self employed people) pay large amounts of money to other businesses who also pay corporation tax. The situation of the pro gambler is not unique in this respect at all. It's just more directly obvious.
As honeybadger rightly points out in certain limited circumstances (live gaming) there is an almost punitive tax rate but that doesn't stop the companies wanting to open more casinos. That is their business cost and relates to them not you. It has nothing to do with your personal liability. It's a logical fallacy to connect the two imo.
Should people working for freight companies not pay tax as their company already pays so much indirect tax when buying fuel? Should a cab driver?
Just for the record the tax on online gambling really isn't going to be that high and currently is absurdly low for most companies. And betfair really doesn't pay that much corporation tax. It only made £60m profit last year.
Tbh, I am not 100% behind the argument anyway. However, I believe there is some validity in it - mainly when applied to the very unfair punitive tax laws that apply in, for example, live poker at a casino or DTD.
Logged
Honeybadger
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1926
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #182 on:
September 25, 2014, 09:40:37 PM »
Also, I think I should start voluntarily paying my National Insurance every year. Seems the right thing to do IMO. Anyone know how I go about paying it?
Logged
AlunB
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1712
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #183 on:
September 25, 2014, 09:41:37 PM »
Quote from: Honeybadger on September 25, 2014, 09:38:52 PM
Quote from: AlunB on September 25, 2014, 09:14:48 PM
Really disagree with this logic honeybadger. All businesses (or self employed people) pay large amounts of money to other businesses who also pay corporation tax. The situation of the pro gambler is not unique in this respect at all. It's just more directly obvious.
As honeybadger rightly points out in certain limited circumstances (live gaming) there is an almost punitive tax rate but that doesn't stop the companies wanting to open more casinos. That is their business cost and relates to them not you. It has nothing to do with your personal liability. It's a logical fallacy to connect the two imo.
Should people working for freight companies not pay tax as their company already pays so much indirect tax when buying fuel? Should a cab driver?
Just for the record the tax on online gambling really isn't going to be that high and currently is absurdly low for most companies. And betfair really doesn't pay that much corporation tax. It only made £60m profit last year.
Tbh, I am not 100% behind the argument anyway. However, I believe there is some validity in it - mainly when applied to the very unfair punitive tax laws that apply in, for example, live poker at a casino or DTD.
Yes I suspect you are probably right in that there is a narrow set of circumstances where it has some merit. But not much
Logged
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17523
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #184 on:
September 25, 2014, 09:56:07 PM »
Quote from: Honeybadger on September 25, 2014, 09:40:37 PM
Also, I think I should start voluntarily paying my National Insurance every year. Seems the right thing to do IMO. Anyone know how I go about paying it?
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/ni/volcontr/basics.htm
It's about £600 / year for me.
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
vegaslover
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4618
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #185 on:
September 25, 2014, 11:45:42 PM »
Obv nothing to do with income tax, but poker players stil paying for local services via their council tax payments
Logged
arbboy
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13285
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #186 on:
September 25, 2014, 11:55:49 PM »
Quote from: vegaslover on September 25, 2014, 11:45:42 PM
Obv nothing to do with income tax, but poker players stil paying for local services via their council tax payments
only income tax matters on this thread! Other taxes don't count. It's a lefties thread. If you earn £60k a year on benefits though u get this paid for you (thanks to Blair and Brown's kindness for 13 years towards those who love the play the system for the max - you might even get to live in Mayfair or Westminster on the state as well even though no one in the real world can afford such luxuries) for free via other tax payers (professional gamblers do pay council tax alongside every other tax apart from income tax) and don't have to pay income tax on your income (benefits) before you pay it out of your net income.
«
Last Edit: September 26, 2014, 12:13:38 AM by arbboy
»
Logged
redsimon
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8706
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #187 on:
September 26, 2014, 12:19:44 AM »
Quote from: arbboy on September 25, 2014, 11:55:49 PM
Quote from: vegaslover on September 25, 2014, 11:45:42 PM
Obv nothing to do with income tax, but poker players stil paying for local services via their council tax payments
only income tax matters on this thread! Other taxes don't count. It's a lefties thread. If you earn £60k a year on benefits though u get this paid for you (thanks to Blair and Brown's kindness for 13 years towards those who love the play the system for the max - you might even get to live in Mayfair or Westminster on the state as well even though no one in the real world can afford such luxuries) for free via other tax payers (professional gamblers do pay council tax alongside every other tax apart from income tax) and don't have to pay income tax on your income (benefits) before you pay it out of your net income.
isn't the benefit cap 25k per year? Where do you get 60k from?
Logged
Success has many parents but failure is an orphan
http://www.organdonation.nhs.uk
arbboy
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13285
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #188 on:
September 26, 2014, 12:20:43 AM »
Quote from: redsimon on September 26, 2014, 12:19:44 AM
Quote from: arbboy on September 25, 2014, 11:55:49 PM
Quote from: vegaslover on September 25, 2014, 11:45:42 PM
Obv nothing to do with income tax, but poker players stil paying for local services via their council tax payments
only income tax matters on this thread! Other taxes don't count. It's a lefties thread. If you earn £60k a year on benefits though u get this paid for you (thanks to Blair and Brown's kindness for 13 years towards those who love the play the system for the max - you might even get to live in Mayfair or Westminster on the state as well even though no one in the real world can afford such luxuries) for free via other tax payers (professional gamblers do pay council tax alongside every other tax apart from income tax) and don't have to pay income tax on your income (benefits) before you pay it out of your net income.
isn't the benefit cap 25k per year? Where do you get 60k from?
It has been £25k since 2010. Before that anything goes. Hence why the country is skint! This is a grossed up figure as well just for clarity of what people would have to earn in a real job to 'take home' the benefits they do to pay for the services/rent they do. Even at a cap of £25k a year the real cap is in excess of £35k in real gross wages earned in order for them to receive £25k net.
«
Last Edit: September 26, 2014, 12:23:27 AM by arbboy
»
Logged
AlunB
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1712
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #189 on:
September 26, 2014, 12:23:08 AM »
Quote from: arbboy on September 25, 2014, 11:55:49 PM
Quote from: vegaslover on September 25, 2014, 11:45:42 PM
Obv nothing to do with income tax, but poker players stil paying for local services via their council tax payments
only income tax matters on this thread! Other taxes don't count. It's a lefties thread. If you earn £60k a year on benefits though u get this paid for you (thanks to Blair and Brown's kindness for 13 years towards those who love the play the system for the max - you might even get to live in Mayfair or Westminster on the state as well even though no one in the real world can afford such luxuries) for free via other tax payers (professional gamblers do pay council tax alongside every other tax apart from income tax) and don't have to pay income tax on your income (benefits) before you pay it out of your net income.
Except of course absolutely nobody is saying that.
And we are talking about income tax (and NI) as these are the taxes gamblers don't pay. Not a great deal of point discussing the taxes we all do pay.
If someone is earning £60k in benefits then of course they should pay tax on it. Although it would make a lot more sense to simply reduce the benefit amount at source.
Afaik the Tories brought in a benefit cap so nobody is earning that much anymore anyway. Prior to that the number of people claiming that amount was in the low hundreds anyway.
People didn't really answer your point before not because they were defending huge benefit claimants but because they felt it was an utterly irrelevant side issue. As do I.
Logged
Doobs
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16579
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #190 on:
September 26, 2014, 12:29:38 AM »
Quote from: arbboy on September 26, 2014, 12:20:43 AM
Quote from: redsimon on September 26, 2014, 12:19:44 AM
Quote from: arbboy on September 25, 2014, 11:55:49 PM
Quote from: vegaslover on September 25, 2014, 11:45:42 PM
Obv nothing to do with income tax, but poker players stil paying for local services via their council tax payments
only income tax matters on this thread! Other taxes don't count. It's a lefties thread. If you earn £60k a year on benefits though u get this paid for you (thanks to Blair and Brown's kindness for 13 years towards those who love the play the system for the max - you might even get to live in Mayfair or Westminster on the state as well even though no one in the real world can afford such luxuries) for free via other tax payers (professional gamblers do pay council tax alongside every other tax apart from income tax) and don't have to pay income tax on your income (benefits) before you pay it out of your net income.
isn't the benefit cap 25k per year? Where do you get 60k from?
It has been £25k since 2010. Before that anything goes. Hence why the country is skint! This is a grossed up figure as well just for clarity of what people would have to earn in a real job to 'take home' the benefits they do to pay for the services/rent they do. Even at a cap of £25k a year the real cap is in excess of £35k in real gross wages earned in order for them to receive £25k net.
The country is skint because of the lack of a benefit cap prior to 2010? Have you any idea how much that cost at all, or what proportion of state spending that was? Rhetorical question obviously.
Logged
Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
arbboy
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13285
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #191 on:
September 26, 2014, 12:33:42 AM »
Quote from: Doobs on September 26, 2014, 12:29:38 AM
Quote from: arbboy on September 26, 2014, 12:20:43 AM
Quote from: redsimon on September 26, 2014, 12:19:44 AM
Quote from: arbboy on September 25, 2014, 11:55:49 PM
Quote from: vegaslover on September 25, 2014, 11:45:42 PM
Obv nothing to do with income tax, but poker players stil paying for local services via their council tax payments
only income tax matters on this thread! Other taxes don't count. It's a lefties thread. If you earn £60k a year on benefits though u get this paid for you (thanks to Blair and Brown's kindness for 13 years towards those who love the play the system for the max - you might even get to live in Mayfair or Westminster on the state as well even though no one in the real world can afford such luxuries) for free via other tax payers (professional gamblers do pay council tax alongside every other tax apart from income tax) and don't have to pay income tax on your income (benefits) before you pay it out of your net income.
isn't the benefit cap 25k per year? Where do you get 60k from?
It has been £25k since 2010. Before that anything goes. Hence why the country is skint! This is a grossed up figure as well just for clarity of what people would have to earn in a real job to 'take home' the benefits they do to pay for the services/rent they do. Even at a cap of £25k a year the real cap is in excess of £35k in real gross wages earned in order for them to receive £25k net.
The country is skint because of the lack of a benefit cap prior to 2010? Have you any idea how much that cost at all, or what proportion of state spending that was? Rhetorical question obviously.
It's not so much how much it costs, more the message it sends to people who don't want to live that life because it's wrong and how demotivated they become because of it.
Logged
redarmi
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5232
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #192 on:
September 26, 2014, 12:43:22 AM »
Quote from: redsimon on September 26, 2014, 12:19:44 AM
Quote from: arbboy on September 25, 2014, 11:55:49 PM
Quote from: vegaslover on September 25, 2014, 11:45:42 PM
Obv nothing to do with income tax, but poker players stil paying for local services via their council tax payments
only income tax matters on this thread! Other taxes don't count. It's a lefties thread. If you earn £60k a year on benefits though u get this paid for you (thanks to Blair and Brown's kindness for 13 years towards those who love the play the system for the max - you might even get to live in Mayfair or Westminster on the state as well even though no one in the real world can afford such luxuries) for free via other tax payers (professional gamblers do pay council tax alongside every other tax apart from income tax) and don't have to pay income tax on your income (benefits) before you pay it out of your net income.
isn't the benefit cap 25k per year? Where do you get 60k from?
The Daily Mail ldo
Logged
http://twitter.com/redarmi123
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17523
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #193 on:
September 26, 2014, 01:26:27 AM »
Need the words "Political correctness gone mad" to complete the full house.
Where's Woodsey when you need him?
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
Woodsey
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 15846
Re: A Taxing debate
«
Reply #194 on:
September 26, 2014, 01:38:10 AM »
Quote from: The Camel on September 26, 2014, 01:26:27 AM
Need the words "Political correctness gone mad" to complete the full house.
Where's Woodsey when you need him?
Nah, PC tossers is better lol
Logged
Pages:
1
...
9
10
11
12
[
13
]
14
15
16
17
...
22
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...