blonde poker forum

Whats everyones opinions on the dress code for the ept event

No trainers or collarless shirts what do people think about this its a poker tournament not a round of golf.

Also what will happen when players turn up who havent heard the rules will they be prevented from playing. A silly rule in this day and age.

am I the only one thinking this would be about snoops trainers?

Rules are rules.

It is like saying that it is silly at Wimbledon that all Tennis Players have to wear all white

I know a guy who is going to hang around with some reasonably priced shoes and shirts.

Just look for the guy standing next to a red van and tip him the nod.

Lasy year Jen had to BUY some new shoes so that she could get in to do the updates.

I do think a reasonable dress code is a good thing though.

 ;iagree;

I think the enforced dress code is a good thing, I think that the casinos should go back to an enforced dress code, and prevent the bums from sleeping on the couches.

 ;iagree; too.

Explain this then!!!    :dontask:

We all have weak moments

They've got it spot on IMHO.

No trainers or collarless shirts is hardly a strict dresscode anyway.

If you turn up anywhere to play, you're a guest in that establishment, and need to respect their rules. I really don't see the problem.

If you turn up at The Vic "improperly dressed" by their rules you will not be allowed in, as simple as that. Many can testify to that.

It's their train set, & they can do as they wish. Punters have the same choice & rights, they can accept it, or they can go elsewhere.

What is acceptable "dress"?. It's a balance thing, a common sense thing. Suit & tie? Singlet? ( I've seen both in some places) it's just common sense, & I do think a line has to be drawn somewhere. Personally, I find it offensive to sit next to someone wearing a vest or singlet at a Poker Table, but I'm old, see?

Whatever, I hope you enjoy your time at The Vic.

A couple of years ago you wasnt even allowed in The Vic wearing Jeans :o

you wouldnt want to see me in a vest then you would be incredibly offended :D

Vests i agree with but whats wrong with a plain v neck tshirt its comfy and hardly offensive.

Well we are having a good debate what do people also think about being in your seat dead on time or you are disqualified.

A good rule.

It is their interpretation - shared by many - of the Gaming Commission Guidelines. The Vic don't make the Rules. I'm not defending them, but them's the facts.

Plain V Neck? I agree - but nobody could ever define what is "smart casual", so it's objective. To be honest, I find it hard to get worked up about such trivialties, but we are all different, & I understand why it upsets some folks.

it doesnt upset me really as i wont or cant afford more like to play the event but just thought it was worth some discussion.

Look forward to the first class updates whether they are shoed and collared up or not  :D :D :D

Disqualified for not being seated in time is a great rule IMO no matter the level. 

Everyone knows what time the tourney is supposed to start and I blame this as one of the reasons for just about every single poker tournament being late in starting!!  There really is no excuse for not being at the venue and in your seat in time.

I don't really see the point of disqualification. Sometimes things happen that make you late, no-one can predict a motorway accident!

Just please no alternates!

Well, I think if you are not there on time, you are entitled to be removed from the Comp, & refunded your Buy-In & Reg Fee.

Many Casinos hold up the start of play because one player has not taken their seat, we hear announcement after announcement, "Mr Smith, Mr Smith, we are waiting to start, please take your seat".

Meanwhile, the other 149 of us, all of whom took the time & trouble to arrive in time, sit & wait patiently for Mr Selfish-Daft-Bugger. Can't be doing with THAT.

is it a gaming law that you have to be in your seat when the tourney starts? I can't see what the big deal is, if you paid £3.5k and got stuck on the tube it seems silly to get bounced from the comp for being 3 hands late... why dont they just start them off on time and blind the people off? my view is that its their entry, their chips, they should be able to do as they wish. Just my own personal opinion.

Tough to disagree, but it's a Gaming Commision thing. I think they actually say "must be on the premises" but that's hard to enforce, (or easy to get round...) so the Casinos take it a step further to be safe. Regulated, Licensed Casinos have to kow-tow to "Compliance", & with good reason.

It is in the gaming board guidlines, which is as good as law, that 'All players must be on the premises at the start of the competition'. Many casinos require players are seated for the first hand to ensure that they are complying with this regulation.

thanks a lot... if thats the case then I agree it makes perfect sense to have them in their seats, imagine the problems with people using the old "I was in the stairwell for 20 minutes" trick!

I agree, lets keep poker in the dark ages.
What harm does it do whether he/she is present or not?
If they have paid their entry fee simply blind them off when its their time to post.

As for not allowing alternates,  Then we will never enjoy the big prize pools the Americans are used to with small buy in fees.
The casinos at the moment are simply not big enough to cope with the growth of poker , so alternates are the best possible solution instead of 3 or 4 day 1 starts.

if a person isnt on the premises at the start under the GC rules they are entiltied to a full refund so this rule would have to change if we are to start blinding them off

but with so many events selling out people traveling a long way have to pay in advance now imagine the trouble when joe bloggs arrives at the casino 5 hours late after his flight was canceled to be told sorry mate your £5k has been blinded away the legal ramifactions would be a nightmare the airline quoting there T&C and the casino quoting there

i dont see a problem with everyone being in there seat for the start if a player then wants to take a break for an hour or 2 they can go do what ever they want

That is what I m trying to say, the rules DO need changing.
If someone has a five hour plane delay, then all they need to do is phone the casino and asked to be withdrawn before the tourny begins . Then if we allowed alternates, they could go on alternate list and play if they made the cutoff time

I like to know what i am sitting down to in a comp.

I don't like not knowing how big the field will be before i start playing.

I hate alternates.

I cannot believe for 1 minute you would be put off by the size of the field James. Dont suppose we will ever see you playing the WSOP main event then

You don't read the board much anymore then :D

I don't attempt to qualify for exactly that reason.


The size of the field is hugely important for bankroll considerations.

I was going to offer to sponsor you, Oh well never mind :)

My exact words were "i wouldnt play it unless someone paid me in" :D

..and the one I liked.

"I'd rather buy 10,000 lottery tickets"  :D