blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => The Rail => Topic started by: stato_1 on November 23, 2011, 10:09:42 PM



Title: Dilemma
Post by: stato_1 on November 23, 2011, 10:09:42 PM
Grinding online with a mate, he asks me to look after his tables while he nips to bathroom. Just so happens we're on the same table on one of tourneys, and as I carry my laptop over to his desktop I see that he has been dealt AKs utg with 25 bigs in that one, and before I act for him, I notice that I have KK and cover. Suggested line pls?


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2011, 10:10:40 PM
LOL stack him, that will teach him.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: titaniumbean on November 23, 2011, 10:19:09 PM
Grinding online with a mate, he asks me to look after his tables while he nips to bathroom. Just so happens we're on the same table on one of tourneys, and as I carry my laptop over to his desktop I see that he has been dealt AKs utg with 25 bigs in that one, and before I act for him, I notice that I have KK and cover. Suggested line pls?


minraise open utg. you min3bet, he min 4bets you min 5bet he min 6bets until the min24th bet puts ya'll ai.


see if you hold rotflmfao


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: leethefish on November 23, 2011, 10:22:23 PM
Lol stack him


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: edgascoigne on November 23, 2011, 10:25:57 PM
Perfect opportunity to take the piss whilst he takes a piss imo.

You: (shouting) "You've got AKs, what would you like me to do?"
Flatmate: "Make it 2.1x"
You: "You've been 3bet mate"
Flatmate: "Who by?"
You: "Me. I'd hurry if I were you, clock's ticking".

If he fails to make it back in time, you win and dont feel bad.

If he makes it back he will be so angry he will tilt shove (not that they wouldn't go in anyway) and you can call and the action was all his.

Easy game.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: Rupert on November 23, 2011, 10:33:07 PM
let him timeout


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: celtic on November 23, 2011, 10:34:11 PM
Make him bet 24.9 bigs, you jam, then snap fold him;)


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: Boba Fett on November 23, 2011, 10:52:14 PM
let him timeout
This, although ur doing him a favour its not cool to stack him.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: mulhuzz on November 23, 2011, 11:34:36 PM
let him timeout

or just open fold it. although that looks bad to collusion detection software.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: stato_1 on November 23, 2011, 11:58:26 PM
yeah i just folded his hand... purely for your entertainment, i got it in vs 22 and the guy flopped a set, wouldve held vs AK!


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: mulhuzz on November 24, 2011, 01:06:12 AM
yeah i just folded his hand... purely for your entertainment, i got it in vs 22 and the guy flopped a set, wouldve held vs AK!

yh, but if you'd got it in vs ak there'd have been an ace of justice!

more interesting question: he has AA and you have KK?

i think i 2.1x him and time my own hand out....


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: boldie on November 24, 2011, 10:05:15 AM
Perfect opportunity to take the piss whilst he takes a piss imo.

You: (shouting) "You've got AKs, what would you like me to do?"
Flatmate: "Make it 2.1x"
You: "You've been 3bet mate"
Flatmate: "Who by?"
You: "Me. I'd hurry if I were you, clock's ticking".

If he fails to make it back in time, you win and dont feel bad.



Love this,.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: Rupert on November 24, 2011, 10:10:49 AM
just timeout all of his hands when there is a conflict of interest (so fold AA when you have KK)


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: kinboshi on November 24, 2011, 10:12:36 AM
Perfect opportunity to take the piss whilst he takes a piss imo.

You: (shouting) "You've got AKs, what would you like me to do?"
Flatmate: "Make it 2.1x"
You: "You've been 3bet mate"
Flatmate: "Who by?"
You: "Me. I'd hurry if I were you, clock's ticking".

If he fails to make it back in time, you win and dont feel bad.



Love this,.

Brilliant!


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: Simon Galloway on November 24, 2011, 10:14:03 AM
yeah i just folded his hand... purely for your entertainment, i got it in vs 22 and the guy flopped a set, wouldve held vs AK!
Interesting that if AK had opened, 22 might not have been in the hand.  Good for your mate, not so good for you.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: JK on November 24, 2011, 10:31:23 AM
Depends who it is. Thigh I fold. Alex, shove AINEC.

Your welcome


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: Rupert on November 24, 2011, 11:26:25 AM
yeah i just folded his hand... purely for your entertainment, i got it in vs 22 and the guy flopped a set, wouldve held vs AK!
Interesting that if AK had opened, 22 might not have been in the hand.  Good for your mate, not so good for you.

i don't know, still pretty good for you...


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: snoopy1239 on November 24, 2011, 11:35:18 AM
I think that once you realise you're on the same table, you should stop looking at his laptop and just play your own so his hands (inc. the A-K) just time out.

In general, I'm pretty sure that even playing one hand that isn't yours whilst your mate is in the loo is against the rules, so I might just let him time out whether we're at the same table or not.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: MTT DESTROYER on November 24, 2011, 12:22:15 PM
I think that once you realise you're on the same table, you should stop looking at his laptop and just play your own so his hands (inc. the A-K) just time out.

In general, I'm pretty sure that even playing one hand that isn't yours whilst your mate is in the loo is against the rules, so I might just let him time out whether we're at the same table or not.

Jesus would't even do that


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: gatso on November 24, 2011, 12:42:38 PM
I think that once you realise you're on the same table, you should stop looking at his laptop and just play your own so his hands (inc. the A-K) just time out.

this really

a weird situation that you wouldn't have thought about beforehand but tbh in future he should sit out at any table that you're both on before leaving

as it is what's happened is collusion even though neither of you intended it to be. it's no different from you shouting across the room to him that you've got KK and him folding AK because of that


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: titaniumbean on November 24, 2011, 03:27:32 PM
I think that once you realise you're on the same table, you should stop looking at his laptop and just play your own so his hands (inc. the A-K) just time out.

this really

a weird situation that you wouldn't have thought about beforehand but tbh in future he should sit out at any table that you're both on before leaving

as it is what's happened is collusion even though neither of you intended it to be. it's no different from you shouting across the room to him that you've got KK and him folding AK because of that


ya that's why I stack off as you both would if playing. sitting out/timing out/ raise folding is all just clearly collusion.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: Girgy85 on November 24, 2011, 05:04:38 PM
Perfect opportunity to take the piss whilst he takes a piss imo.

You: (shouting) "You've got AKs, what would you like me to do?"
Flatmate: "Make it 2.1x"
You: "You've been 3bet mate"
Flatmate: "Who by?"
You: "Me. I'd hurry if I were you, clock's ticking".

If he fails to make it back in time, you win and dont feel bad.



Love this,.

Brilliant!

Quality.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: GreekStein on November 24, 2011, 05:09:49 PM
Don't blame you Andy. In quick time in a situation that's not happened before I probably woulda done the same thing.

Least we know next time.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: titaniumbean on November 24, 2011, 05:47:37 PM
So is this situation another one of those were we all know it's cheating/collusion or w/e and yet because it's online and people can't see us lets just pretend there are no rules?

If we're going to cheat why not raise 99 % of utg's stack and have him fold to our jam so we cant be sucked out on?


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: GreekStein on November 24, 2011, 05:56:28 PM
So is this situation another one of those were we all know it's cheating/collusion or w/e and yet because it's online and people can't see us lets just pretend there are no rules?

If we're going to cheat why not raise 99 % of utg's stack and have him fold to our jam so we cant be sucked out on?

Bit different mate.

You can't take over for a mate live if he pops to the loo. Andy was just doin a quick favour and whilst it isn't allowed, I don't know many people who would think that's the slightest bit wrong tbh.

Andy shoulda realised there was a potentially awkward situation if they were on the same table but I personally woulda been thinking, 'I might look a real dick if I stack my mate here' and prob done the same.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: titaniumbean on November 24, 2011, 06:25:52 PM
So is this situation another one of those were we all know it's cheating/collusion or w/e and yet because it's online and people can't see us lets just pretend there are no rules?

If we're going to cheat why not raise 99 % of utg's stack and have him fold to our jam so we cant be sucked out on?

Bit different mate.

You can't take over for a mate live if he pops to the loo. Andy was just doin a quick favour and whilst it isn't allowed, I don't know many people who would think that's the slightest bit wrong tbh.

Andy shoulda realised there was a potentially awkward situation if they were on the same table but I personally woulda been thinking, 'I might look a real dick if I stack my mate here' and prob done the same.


WHAT? bit different to what? the rules and regulations are clear just because it's harder to enforce doesn't mean you're meant to break them?!

So you think that although it's against the rules its fine to do because ....?
because you're a cheater? because you don't care? because you're ignorant?

If we're happy to cheat the field why should we then make the best decision for our friend? we're costing ourself by him not getting it in when he would never normally fold.


At what point do we not fold his hand utg?
How much do we change stuff if we back him?

And what level of cheating do people actually condone ?


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: GreekStein on November 24, 2011, 06:28:21 PM
So is this situation another one of those were we all know it's cheating/collusion or w/e and yet because it's online and people can't see us lets just pretend there are no rules?

If we're going to cheat why not raise 99 % of utg's stack and have him fold to our jam so we cant be sucked out on?

Bit different mate.

You can't take over for a mate live if he pops to the loo. Andy was just doin a quick favour and whilst it isn't allowed, I don't know many people who would think that's the slightest bit wrong tbh.

Andy shoulda realised there was a potentially awkward situation if they were on the same table but I personally woulda been thinking, 'I might look a real dick if I stack my mate here' and prob done the same.


WHAT? bit different to what? the rules and regulations are clear just because it's harder to enforce doesn't mean you're meant to break them?!

So you think that although it's against the rules its fine to do because ....?
because you're a cheater? because you don't care? because you're ignorant?

If we're happy to cheat the field why should we then make the best decision for our friend? we're costing ourself by him not getting it in when he would never normally fold.


At what point do we not fold his hand utg?
How much do we change stuff if we back him?

And what level of cheating do people actually condone ?

I just think that the first time this happens its an honest mistake.

If it happened again after this it would be out of line.

Calm down dear.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: titaniumbean on November 24, 2011, 06:32:18 PM
They are fair questions, everyone in this thread seems to just be advocating collusion whilst clearly knowing it's collusion. Is anyone not scummy?


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: GreekStein on November 24, 2011, 06:34:53 PM
They are fair questions, everyone in this thread seems to just be advocating collusion whilst clearly knowing it's collusion. Is anyone not scummy?

not as scummy as selling to your dad at a markup ;)


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: stato_1 on November 24, 2011, 06:35:42 PM
I think that once you realise you're on the same table, you should stop looking at his laptop and just play your own so his hands (inc. the A-K) just time out.

this really

a weird situation that you wouldn't have thought about beforehand but tbh in future he should sit out at any table that you're both on before leaving

as it is what's happened is collusion even though neither of you intended it to be. it's no different from you shouting across the room to him that you've got KK and him folding AK because of that


ya that's why I stack off as you both would if playing. sitting out/timing out/ raise folding is all just clearly collusion.

But surely timing out is the only thing thats not collusion, cos that is what would happen if i didn't play his tables


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: George2Loose on November 24, 2011, 06:38:37 PM
What would you have done if you had both had AK? Or if he had Aces?


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: action man on November 24, 2011, 06:41:16 PM
the answer is, that you play it the same way he would have done, ie get it in, this is correct answer btw


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: titaniumbean on November 24, 2011, 06:43:15 PM
I think that once you realise you're on the same table, you should stop looking at his laptop and just play your own so his hands (inc. the A-K) just time out.

this really

a weird situation that you wouldn't have thought about beforehand but tbh in future he should sit out at any table that you're both on before leaving

as it is what's happened is collusion even though neither of you intended it to be. it's no different from you shouting across the room to him that you've got KK and him folding AK because of that


ya that's why I stack off as you both would if playing. sitting out/timing out/ raise folding is all just clearly collusion.

But surely timing out is the only thing thats not collusion, cos that is what would happen if i didn't play his tables


ya to clarify I think you should only fold pre, IF You are to play his hand then I don't see how you can do anything other than stack off as some were suggesting R/F etc.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: smashedagain on November 24, 2011, 06:52:43 PM
Playing from the same ip address and this comes up sounds alarm bells and could lead to a bit of bother.
Personally I snap transfer his roll to one of my mums accounts :)


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: Girgy85 on November 24, 2011, 06:54:43 PM
Playing from the same ip address and this comes up sounds alarm bells and could lead to a bit of bother.
Personally I snap transfer his roll to one of my mums accounts :)

Your mum has multiple accounts? tut tut


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: gatso on November 24, 2011, 06:58:47 PM
But surely timing out is the only thing thats not collusion, cos that is what would happen if i didn't play his tables

but you're not timing out because that's what would've happened if you didn't play, if you were going to do that you wouldn't get up and move across the room. you're timing him out because you have a better hand than him which is clearly collusion


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: kinboshi on November 24, 2011, 07:01:00 PM
He could time out if he'd gone to the loo.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: smashedagain on November 24, 2011, 07:03:02 PM
Playing from the same ip address and this comes up sounds alarm bells and could lead to a bit of bother.
Personally I snap transfer his roll to one of my mums accounts :)

Your mum has multiple accounts? tut tut
She does not know this ;)


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: Boba Fett on November 24, 2011, 07:06:29 PM
I guess the most ethical thing to do would be to time out his hand no matter what hand he has on that table and leave him timed out on it until he comes back.
 


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: cambridgealex on November 24, 2011, 07:14:44 PM
I guess the most ethical thing to do would be to time out his hand no matter what hand he has on that table and leave him timed out on it until he comes back.
 

Yeh agreed, play his other tables but sit out on the one youre on.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: titaniumbean on November 24, 2011, 07:16:15 PM
I guess the most ethical thing to do would be to time out his hand no matter what hand he has on that table and leave him timed out on it until he comes back.
 

Yeh agreed, play his other tables but sit out on the one youre on.


ethical in what sense?


between you and him yes, ethical in terms of what the word means? obv not it's still cheating vs the rest of the field.


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: PizzicatoXev on November 24, 2011, 11:25:04 PM
the answer is, that you play it the same way he would have done, ie get it in, this is correct answer btw

This


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: MTT DESTROYER on November 25, 2011, 12:03:54 AM
They are fair questions, everyone in this thread seems to just be advocating collusion whilst clearly knowing it's collusion. Is anyone not scummy?

Give me the collusion/scummy speech but honestly, would you really screw a mate over here?  Really?

IMO doing so is actually worse than breaking the rules!


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: titaniumbean on November 25, 2011, 12:11:09 AM
They are fair questions, everyone in this thread seems to just be advocating collusion whilst clearly knowing it's collusion. Is anyone not scummy?

Give me the collusion/scummy speech but honestly, would you really screw a mate over here?  Really?

IMO doing so is actually worse than breaking the rules!



I was making a point. You're choosing to 'screw' someone by knowingly going against the rules, if everyone is such a dousche as to assume that standard why not screw your own mate?


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: MTT DESTROYER on November 25, 2011, 12:13:26 AM
The person you're screwing is yourself, i'd happily let it go ;)

This is purely from a recreational/5 tourny a night point of view.......


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: George2Loose on November 25, 2011, 12:50:15 AM
take lappie in for the poo imo


Title: Re: Dilemma
Post by: Girgy85 on November 25, 2011, 01:47:16 AM
take lappie in for the poo imo

this