blonde poker forum

Community Forums => Betting Tips and Sport Discussion => Topic started by: George2Loose on December 08, 2012, 06:16:32 PM



Title: Martin O Neil
Post by: George2Loose on December 08, 2012, 06:16:32 PM
I know there's been debate about this before.

Is Martin O Neill destined for mediocrity? He has been touted as one of the best footie managers in the past.

He did perform miracles at clubs like Leicester and made Villa competitive too but it all seems to be short lived.

Villa fell from grace quite dramatically. He comes in at Sunderland- again they go on an amazing run.

Now look at them- is the MON effect short lived? Will ever get a "big" job?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 08, 2012, 06:23:37 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TL900 on December 08, 2012, 06:24:57 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Will ever get a "big" job?

statement still stands


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TightEnd on December 08, 2012, 06:31:08 PM
Villa, he made them competitve as it coincided with Lerner taking over from Ellis and investing money

When O'Neill left when Lerner pulled the funding required to compete for top six, they fell from grace



I am biased, will always be a great in my eyes. What he did at Leicester was incredible

However if he fails at Sunderland which looks likely I do think a top six club type job won't be his going forward

He will always get jobs at mid ranking clubs though


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: George2Loose on December 08, 2012, 06:57:44 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Yeh was Langley said. Think I could manage Rangers or Celtic 5-10 years ago and win the league


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Camel on December 08, 2012, 07:11:28 PM
Villa, he made them competitve as it coincided with Lerner taking over from Ellis and investing money

When O'Neill left when Lerner pulled the funding required to compete for top six, they fell from grace



I am biased, will always be a great in my eyes. What he did at Leicester was incredible

However if he fails at Sunderland which looks likely I do think a top six club type job won't be his going forward

He will always get jobs at mid ranking clubs though

If Fergie had retired when he first said he was going to, MON would have been odds on to get the job.

A million to one now


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Camel on December 08, 2012, 07:12:19 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Yeh was Langley said. Think I could manage Rangers or Celtic 5-10 years ago and win the league

If you were Rangers manager 5 years ago, I'd have my maximum on Celtic to win the league.

And vice versa :)


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Longy on December 08, 2012, 07:19:59 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Yeh was Langley said. Think I could manage Rangers or Celtic 5-10 years ago and win the league

They very nearly won the UEFA cup under him and had a couple of decent other runs in Europe.

His reputation is on the wane but that just shows how fickle football is. He has yet to fail at any club he has been at and certainly at Leicester performed minor miracles.



Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: George2Loose on December 08, 2012, 07:32:33 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Yeh was Langley said. Think I could manage Rangers or Celtic 5-10 years ago and win the league

If you were Rangers manager 5 years ago, I'd have my maximum on Celtic to win the league.

And vice versa :)

I'm insulted!


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on December 08, 2012, 07:55:19 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Will ever get a "big" job?

statement still stands

It's generally a bad idea to troll about Celtic and The Rangers on this board, things escalate very quickly. You're fairly new on here and probably don't know any better but the last thing most on here want to read is yet another argument oN the size, merits etc. of Celtic compared to medium sized Engliish clubs like Spurs, Newcastle and the like its been done to death on numerous occasions and no one ever changes their view.

MON struggled initially with Villa and then finished in the top 6 every season (I think). Given time Sunderland will be fine but I can't see him getting a big job if we are talking Man Utd, Man City, Chelsea or Arsenal. I thought he would have been a good fit for Liverpool.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: horseplayer on December 08, 2012, 07:57:37 PM
what a lot of people fail to remember or dont mention about his "good job" at villa is that he had by the time he left and for the majority of his time there the 3rd to 6th biggest wage bill in the league. He signed various players he never really used who were on massive money and which partly has led to lerner cutting down the costs now as it was so unsustainable.

he did a decent job at villa some good jobs before that and is so far doing pretty badly at sunderland



Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: George2Loose on December 08, 2012, 08:05:05 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Will ever get a "big" job?

statement still stands

It's generally a bad idea to troll about Celtic and The Rangers on this board, things escalate very quickly. You're fairly new on here and probably don't know any better but the last thing most on here want to read is yet another argument oN the size, merits etc. of Celtic compared to medium sized Engliish clubs like Spurs, Newcastle and the like its been done to death on numerous occasions and no one ever changes their view.

MON struggled initially with Villa and then finished in the top 6 every season (I think). Given time Sunderland will be fine but I can't see him getting a big job if we are talking Man Utd, Man City, Chelsea or Arsenal. I thought he would have been a good fit for Liverpool.

I personally don't see this as trolling? As with most subjects everyone has their own opinion. I wouldn't say Celtic or Rangers are a big club personally but that doesn't mean I'm trolling/right


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Camel on December 08, 2012, 08:09:13 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Yeh was Langley said. Think I could manage Rangers or Celtic 5-10 years ago and win the league

If you were Rangers manager 5 years ago, I'd have my maximum on Celtic to win the league.

And vice versa :)

I'm insulted!

The post match interviews would have been fun though.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on December 08, 2012, 08:15:08 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Will ever get a "big" job?

statement still stands

It's generally a bad idea to troll about Celtic and The Rangers on this board, things escalate very quickly. You're fairly new on here and probably don't know any better but the last thing most on here want to read is yet another argument oN the size, merits etc. of Celtic compared to medium sized Engliish clubs like Spurs, Newcastle and the like its been done to death on numerous occasions and no one ever changes their view.

MON struggled initially with Villa and then finished in the top 6 every season (I think). Given time Sunderland will be fine but I can't see him getting a big job if we are talking Man Utd, Man City, Chelsea or Arsenal. I thought he would have been a good fit for Liverpool.

I personally don't see this as trolling? As with most subjects everyone has their own opinion. I wouldn't say Celtic or Rangers are a big club personally but that doesn't mean I'm trolling/right

I quoted TL900s post.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 08, 2012, 08:18:04 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Will ever get a "big" job?

statement still stands

It's generally a bad idea to troll about Celtic and The Rangers on this board, things escalate very quickly. You're fairly new on here and probably don't know any better but the last thing most on here want to read is yet another argument oN the size, merits etc. of Celtic compared to medium sized Engliish clubs like Spurs, Newcastle and the like its been done to death on numerous occasions and no one ever changes their view.

MON struggled initially with Villa and then finished in the top 6 every season (I think). Given time Sunderland will be fine but I can't see him getting a big job if we are talking Man Utd, Man City, Chelsea or Arsenal. I thought he would have been a good fit for Liverpool.

I personally don't see this as trolling? As with most subjects everyone has their own opinion. I wouldn't say Celtic or Rangers are a big club personally but that doesn't mean I'm trolling/right
What's your idea of a "Big" Club?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TL900 on December 08, 2012, 08:21:03 PM
I wasn't trolling at all lol.

People really need to chill out


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: George2Loose on December 08, 2012, 08:21:12 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Will ever get a "big" job?

statement still stands

It's generally a bad idea to troll about Celtic and The Rangers on this board, things escalate very quickly. You're fairly new on here and probably don't know any better but the last thing most on here want to read is yet another argument oN the size, merits etc. of Celtic compared to medium sized Engliish clubs like Spurs, Newcastle and the like its been done to death on numerous occasions and no one ever changes their view.

MON struggled initially with Villa and then finished in the top 6 every season (I think). Given time Sunderland will be fine but I can't see him getting a big job if we are talking Man Utd, Man City, Chelsea or Arsenal. I thought he would have been a good fit for Liverpool.

I personally don't see this as trolling? As with most subjects everyone has their own opinion. I wouldn't say Celtic or Rangers are a big club personally but that doesn't mean I'm trolling/right

I quoted TL900s post.


Yup and I quoted yours


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: George2Loose on December 08, 2012, 08:22:33 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Yeh was Langley said. Think I could manage Rangers or Celtic 5-10 years ago and win the league

If you were Rangers manager 5 years ago, I'd have my maximum on Celtic to win the league.

And vice versa :)

I'm insulted!

The post match interviews would have been fun though.

Probs get boring

When we win- mad giggles

When we lose- moaning about how bad I run.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TL900 on December 08, 2012, 08:27:31 PM
and no I don't see celtic or rangers as 'big' clubs. That is my opinion of which I am entitled


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on December 08, 2012, 08:28:32 PM
You do know he was Celtic Manager?

Will ever get a "big" job?

statement still stands

It's generally a bad idea to troll about Celtic and The Rangers on this board, things escalate very quickly. You're fairly new on here and probably don't know any better but the last thing most on here want to read is yet another argument oN the size, merits etc. of Celtic compared to medium sized Engliish clubs like Spurs, Newcastle and the like its been done to death on numerous occasions and no one ever changes their view.

MON struggled initially with Villa and then finished in the top 6 every season (I think). Given time Sunderland will be fine but I can't see him getting a big job if we are talking Man Utd, Man City, Chelsea or Arsenal. I thought he would have been a good fit for Liverpool.

I personally don't see this as trolling? As with most subjects everyone has their own opinion. I wouldn't say Celtic or Rangers are a big club personally but that doesn't mean I'm trolling/right

I quoted TL900s post.


Yup and I quoted yours

Sorry  I thought you thought that I thought you were trolling ;)


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on December 08, 2012, 08:30:20 PM
and no I don't see celtic or rangers as 'big' clubs. That is my opinion of which I am entitled

You're half right  :)

No one said you weren't allowed an opinion.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: seven2unsuited on December 08, 2012, 09:33:10 PM
and no I don't see celtic or rangers as 'big' clubs. That is my opinion of which I am entitled

Not many big clubs in Britain then....


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TL900 on December 08, 2012, 09:34:47 PM
and no I don't see celtic or rangers as 'big' clubs. That is my opinion of which I am entitled

Not many big clubs in Britain then....

correct


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: dino1980 on December 09, 2012, 01:28:59 AM
Pretty certain O'Neil has never been sacked but has always resigned/been poached (don't know this for sure but housemate said he read it). Personally think he's overrated and can see him walking away from Sunderland pretty soon if their current form continues and pressure increases.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 07:33:09 AM
Celtic and rangers are only big clubs in Scotland.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: celtic on December 09, 2012, 07:36:01 AM
Celtic and rangers are only big clubs in Scotland.

quoted so you don't get to delete it when you sober up.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: rfgqqabc on December 09, 2012, 08:16:29 AM
Celtic and rangers are only big clubs in Scotland.

quoted so you don't get to delete it when you sober up.

ITS ALL RELATIVE AND A MATTER OF OPINION. THE SIZE OF FISH IS RELATIVE ONLY TO THE POND.

/Thread


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: celtic on December 09, 2012, 08:29:13 AM
Celtic and rangers are only big clubs in Scotland.

quoted so you don't get to delete it when you sober up.

ITS ALL RELATIVE AND A MATTER OF OPINION. THE SIZE OF FISH IS RELATIVE ONLY TO THE POND.

/Thread



relative to what?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: rfgqqabc on December 09, 2012, 08:44:33 AM
Well virtually every club could be classified as big or small depending on context and this argument about club size/penis size/whose the bigger fan is one of those inevitable internet debates that pops up over and over and never ever becomes interesting.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: MANTIS01 on December 09, 2012, 10:11:55 AM
Personally think MON is a boss manager. Learnt from the best in Brian Clough and is a beacon of loyalty and integrity in a modern game where those values are thin on the ground. Sunderland need a 20 goal striker desperately but Darren Bent fecked off for money and Asamoah Gyan fecked off for money hence they are devoid of goals. At Villa they were all set to challenge for CL places before Lerner pulled the plug. I agree some of the wages were ridic and unsustainable but I can't imagine managers negotiate commercial packages for players in modern prem football clubs. I would run through walls for MON and I'm sure his players feel the same.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: celtic on December 09, 2012, 10:49:07 AM
Well virtually every club could be classified as big or small depending on context and this argument about club size/penis size/whose the bigger fan is one of those inevitable internet debates that pops up over and over and never ever becomes interesting.

There are big clubs and there are small clubs. That is a fact. It's quite obvious which is which. And when someone states a club isn't big, when it clearly is, is just daft.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: rfgqqabc on December 09, 2012, 10:57:41 AM
Well virtually every club could be classified as big or small depending on context and this argument about club size/penis size/whose the bigger fan is one of those inevitable internet debates that pops up over and over and never ever becomes interesting.

There are big clubs and there are small clubs. That is a fact. It's quite obvious which is which. And when someone states a club isn't big, when it clearly is, is just daft.

Ok, Sheffield united a big club? Leeds? Sheffield Wednesday? Stoke? Bayern? Ajax? Celtic are pretty irrelevant on the European level and the league is a joke. Would you say Newcastle are a big club? Liverpool? Fan base isn't a good measure imo

Tl will never agree with you and vice versa.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: celtic on December 09, 2012, 11:04:14 AM
Well virtually every club could be classified as big or small depending on context and this argument about club size/penis size/whose the bigger fan is one of those inevitable internet debates that pops up over and over and never ever becomes interesting.

There are big clubs and there are small clubs. That is a fact. It's quite obvious which is which. And when someone states a club isn't big, when it clearly is, is just daft.

Ok, Sheffield united a big club? Leeds? Sheffield Wednesday? Stoke? Bayern? Ajax? Celtic are pretty irrelevant on the European level and the league is a joke. Would you say Newcastle are a big club? Liverpool? Fan base isn't a good measure imo

Tl will never agree with you and vice versa.

My point is, there are big clubs, and there are small clubs. Aaron's comment about Celtic & Rangers only being big in Scotland is a ridic comment to make.

Why isn't fan base a good measure? Not saying it's the best way to measure by the way.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kukushkin88 on December 09, 2012, 11:06:18 AM
Well virtually every club could be classified as big or small depending on context and this argument about club size/penis size/whose the bigger fan is one of those inevitable internet debates that pops up over and over and never ever becomes interesting.

There are big clubs and there are small clubs. That is a fact. It's quite obvious which is which. And when someone states a club isn't big, when it clearly is, is just daft.

Ok, Sheffield united a big club? Leeds? Sheffield Wednesday? Stoke? Bayern? Ajax? Celtic are pretty irrelevant on the European level and the league is a joke. Would you say Newcastle are a big club? Liverpool? Fan base isn't a good measure imo

Tl will never agree with you and vice versa.

What should the measure be?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TightEnd on December 09, 2012, 11:06:27 AM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.


In England there are plenty of big clubs outside the premiership and plenty of small ones in. In that, I would argue that fan base is much more important tnat the league you are in to argue which teams are big or not. Not that it matters!




Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: rfgqqabc on December 09, 2012, 11:08:28 AM
Well virtually every club could be classified as big or small depending on context and this argument about club size/penis size/whose the bigger fan is one of those inevitable internet debates that pops up over and over and never ever becomes interesting.

There are big clubs and there are small clubs. That is a fact. It's quite obvious which is which. And when someone states a club isn't big, when it clearly is, is just daft.

Ok, Sheffield united a big club? Leeds? Sheffield Wednesday? Stoke? Bayern? Ajax? Celtic are pretty irrelevant on the European level and the league is a joke. Would you say Newcastle are a big club? Liverpool? Fan base isn't a good measure imo

Tl will never agree with you and vice versa.

My point is, there are big clubs, and there are small clubs. Aaron's comment about Celtic & Rangers only being big in Scotland is a ridic comment to make.

Why isn't fan base a good measure? Not saying it's the best way to measure by the way.

I mean stadium attendance or something like that is ok but virtually every big club sells out once a week. Total fans is highly skewed because of the support man u and co have in Asia, south Africa, USA, China etc. I think Aarons statement is at least somewhat accurate. I'd never argue the south American clubs are small but couldn't give you much info on them

Number of British fans best benchmark?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Baron on December 09, 2012, 12:32:50 PM
what a lot of people fail to remember or dont mention about his "good job" at villa is that he had by the time he left and for the majority of his time there the 3rd to 6th biggest wage bill in the league. He signed various players he never really used who were on massive money and which partly has led to lerner cutting down the costs now as it was so unsustainable.

he did a decent job at villa some good jobs before that and is so far doing pretty badly at sunderland



This is true.

Looking at the bigger picture over his entire term his transfer dealings at Villa were very hit and miss. I think the fairest thing to say is he left a decent side but didn't leave a club in a sound position.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Baron on December 09, 2012, 12:36:07 PM
Celtic and rangers are only big clubs in Scotland.

Couldn't disagree more.

They're the weakest they've ever been, but they are huge clubs.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: celtic on December 09, 2012, 12:37:20 PM
Alex Ferfuson made some real bad signings. Lots of Managers have. Doesn't make them a bad manager.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: celtic on December 09, 2012, 12:37:56 PM
Celtic and rangers are only big clubs in Scotland.

Couldn't disagree more.

They're the weakest they've ever been, but they are huge clubs.

We have been a lot weaker than we are now.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: sovietsong on December 09, 2012, 12:41:25 PM
panathinaikos > celtic

;)


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Baron on December 09, 2012, 12:44:07 PM
Alex Ferfuson made some real bad signings. Lots of Managers have. Doesn't make them a bad manager.

I agree. But leaving the club £100m in debt with a pretty average squad is a bit different from Alex Ferguson, one of the greatest managers ever to manage, signing Jumbo Jumbo.

For me MON's time at Villa doesn't cover him in glory. He did a great job at Leicester and a very good job at Celtic. They're his best bits.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: celtic on December 09, 2012, 12:46:00 PM
york city > leeds united

;)

fyp x


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Baron on December 09, 2012, 12:52:00 PM
Celtic and rangers are only big clubs in Scotland.

Couldn't disagree more.

They're the weakest they've ever been, but they are huge clubs.

We have been a lot weaker than we are now.

In the modern era?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: celtic on December 09, 2012, 12:57:25 PM
Celtic and rangers are only big clubs in Scotland.

Couldn't disagree more.

They're the weakest they've ever been, but they are huge clubs.

We have been a lot weaker than we are now.

In the modern era?

Our team now is a lot stronger than it was under Strachan, Barnes, Venglos, Mowbray, Macari, Brady.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 09, 2012, 01:32:43 PM
Celtic and rangers are only big clubs in Scotland.
That confirms it, Celtic are the biggest Club the World has ever seen.
Back to MON chat.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 09, 2012, 01:44:32 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.


In England there are plenty of big clubs outside the premiership and plenty of small ones in. In that, I would argue that fan base is much more important tnat the league you are in to argue which teams are big or not. Not that it matters!



Good post although I would add Celtic's away support which has consistently took huge Numbers all over Europe, when you consider where our Supporters core Base is in Geographical terms to mainland Europe only a Handful of Clubs can compete in that terms.
"Football without Fans is nothing"


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Alverton on December 09, 2012, 01:59:52 PM
Big/small club discussion is always fairly redundant, as its all relevant.  My football watching life has been the '93-94 onwards, so therefore I can't rate some teams history as highly as for example Tighty can. 

MON has always been slightly overrated, but is still a solid mid table manager.  Sunderland imo are only a Darren Bent and a bit more depth in defence away from being a fairly safe midtable side.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on December 09, 2012, 02:03:35 PM
Celtic and rangers are only big clubs in Scotland.

Couldn't disagree more.

They're the weakest they've ever been, but they are huge clubs.

Rangers are at the weakest they have ever been, they went into admin and ultimately liquidation and a new club was formed in the summer that now plays in the 4th tier of Scottish football.

Celtic are in the last 16 of the CL and virtually debt free, we stand to make in the region of €30m from the CLthis season. We operate on a Moneyball type model, buying low and selling high, Wanyama, Forster and Hooper were signed for a combined total of around £5m if we had to sell them we would get around £30m. We do this because of the lack of revenue generated from the SPL, the country that we play in is the only thing holding us back.

If there was a 20 team European League Celtic would absolutely be in it.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: bobby1 on December 09, 2012, 02:05:05 PM
O Neil looked shot on MOTD last night, tho the question that annoyed him was pretty crass.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on December 09, 2012, 02:06:49 PM
Big/small club discussion is always fairly redundant, as its all relevant.  My football watching life has been the '93-94 onwards, so therefore I can't rate some teams history as highly as for example Tighty can. 



That's a good point, you get the impression that some people think Sky invented football.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Alverton on December 09, 2012, 02:12:10 PM
Big/small club discussion is always fairly redundant, as its all relevant.  My football watching life has been the '93-94 onwards, so therefore I can't rate some teams history as highly as for example Tighty can. 



That's a good point, you get the impression that some people think Sky invented football.

More my age and Sky football concidentally started when I started watching.  Has Sky been bad for football overall?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: david3103 on December 09, 2012, 02:13:15 PM
given the extent of the Scots diaspora it's hardly surprising that the two biggest Scottish clubs have a lot of far flung support.

the aussie and US 'Scots' are more likely to assert their link to the auld country by supporting whichever of the Old Firm best fits their religious and or political sense of themselves.

as for MON, daresay he'll always find a club to employ him but doubt it will ever be a big one in future


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: bobby1 on December 09, 2012, 02:13:49 PM
Big/small club discussion is always fairly redundant, as its all relevant.  My football watching life has been the '93-94 onwards, so therefore I can't rate some teams history as highly as for example Tighty can. 



That's a good point, you get the impression that some people think Sky invented football.

absolutely, it is embarrassing the way they portray football, especially records/achievements pre the Premier league.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: George2Loose on December 09, 2012, 02:16:12 PM
Personally think Sky's coverage over the years has been excellent and contributed to the overall success of the PL.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: celtic on December 09, 2012, 02:17:27 PM
given the extent of the Scots diaspora it's hardly surprising that the two biggest Scottish clubs have a lot of far flung support.

the aussie and US 'Scots' are more likely to assert their link to the auld country by supporting whichever of the Old Firm best fits their religious and or political sense of themselves.

as for MON, daresay he'll always find a club to employ him but doubt it will ever be a big one in future

Or maybe they support the team that their family supported?

I am less religious than Kinboshi.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: bobby1 on December 09, 2012, 02:24:35 PM
Personally think Sky's coverage over the years has been excellent and contributed to the overall success of the PL.

It's a sport tho not a soap opera, you cannot just change the script of football pre 92/93 and act like it didn't happen.

I cannot think of a better example than the insistence that last years top league title was the closest title triumph ever simply because they want to ignore the game pre Prem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liverpool_0%E2%80%932_Arsenal_(26_May_1989)


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: celtic on December 09, 2012, 02:26:22 PM
Personally think Sky's coverage over the years has been excellent and contributed to the overall success of the PL.

It's a sport tho not a soap opera, you cannot just change the script of football pre 92/93 and act like it didn't happen.

I cannot think of a better example than the insistence that last years top league title was the closest title triumph ever simply because they want to ignore the game pre Prem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liverpool_0%E2%80%932_Arsenal_(26_May_1989)

Loved that game. One of the few times I have jumped out my seat, whilst watching as a neutral.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: bobby1 on December 09, 2012, 02:33:07 PM
Personally think Sky's coverage over the years has been excellent and contributed to the overall success of the PL.

It's a sport tho not a soap opera, you cannot just change the script of football pre 92/93 and act like it didn't happen.

I cannot think of a better example than the insistence that last years top league title was the closest title triumph ever simply because they want to ignore the game pre Prem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liverpool_0%E2%80%932_Arsenal_(26_May_1989)

Loved that game. One of the few times I have jumped out my seat, whilst watching as a neutral.

Could literally have been the turning point for football, after the horrors of that season the emotion was unreal. I think most neutrals wanted Arsenal to win but felt guilty because if you could have wished a happy ending for any club that season it would have been Liverpool. The title was won on goals scored after they finished level on points and goal difference yet anyone that doesn't remember this has been told repeatedly that last seasons title was the closest ever. Just putting a different name to the league doesn't change the historic days before.


and it also featured one of the few genuine sporting comms that was so simple and so perfect in Brian Moore's 'its up for grabs now' as Thomas went thru the middle and scored.

Put that perfect piece next to Phil Thompson shouting 'shoooooootttt' every 2 minutes on Soccer Saturday in an attempt to generate some fake excitement when a striker has missed by 4 yards.



Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Baron on December 09, 2012, 03:22:17 PM
Celtic and rangers are only big clubs in Scotland.

Couldn't disagree more.

They're the weakest they've ever been, but they are huge clubs.

Rangers are at the weakest they have ever been, they went into admin and ultimately liquidation and a new club was formed in the summer that now plays in the 4th tier of Scottish football.

Celtic are in the last 16 of the CL and virtually debt free, we stand to make in the region of €30m from the CLthis season. We operate on a Moneyball type model, buying low and selling high, Wanyama, Forster and Hooper were signed for a combined total of around £5m if we had to sell them we would get around £30m. We do this because of the lack of revenue generated from the SPL, the country that we play in is the only thing holding us back.

If there was a 20 team European League Celtic would absolutely be in it.


Sorry I meant in terms of personnel on the pitch. But as Celtic pointed out you have had weaker squads than your current one.

Basically Celtic and Rangers need to be in the English leagues.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: George2Loose on December 09, 2012, 03:29:21 PM
Personally think Sky's coverage over the years has been excellent and contributed to the overall success of the PL.

It's a sport tho not a soap opera, you cannot just change the script of football pre 92/93 and act like it didn't happen.

I cannot think of a better example than the insistence that last years top league title was the closest title triumph ever simply because they want to ignore the game pre Prem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liverpool_0%E2%80%932_Arsenal_(26_May_1989)

Again that's your opinion. For many, last season would have been the closest ever. Think it's a bad example of sensationalism. Was a pretty incredible end to a very close season


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Baron on December 09, 2012, 03:35:14 PM
O Neil looked shot on MOTD last night, tho the question that annoyed him was pretty crass.

What did they ask him?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: bobby1 on December 09, 2012, 03:37:16 PM
Personally think Sky's coverage over the years has been excellent and contributed to the overall success of the PL.

It's a sport tho not a soap opera, you cannot just change the script of football pre 92/93 and act like it didn't happen.

I cannot think of a better example than the insistence that last years top league title was the closest title triumph ever simply because they want to ignore the game pre Prem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liverpool_0%E2%80%932_Arsenal_(26_May_1989)

Again that's your opinion. For many, last season would have been the closest ever. Think it's a bad example of sensationalism. Was a pretty incredible end to a very close season

But they are facts not my opinion tho George, how can last years finish just be called the closest ever when there was one closer. As an example of sensationalism I could deffo have picked up many different examples, that was just the first that popped into my head.

I agree last season was an incredible finish, no doubt, but to just promote it as something it wasn't simply because they just ignore history is bad, it's not a 20 year old sport just because they want to pretend it is.



Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: George2Loose on December 09, 2012, 03:40:40 PM
Factually last season's was closer. City won it on goal difference


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: bobby1 on December 09, 2012, 03:41:55 PM
O Neil looked shot on MOTD last night, tho the question that annoyed him was pretty crass.

What did they ask him?

one of the after match questions was 'do you doubt your own position, are you filled with self doubt'...he composed himself and replied with disdain but was shaken and his lip was quivering.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 09, 2012, 03:42:13 PM
Factually last season's was closer. City won it on goal difference

Arsenal won it on goals scored, as the goal difference was identical. That's obviously closer.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: George2Loose on December 09, 2012, 03:43:34 PM
My bad


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: horseplayer on December 09, 2012, 03:43:44 PM
very rare for me but bought a load of sunday papers today

very very little coverage of o neill being under pressure if at all which considering 3 wins from 23 is amazing


certainly helps to be a media favourite at times


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: bobby1 on December 09, 2012, 03:44:32 PM
Factually last season's was closer. City won it on goal difference

I think you have misread it George, Arsenal were leading 1-0 in the last minute and scored to make it 2-0. This brought the teams level on points and goal difference so it went to the next tie breaker which was goals scored.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Baron on December 09, 2012, 03:44:44 PM
O Neil looked shot on MOTD last night, tho the question that annoyed him was pretty crass.

What did they ask him?

one of the after match questions was 'do you doubt your own position, are you filled with self doubt'...he composed himself and replied with disdain but was shaken and his lip was quivering.

Christ. Does Shreeves work for more than one channel?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 09, 2012, 03:46:06 PM
O Neil looked shot on MOTD last night, tho the question that annoyed him was pretty crass.

What did they ask him?

one of the after match questions was 'do you doubt your own position, are you filled with self doubt'...he composed himself and replied with disdain but was shaken and his lip was quivering.

Christ. Does Shreeves work for more than one channel?

LOL - I was about to post something about the stupid questions he asks players and managers on Sky.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Baron on December 09, 2012, 03:47:48 PM
O Neil looked shot on MOTD last night, tho the question that annoyed him was pretty crass.

What did they ask him?

one of the after match questions was 'do you doubt your own position, are you filled with self doubt'...he composed himself and replied with disdain but was shaken and his lip was quivering.

Christ. Does Shreeves work for more than one channel?

LOL - I was about to post something about the stupid questions he asks players and managers on Sky.

The soundbites he's employed to get is the epitomy of why I dislike Sky.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: horseplayer on December 09, 2012, 03:50:58 PM
shreeves is his own ego


the guy on motd last night is almost certainly being told to ask that sort of question

if he doesnt somebody else will


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: bobby1 on December 09, 2012, 03:55:14 PM
O Neil looked shot on MOTD last night, tho the question that annoyed him was pretty crass.

What did they ask him?

one of the after match questions was 'do you doubt your own position, are you filled with self doubt'...he composed himself and replied with disdain but was shaken and his lip was quivering.

Christ. Does Shreeves work for more than one channel?

LOL - I was about to post something about the stupid questions he asks players and managers on Sky.

The soundbites he's employed to get is the epitomy of why I dislike Sky.

+1

It epitomises everything they think sport, esp football is.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 09, 2012, 04:03:53 PM
Why did Sky pull away from the trouble at the end of the Manchester Derby?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: AndrewT on December 09, 2012, 04:52:36 PM
Why did Sky pull away from the trouble at the end of the Manchester Derby?

Hurts the 'product'.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: bobby1 on December 09, 2012, 04:55:30 PM
Why did Sky pull away from the trouble at the end of the Manchester Derby?

Hurts the 'product'.

Its the greatest league in the world......apart from the leagues that are the greatest in the world that is.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on December 09, 2012, 05:09:21 PM
O Neil looked shot on MOTD last night, tho the question that annoyed him was pretty crass.

What did they ask him?

one of the after match questions was 'do you doubt your own position, are you filled with self doubt'...he composed himself and replied with disdain but was shaken and his lip was quivering.

Christ. Does Shreeves work for more than one channel?

LOL - I was about to post something about the stupid questions he asks players and managers on Sky.

The soundbites he's employed to get is the epitomy of why I dislike Sky.

O Neil looked shot on MOTD last night, tho the question that annoyed him was pretty crass.

What did they ask him?

one of the after match questions was 'do you doubt your own position, are you filled with self doubt'...he composed himself and replied with disdain but was shaken and his lip was quivering.

Christ. Does Shreeves work for more than one channel?

LOL - I was about to post something about the stupid questions he asks players and managers on Sky.

The soundbites he's employed to get is the epitomy of why I dislike Sky.

The interview pre match with Robert Duval and Tom Cruise before the game was horrible. It was obviously set up to tell us the EPL is TGLITW when Duval went off message and started reminiscing about how Jimmy Johnstone was the greatest character he had ever come across and how he had named a dog after him. I'm not sure Shreeves even knew who was talking about.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: horseplayer on December 09, 2012, 08:24:55 PM
back to mon

tweet tonight

In January 2009 River Plate offered Falcao to Aston Villa for £7m. Martin O'Neill decided to go with Emile Heskey instead.

is a bit unfair as plenty of managers have missed out on very good players, benitez actually wanted to buy him in 2008ish and they wanted 3.5million and the yanks would not sanction it


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 09, 2012, 08:39:38 PM
Falcao scored five of Atletico's six goals tonight against Deportivo.  He's pretty good.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: horseplayer on December 09, 2012, 09:03:23 PM
infact it is very unfair as paying 7 million direct from south america is a massive risk


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 09:29:53 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kukushkin88 on December 09, 2012, 09:33:45 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.

Chelsea bigger than Celtic? By what measure? It´s just silly.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Royal Flush on December 09, 2012, 09:34:49 PM
Ha i remember a Juve match where there were less than 250 people....


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TightEnd on December 09, 2012, 09:34:58 PM
Aaron Aaron. Are you trying to troll? I'm not sure

I hold no candle for Celtic, but they are massively supported the world over. Huge in America (obv), European supporters clubs, Far East

Genuinely a big big club.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 09:35:42 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.

Chelsea bigger than Celtic? By what measure? It´s just silly.

There isn't much between them, imo.

These days if you get a European to name top European clubs, Chelsea would be there before Celtic was.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 09:37:50 PM
Aaron Aaron. Are you trying to troll? I'm not sure

I hold no candle for Celtic, but they are massively supported the world over. Huge in America (obv), European supporters clubs, Far East

Genuinely a big big club.

ha, everytime I have an opinion that is not agreed with - I am trolling? ha.

Who is to say there isn't going to be a brilliant atmosphere at other grounds for a CL match?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TightEnd on December 09, 2012, 09:42:02 PM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Marky147 on December 09, 2012, 09:43:42 PM
Aaron Aaron. Are you trying to troll? I'm not sure

I hold no candle for Celtic, but they are massively supported the world over. Huge in America (obv), European supporters clubs, Far East

Genuinely a big big club.

ha, everytime I have an opinion that is not agreed with - I am trolling? ha.

Who is to say there isn't going to be a brilliant atmosphere at other grounds for a CL match?


Think it might have been something to do with this Aaron :)

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.

Which is just incorrect, Celtic have a massive following in Ireland as well as Scotland and also they have affiliations in the UK too through Liverpool I think?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 09, 2012, 09:51:14 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.
Mwhahahahaha knock yourself out
http://www.celticbars.com/homepage.html


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 09:59:00 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.
Mwhahahahaha knock yourself out
http://www.celticbars.com/homepage.html

A list of Celtic bars - Must be massive!


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kukushkin88 on December 09, 2012, 10:10:52 PM
Aaron Aaron. Are you trying to troll? I'm not sure

I hold no candle for Celtic, but they are massively supported the world over. Huge in America (obv), European supporters clubs, Far East

Genuinely a big big club.

ha, everytime I have an opinion that is not agreed with - I am trolling? ha.

Who is to say there isn't going to be a brilliant atmosphere at other grounds for a CL match?

I think as much as anything it´s that people hope for your sake that you are trolling, if all of these opinions are your genuine considered standpoint then you have my sympathy.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 09, 2012, 10:13:21 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.
Mwhahahahaha knock yourself out
http://www.celticbars.com/homepage.html

A list of Celtic bars - Must be massive!
If you would spend a Minute reading the front page then it would tell you more than that.I don't think your a Troll as you ain't clever enough.
Nearly 400 Supporters Club Worldwide but Aaron thinks they ain't cared about outside of Scotland.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 10:27:32 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.
Mwhahahahaha knock yourself out
http://www.celticbars.com/homepage.html

A list of Celtic bars - Must be massive!
If you would spend a Minute reading the front page then it would tell you more than that.I don't think your a Troll as you ain't clever enough.
Nearly 400 Supporters Club Worldwide but Aaron thinks they ain't cared about outside of Scotland.

lol.

They aren't cared about out of Scotland though - They are just a list of supporters clubs.

Are Celtic a top 20 worldwide club?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 09, 2012, 10:31:53 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celtic_F.C._supporters


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Baron on December 09, 2012, 10:38:47 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.
Mwhahahahaha knock yourself out
http://www.celticbars.com/homepage.html

A list of Celtic bars - Must be massive!

I would take alist of their supporters clubs as a measure of a large club over your "These days if you get a European to name top European clubs, Chelsea would be there before Celtic was". What measure is that exactly?

You hammer the perfectly reasonable measures of Celtic being a top club then come out with lines like that? Blatant trolling imho.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Camel on December 09, 2012, 10:41:22 PM
Ask a random from Japan/Australia/USA/Africa to name 5 big club teams from Europe. I think it's pretty long odds he mentions Rangers or Celtic

Real, Barca, Man U, Arsenal, Liverpool, Milan, Inter, Bayern etc etc all wayyyyyyyy before Celtic and Rangers.

Fantastic clubs, but not "big" in the same way those I mentioned.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 09, 2012, 10:49:35 PM
Ask a random from Japan/Australia?USA/Africa to name 5 big club teams from Europe. I think it's pretty long odds he mentions Rangers or Celtic

Real, Barca, Man U, Arsenal, Liverpool, Milan, Inter, Bayern etc etc all wayyyyyyyy before Celtic and Rangers.

Fantastic clubs, but not "big" in the same way those I mentioned.
I don't think anyone is arguing that fact, top 20 yes but top 10 is pushing it.If we played in a League with more exposure then we would be pushing on a top 5 Club in Europe.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 10:54:02 PM
Ask a random from Japan/Australia?USA/Africa to name 5 big club teams from Europe. I think it's pretty long odds he mentions Rangers or Celtic

Real, Barca, Man U, Arsenal, Liverpool, Milan, Inter, Bayern etc etc all wayyyyyyyy before Celtic and Rangers.

Fantastic clubs, but not "big" in the same way those I mentioned.
I don't think anyone is arguing that fact, top 20 yes but top 10 is pushing it.If we played in a League with more exposure then we would be pushing on a top 5 Club in Europe.

You are sadly in dreamworld about top 5 clubs in Europe then.

Real, Barca, Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Juventus, Inter Milan, Bayern & more regardless of what league you are in.

All you keep doing is giving me links to how many fans you have.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on December 09, 2012, 10:59:22 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.

I don't know why I'm bothering but here goes

The atmosphere generated by the fans in Celtic’s stadium for our visit was the most impressive I’ve ever witnessed. The grounds of Liverpool and Manchester United are good and the hostile feeling of playing against Real Madrid in the Bernabeu is also excellent, but the atmosphere against Celtic was the best.
Xavi (Barcelona) (Sep 2004)

"Every professional footballer should seek to play at least one game at Celtic Park. I have never felt anything like it"
Paolo Maldini (AC Milan & Italy legend)

"Celtic fans are some of the greatest supporters I know," he said.
AC Milan midfielder Clarence Seedorf (Oct 2007)

"The Celtic fans are incredible. It is always great to play there."
Cristiano Ronaldo, Man U (2008)

"When I was at Porto my team also played in the UEFA Cup final against a Scottish side - but it was Celtic. I've never seen such emotional people. It was unbelievable!"
Jose Mourinho (ex-Porto Manager) looking back on thae UEFA cup final 2003 (May 2008)

"It is absolutely spectacular to see the fans like that "
Alberto Gilardino (Italian footballer)

"The Celtic fans are very special and the club and players can be very proud of them. They are the best I have ever heard"
Andres Iniesta (Barcelona Player, Oct 2012) before Celtic 2-1 Barcelona

"I have played many games for Spain/Barca but I've never heard fans like Celtic, they were amazing, not quiet for a single second!"
Andres Iniesta (Barcelona Player, Oct 2012) after Celtic 2-1 Barcelona


Aaron it's fine to have different opinions but you seem to revel in going against the grain on pretty much everything. When you are presented with evidence that contradicts your assertions you don't seem to able to take it on board at all. When you do this repeatedly people just don't respect that opinion.




Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 09, 2012, 10:59:33 PM
I actually wish we didn't have as many fans as we do as unless you goto nearly every Euro away it's very difficult to get a Ticket for the Away end at these games.

Off the top of my Head I have been to Stuttgart, Lyon, Milan x 2, Vienna, Liverpool, Man U x 2, Blackburn, Barcalona x 2  and had a Ticket from the Club for none of them.
By hook or by crook I have got into the Stadium (bar Man U once)but half of those were either a Neutral or Home end.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 09, 2012, 11:00:46 PM
Ask a random from Japan/Australia?USA/Africa to name 5 big club teams from Europe. I think it's pretty long odds he mentions Rangers or Celtic

Real, Barca, Man U, Arsenal, Liverpool, Milan, Inter, Bayern etc etc all wayyyyyyyy before Celtic and Rangers.

Fantastic clubs, but not "big" in the same way those I mentioned.
I don't think anyone is arguing that fact, top 20 yes but top 10 is pushing it.If we played in a League with more exposure then we would be pushing on a top 5 Club in Europe.

You are sadly in dreamworld about top 5 clubs in Europe then.

Real, Barca, Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Juventus, Inter Milan, Bayern & more regardless of what league you are in.

All you keep doing is giving me links to how many fans you have.
Read the post ffs


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: maccol on December 09, 2012, 11:01:01 PM
Ask a random from Japan/Australia?USA/Africa to name 5 big club teams from Europe. I think it's pretty long odds he mentions Rangers or Celtic

Real, Barca, Man U, Arsenal, Liverpool, Milan, Inter, Bayern etc etc all wayyyyyyyy before Celtic and Rangers.

Fantastic clubs, but not "big" in the same way those I mentioned.
I don't think anyone is arguing that fact, top 20 yes but top 10 is pushing it.If we played in a League with more exposure then we would be pushing on a top 5 Club in Europe.

You are sadly in dreamworld about top 5 clubs in Europe then.

Real, Barca, Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Juventus, Inter Milan, Bayern & more regardless of what league you are in.

All you keep doing is giving me links to how many fans you have.
You feeling a little bit pre-menstrual aaron?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: RickBFA on December 09, 2012, 11:01:35 PM
For some reason I always smile when I read Aaron's posts.






Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: david3103 on December 09, 2012, 11:01:58 PM
So, Martin O'Neill, job safe?
Decent record as a manager?



Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TightEnd on December 09, 2012, 11:04:37 PM
So, Martin O'Neill, job safe?
Decent record as a manager?



Possibly not

Yes, overall


Now back to celtic :-)


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on December 09, 2012, 11:05:23 PM
So, Martin O'Neill, job safe?
Decent record as a manager?



You would think he's safe for at least the next few months, he'll hoping to do some business in the window. I think he's a good fit for Sunderland. Having said that  he really needs a result against Reading on Wednesday.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 11:05:45 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.

I don't know why I'm bothering but here goes

The atmosphere generated by the fans in Celtic’s stadium for our visit was the most impressive I’ve ever witnessed. The grounds of Liverpool and Manchester United are good and the hostile feeling of playing against Real Madrid in the Bernabeu is also excellent, but the atmosphere against Celtic was the best.
Xavi (Barcelona) (Sep 2004)

"Every professional footballer should seek to play at least one game at Celtic Park. I have never felt anything like it"
Paolo Maldini (AC Milan & Italy legend)

"Celtic fans are some of the greatest supporters I know," he said.
AC Milan midfielder Clarence Seedorf (Oct 2007)

"The Celtic fans are incredible. It is always great to play there."
Cristiano Ronaldo, Man U (2008)

"When I was at Porto my team also played in the UEFA Cup final against a Scottish side - but it was Celtic. I've never seen such emotional people. It was unbelievable!"
Jose Mourinho (ex-Porto Manager) looking back on thae UEFA cup final 2003 (May 2008)

"It is absolutely spectacular to see the fans like that "
Alberto Gilardino (Italian footballer)

"The Celtic fans are very special and the club and players can be very proud of them. They are the best I have ever heard"
Andres Iniesta (Barcelona Player, Oct 2012) before Celtic 2-1 Barcelona

"I have played many games for Spain/Barca but I've never heard fans like Celtic, they were amazing, not quiet for a single second!"
Andres Iniesta (Barcelona Player, Oct 2012) after Celtic 2-1 Barcelona


Aaron it's fine to have different opinions but you seem to revel in going against the grain on pretty much everything. When you are presented with evidence that contradicts your assertions you don't seem to able to take it on board at all. When you do this repeatedly people just don't respect that opinion.




You seem to be missing the point - A great atmosphere makes you a massive club? we are discussin whether Celtic are a big club and you have replied with "atmosphere was great"

what you forget to mention that you apparently massive club got 15k (might not be accurate 100%), but you don't give us that example.

Big club? Perhaps, maybe, not not even close on the "massive" scale.

PS - Not just me saying this.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TightEnd on December 09, 2012, 11:06:38 PM
"All you keep doing is giving me links to how many fans you have."


That's the point Aaron. It's a decent measure of how big a club is. Celtic can't control which league they play in, or the strength of those they play in that league but the global supporter base is so big....

A point you don't seem to be willing to accept despite many links of evidence being shown to you


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on December 09, 2012, 11:07:34 PM
So, Martin O'Neill, job safe?
Decent record as a manager?




Now back to celtic :-)

Ha ha I said this would happen on page 1


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TightEnd on December 09, 2012, 11:09:57 PM
to be fair, 3 years ago such a debate would have been deleted in a welter of recrimination, flaming and Scottish Daveness :-)

At least the debate is civil.


Progress


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 11:11:27 PM
"All you keep doing is giving me links to how many fans you have."


That's the point Aaron. It's a decent measure of how big a club is. Celtic can't control which league they play in, or the strength of those they play in that league but the global supporter base is so big....

A point you don't seem to be willing to accept despite many links of evidence being shown to you

A club that has loads of fans that makes it massive?

If we go by that example, then we are not far behind them.

A lot more than fans make a club 'big or 'massive' - My point is that there are plenty of bigger clubs than Celtic, they are not massive.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 11:12:07 PM
Ps _ I would like to look like MON when I am 60+ :D :D


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 09, 2012, 11:12:41 PM
So your only arguement is a crowd of 15k in a Cup match against Arbroath which a lot of fans were Boycotting??


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kukushkin88 on December 09, 2012, 11:13:17 PM
Ps _ I would like to look like MON when I am 60+ :D :D

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sy3EHf82ZJU

0:50 to 0:52


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TightEnd on December 09, 2012, 11:14:06 PM
"All you keep doing is giving me links to how many fans you have."


That's the point Aaron. It's a decent measure of how big a club is. Celtic can't control which league they play in, or the strength of those they play in that league but the global supporter base is so big....

A point you don't seem to be willing to accept despite many links of evidence being shown to you

A club that has loads of fans that makes it massive?

If we go by that example, then we are not far behind them.

A lot more than fans make a club 'big or 'massive' - My point is that there are plenty of bigger clubs than Celtic, they are not massive.

Sheff Wed are a far far bigger team than Fulham, Wigan, Reading etc etc

The league you play in is less important than the core and then the casual support you have

Sheff Wed are, minimum, are top 15 big club in England


Yes, celtic are massive!


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on December 09, 2012, 11:14:32 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.

I don't know why I'm bothering but here goes

The atmosphere generated by the fans in Celtic’s stadium for our visit was the most impressive I’ve ever witnessed. The grounds of Liverpool and Manchester United are good and the hostile feeling of playing against Real Madrid in the Bernabeu is also excellent, but the atmosphere against Celtic was the best.
Xavi (Barcelona) (Sep 2004)

"Every professional footballer should seek to play at least one game at Celtic Park. I have never felt anything like it"
Paolo Maldini (AC Milan & Italy legend)

"Celtic fans are some of the greatest supporters I know," he said.
AC Milan midfielder Clarence Seedorf (Oct 2007)

"The Celtic fans are incredible. It is always great to play there."
Cristiano Ronaldo, Man U (2008)

"When I was at Porto my team also played in the UEFA Cup final against a Scottish side - but it was Celtic. I've never seen such emotional people. It was unbelievable!"
Jose Mourinho (ex-Porto Manager) looking back on thae UEFA cup final 2003 (May 2008)

"It is absolutely spectacular to see the fans like that "
Alberto Gilardino (Italian footballer)

"The Celtic fans are very special and the club and players can be very proud of them. They are the best I have ever heard"
Andres Iniesta (Barcelona Player, Oct 2012) before Celtic 2-1 Barcelona

"I have played many games for Spain/Barca but I've never heard fans like Celtic, they were amazing, not quiet for a single second!"
Andres Iniesta (Barcelona Player, Oct 2012) after Celtic 2-1 Barcelona


Aaron it's fine to have different opinions but you seem to revel in going against the grain on pretty much everything. When you are presented with evidence that contradicts your assertions you don't seem to able to take it on board at all. When you do this repeatedly people just don't respect that opinion.




You seem to be missing the point - A great atmosphere makes you a massive club? we are discussin whether Celtic are a big club and you have replied with "atmosphere was great"

what you forget to mention that you apparently massive club got 15k (might not be accurate 100%), but you don't give us that example.

Big club? Perhaps, maybe, not not even close on the "massive" scale.

PS - Not just me saying this.

This is hard work, I was answering the specific point about anyone having a better atmosphere at a CL game.

Yes there 15000 at the Arbroath game last week, I'm not sure what your point is there. The average attendance over the last 10 years or so since the stadium was reconstructed is in the mid 50000s. I could dig the actual stats out but I think I would be wasting more of my time.

Is this an attention thing with you btw?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 09, 2012, 11:14:39 PM
"All you keep doing is giving me links to how many fans you have."


That's the point Aaron. It's a decent measure of how big a club is. Celtic can't control which league they play in, or the strength of those they play in that league but the global supporter base is so big....

A point you don't seem to be willing to accept despite many links of evidence being shown to you

A club that has loads of fans that makes it massive?

If we go by that example, then we are not far behind them.

A lot more than fans make a club 'big or 'massive' - My point is that there are plenty of bigger clubs than Celtic, they are not massive.
Palace???
Ok, so what do we need to tick the Boxes of being "Big or massive"?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Baron on December 09, 2012, 11:19:41 PM
So, Martin O'Neill, job safe?
Decent record as a manager?



Yes if the board have any sense.

Yes.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Baron on December 09, 2012, 11:21:32 PM
to be fair, 3 years ago such a debate would have been deleted in a welter of recrimination, flaming and Scottish Daveness :-)

At least the debate is civil.


Progress

About the third time you've made me laugh out loud on this thread! WP Sir. :)


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 11:21:38 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.

I don't know why I'm bothering but here goes

The atmosphere generated by the fans in Celtic’s stadium for our visit was the most impressive I’ve ever witnessed. The grounds of Liverpool and Manchester United are good and the hostile feeling of playing against Real Madrid in the Bernabeu is also excellent, but the atmosphere against Celtic was the best.
Xavi (Barcelona) (Sep 2004)

"Every professional footballer should seek to play at least one game at Celtic Park. I have never felt anything like it"
Paolo Maldini (AC Milan & Italy legend)

"Celtic fans are some of the greatest supporters I know," he said.
AC Milan midfielder Clarence Seedorf (Oct 2007)

"The Celtic fans are incredible. It is always great to play there."
Cristiano Ronaldo, Man U (2008)

"When I was at Porto my team also played in the UEFA Cup final against a Scottish side - but it was Celtic. I've never seen such emotional people. It was unbelievable!"
Jose Mourinho (ex-Porto Manager) looking back on thae UEFA cup final 2003 (May 2008)

"It is absolutely spectacular to see the fans like that "
Alberto Gilardino (Italian footballer)

"The Celtic fans are very special and the club and players can be very proud of them. They are the best I have ever heard"
Andres Iniesta (Barcelona Player, Oct 2012) before Celtic 2-1 Barcelona

"I have played many games for Spain/Barca but I've never heard fans like Celtic, they were amazing, not quiet for a single second!"
Andres Iniesta (Barcelona Player, Oct 2012) after Celtic 2-1 Barcelona


Aaron it's fine to have different opinions but you seem to revel in going against the grain on pretty much everything. When you are presented with evidence that contradicts your assertions you don't seem to able to take it on board at all. When you do this repeatedly people just don't respect that opinion.




You seem to be missing the point - A great atmosphere makes you a massive club? we are discussin whether Celtic are a big club and you have replied with "atmosphere was great"

what you forget to mention that you apparently massive club got 15k (might not be accurate 100%), but you don't give us that example.

Big club? Perhaps, maybe, not not even close on the "massive" scale.

PS - Not just me saying this.

This is hard work, I was answering the specific point about anyone having a better atmosphere at a CL game.

Yes there 15000 at the Arbroath game last week, I'm not sure what your point is there. The average attendance over the last 10 years or so since the stadium was reconstructed is in the mid 50000s. I could dig the actual stats out but I think I would be wasting more of my time.

Is this an attention thing with you btw?

But for a massive club, is it not poor to ever get a 15k attendance at any point, regardless of competition?

Not attention - I just don't agree, this is after all a forum. People moan this forum is dying, then don't like it when people don't agree with each other.

Big club discussion for me is interesting, but is all a matter of viewpoint. People go on different kinds of things, had people tell me Birmingham are a bigger club than Wednesday, then I would say we are bigger or not much smaller than Man City, but they are about to blow us out of the water with success they are getting now.

But you can disagree with me all you want, but the ridic comment here is saying Celtic would be top 5 in a better league?!


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: The Baron on December 09, 2012, 11:22:45 PM
So your only arguement is a crowd of 15k in a Cup match against Arbroath which a lot of fans were Boycotting??

No you're forgetting if you ask a random bloke in Europe....


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: RickBFA on December 09, 2012, 11:23:26 PM
"All you keep doing is giving me links to how many fans you have."


That's the point Aaron. It's a decent measure of how big a club is. Celtic can't control which league they play in, or the strength of those they play in that league but the global supporter base is so big....

A point you don't seem to be willing to accept despite many links of evidence being shown to you

A club that has loads of fans that makes it massive?

If we go by that example, then we are not far behind them.

A lot more than fans make a club 'big or 'massive' - My point is that there are plenty of bigger clubs than Celtic, they are not massive.

Come on Aaron, comparing Wednesday to Celtic is just daft and I'm a Wednesday fan.

Historically Wednesday were a top ten English club. By comparison historically Celtic won the European Cup.

Have a look at their season ticket base and ours.

Honestly mate, I'd stop digging.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 11:24:48 PM
"All you keep doing is giving me links to how many fans you have."


That's the point Aaron. It's a decent measure of how big a club is. Celtic can't control which league they play in, or the strength of those they play in that league but the global supporter base is so big....

A point you don't seem to be willing to accept despite many links of evidence being shown to you

A club that has loads of fans that makes it massive?

If we go by that example, then we are not far behind them.

A lot more than fans make a club 'big or 'massive' - My point is that there are plenty of bigger clubs than Celtic, they are not massive.

Come on Aaron, comparing Wednesday to Celtic is just daft and I'm a Wednesday fan.

Historically Wednesday were a top ten English club. By comparison historically Celtic won the European Cup.

Have a look at their season ticket base and ours.

Honestly mate, I'd stop digging.

I wasn't being serious.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 09, 2012, 11:29:55 PM
So your only arguement is a crowd of 15k in a Cup match against Arbroath which a lot of fans were Boycotting??

No you're forgetting if you ask a random bloke in Europe....
I forgot about that, the ones I bump into in Europe are usually trying to get the same briefs that I am chasing :( Slovaks, Pole's, Germans, Croats etc
One of the best receptions we have ever had was actually at your place after the UEFA Cup Quarter Final (under O'Neill funny enough), proper fans.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on December 09, 2012, 11:31:53 PM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.

I don't know why I'm bothering but here goes

The atmosphere generated by the fans in Celtic’s stadium for our visit was the most impressive I’ve ever witnessed. The grounds of Liverpool and Manchester United are good and the hostile feeling of playing against Real Madrid in the Bernabeu is also excellent, but the atmosphere against Celtic was the best.
Xavi (Barcelona) (Sep 2004)

"Every professional footballer should seek to play at least one game at Celtic Park. I have never felt anything like it"
Paolo Maldini (AC Milan & Italy legend)

"Celtic fans are some of the greatest supporters I know," he said.
AC Milan midfielder Clarence Seedorf (Oct 2007)

"The Celtic fans are incredible. It is always great to play there."
Cristiano Ronaldo, Man U (2008)

"When I was at Porto my team also played in the UEFA Cup final against a Scottish side - but it was Celtic. I've never seen such emotional people. It was unbelievable!"
Jose Mourinho (ex-Porto Manager) looking back on thae UEFA cup final 2003 (May 2008)

"It is absolutely spectacular to see the fans like that "
Alberto Gilardino (Italian footballer)

"The Celtic fans are very special and the club and players can be very proud of them. They are the best I have ever heard"
Andres Iniesta (Barcelona Player, Oct 2012) before Celtic 2-1 Barcelona

"I have played many games for Spain/Barca but I've never heard fans like Celtic, they were amazing, not quiet for a single second!"
Andres Iniesta (Barcelona Player, Oct 2012) after Celtic 2-1 Barcelona


Aaron it's fine to have different opinions but you seem to revel in going against the grain on pretty much everything. When you are presented with evidence that contradicts your assertions you don't seem to able to take it on board at all. When you do this repeatedly people just don't respect that opinion.




You seem to be missing the point - A great atmosphere makes you a massive club? we are discussin whether Celtic are a big club and you have replied with "atmosphere was great"

what you forget to mention that you apparently massive club got 15k (might not be accurate 100%), but you don't give us that example.

Big club? Perhaps, maybe, not not even close on the "massive" scale.

PS - Not just me saying this.

This is hard work, I was answering the specific point about anyone having a better atmosphere at a CL game.

Yes there 15000 at the Arbroath game last week, I'm not sure what your point is there. The average attendance over the last 10 years or so since the stadium was reconstructed is in the mid 50000s. I could dig the actual stats out but I think I would be wasting more of my time.

Is this an attention thing with you btw?

But for a massive club, is it not poor to ever get a 15k attendance at any point, regardless of competition?

Not attention - I just don't agree, this is after all a forum. People moan this forum is dying, then don't like it when people don't agree with each other.

Big club discussion for me is interesting, but is all a matter of viewpoint. People go on different kinds of things, had people tell me Birmingham are a bigger club than Wednesday, then I would say we are bigger or not much smaller than Man City, but they are about to blow us out of the water with success they are getting now.

But you can disagree with me all you want, but the ridic comment here is saying Celtic would be top 5 in a better league?!

I've given you a 10 year average but you concentrate on a 15000 against lower league opposition in a cup tie. The top 5 quote wasn't mine it's not one I agree with. I said a few pages back if there was a 20 team Euro League Celtic would be in it.

The attention question was because you remind me very much of Scottish Daves posting style and I know he was doing it for attention


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: aaron1867 on December 09, 2012, 11:41:21 PM
I'm not really focusing on the 15k, I am using it as an example to show that the massive clubs do not get these sort of crowds.

With your point about a 20 team league, what would you class it on? Would you put Man City in?

Valencia, Roma, At Madrid, Newcastle, Werder Bremen, Bayern Lev, are they bigger than Celtic?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Rod Paradise on December 09, 2012, 11:42:12 PM
Aaron keeps going on about 15k at a match v Div 2 opposition just before a vital CL group match. I'm amazed he knew about it, since he'd not be interested in a small club from Scotland.....


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 09, 2012, 11:50:23 PM
Aaron keeps going on about 15k at a match v Div 2 opposition just before a vital CL group match. I'm amazed he knew about it, since he'd not be interested in a small club from Scotland.....
Just the Man.Looking for Ticket for Hibs away for a Family friend over from Ireland if you come across any spare:)


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Rod Paradise on December 10, 2012, 12:26:06 AM
Aaron keeps going on about 15k at a match v Div 2 opposition just before a vital CL group match. I'm amazed he knew about it, since he'd not be interested in a small club from Scotland.....
Just the Man.Looking for Ticket for Hibs away for a Family friend over from Ireland if you come across any spare:)

We didn't get any - but if I hear of a single one I'll pick it up for you.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: rfgqqabc on December 10, 2012, 01:57:24 AM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.

It depends on the definition. If we use historical data or fan base they are a big prefer some sort of relative ranking of power/success, which means Celtic aren't exactly the biggest about. Mentioning fan base earlier Celtic having support in America was obvious but I'd had ignored. Do they really get support in Asia? I saw man u Chelsea Liverpool Madrid Barcelona arsenal but never Celtic


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: rfgqqabc on December 10, 2012, 02:10:23 AM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.

It depends on the definition. If we use historical data or fan base they are a big prefer some sort of relative ranking of power/success, which means Celtic aren't exactly the biggest about. Mentioning fan base earlier Celtic having support in America was obvious but I'd had ignored. Do they really get support in Asia? I saw man u Chelsea Liverpool Madrid Barcelona arsenal but never Celtic

Furthermore the idea of the number of bars dictating the size of the club is just ridiculous. I mean if get a 100 rovers fans to go and make themed bars will you listen to my arguments that Doncaster is a big club. Celtic have a number of bars because they have had success as a theme, not because the club is big.

Are Leeds/Wednesday and more importantly forest big clubs because of historical performance? Would you agree Porto are a big club? Especially as I imagine they get some interest from south America etc. Benefica as big a club as Celtic? Less bars for sure!


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 10, 2012, 04:01:35 AM
as a Sunderland fan i hope we dont get rid of him, the squad he has is still the complete dross that Steve Bruce managed to bring in

that said i think the team selections have been terrible this season. Adam John needs to play down the left, we need (i dont know who, maybe conor whickham) playing upfront alongside fletcher, and sessagnon playing deeper so we can actually get some supplies to the strikers. the counter attacking strategy that worked for 10 game last season just isnt working, especially when we decide to concede after 10 minutes in every game.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Snowball on December 10, 2012, 07:12:04 AM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.

It depends on the definition. If we use historical data or fan base they are a big prefer some sort of relative ranking of power/success, which means Celtic aren't exactly the biggest about. Mentioning fan base earlier Celtic having support in America was obvious but I'd had ignored. Do they really get support in Asia? I saw man u Chelsea Liverpool Madrid Barcelona arsenal but never Celtic

Furthermore the idea of the number of bars dictating the size of the club is just ridiculous. I mean if get a 100 rovers fans to go and make themed bars will you listen to my arguments that Doncaster is a big club. Celtic have a number of bars because they have had success as a theme, not because the club is big.

Are Leeds/Wednesday and more importantly forest big clubs because of historical performance? Would you agree Porto are a big club? Especially as I imagine they get some interest from south America etc. Benefica as big a club as Celtic? Less bars for sure!
As i pointed out to Aaron when he couldn't be arsed reading the front page it was more to do with the amount of Worldwide Supporters Clubs.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: rfgqqabc on December 10, 2012, 07:35:51 AM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.

It depends on the definition. If we use historical data or fan base they are a big prefer some sort of relative ranking of power/success, which means Celtic aren't exactly the biggest about. Mentioning fan base earlier Celtic having support in America was obvious but I'd had ignored. Do they really get support in Asia? I saw man u Chelsea Liverpool Madrid Barcelona arsenal but never Celtic

Furthermore the idea of the number of bars dictating the size of the club is just ridiculous. I mean if get a 100 rovers fans to go and make themed bars will you listen to my arguments that Doncaster is a big club. Celtic have a number of bars because they have had success as a theme, not because the club is big.

Are Leeds/Wednesday and more importantly forest big clubs because of historical performance? Would you agree Porto are a big club? Especially as I imagine they get some interest from south America etc. Benefica as big a club as Celtic? Less bars for sure!
As i pointed out to Aaron when he couldn't be arsed reading the front page it was more to do with the amount of Worldwide Supporters Clubs.

Will concede that point, posting from my phone. That's my excuse and I'm sticking to it!


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kukushkin88 on December 10, 2012, 08:59:46 AM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.

It depends on the definition. If we use historical data or fan base they are a big prefer some sort of relative ranking of power/success, which means Celtic aren't exactly the biggest about. Mentioning fan base earlier Celtic having support in America was obvious but I'd had ignored. Do they really get support in Asia? I saw man u Chelsea Liverpool Madrid Barcelona arsenal but never Celtic

Furthermore the idea of the number of bars dictating the size of the club is just ridiculous. I mean if get a 100 rovers fans to go and make themed bars will you listen to my arguments that Doncaster is a big club. Celtic have a number of bars because they have had success as a theme, not because the club is big.

Are Leeds/Wednesday and more importantly forest big clubs because of historical performance? Would you agree Porto are a big club? Especially as I imagine they get some interest from south America etc. Benefica as big a club as Celtic? Less bars for sure!

The big club debate is silly on so many levels but 100 Celtic Supporters Club bars worldwide is indicative that they are a big club. The point about if you got 100 Rovers fans to open themed bars is moot, as you couldn´t do it. There are lots of reasons for this one of which that the club is a small club and has no worldwide appeal.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 10, 2012, 09:22:29 AM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.

It depends on the definition. If we use historical data or fan base they are a big prefer some sort of relative ranking of power/success, which means Celtic aren't exactly the biggest about. Mentioning fan base earlier Celtic having support in America was obvious but I'd had ignored. Do they really get support in Asia? I saw man u Chelsea Liverpool Madrid Barcelona arsenal but never Celtic

LOL - Celtic have an estimated 10 million fans in Japan, which is in Asia last time I checked.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 10, 2012, 09:24:24 AM
Fan base is clearly a good measure, not the measure but a good one.

and Celtic are clearly a massive club, you only need to look at any home Champions League match to see that.

But this is pretty pointed at all clubs, no? Anyone can have a better atmosphere on a CL match.

What you forget to mention is when there support is pretty poor, apparently they got 15k in a cup match at the weeken? Would these massive clubs ever get 15k in any sort of match?

Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Barca, Madrid, Bayern, Ajax, Juve, Milan, Inter & others, do they ever get 15k?

The fact is that Celtic are not cared about anywhere other than Scotland.

I don't know why I'm bothering but here goes

The atmosphere generated by the fans in Celtic’s stadium for our visit was the most impressive I’ve ever witnessed. The grounds of Liverpool and Manchester United are good and the hostile feeling of playing against Real Madrid in the Bernabeu is also excellent, but the atmosphere against Celtic was the best.
Xavi (Barcelona) (Sep 2004)

"Every professional footballer should seek to play at least one game at Celtic Park. I have never felt anything like it"
Paolo Maldini (AC Milan & Italy legend)

"Celtic fans are some of the greatest supporters I know," he said.
AC Milan midfielder Clarence Seedorf (Oct 2007)

"The Celtic fans are incredible. It is always great to play there."
Cristiano Ronaldo, Man U (2008)

"When I was at Porto my team also played in the UEFA Cup final against a Scottish side - but it was Celtic. I've never seen such emotional people. It was unbelievable!"
Jose Mourinho (ex-Porto Manager) looking back on thae UEFA cup final 2003 (May 2008)

"It is absolutely spectacular to see the fans like that "
Alberto Gilardino (Italian footballer)

"The Celtic fans are very special and the club and players can be very proud of them. They are the best I have ever heard"
Andres Iniesta (Barcelona Player, Oct 2012) before Celtic 2-1 Barcelona

"I have played many games for Spain/Barca but I've never heard fans like Celtic, they were amazing, not quiet for a single second!"
Andres Iniesta (Barcelona Player, Oct 2012) after Celtic 2-1 Barcelona


Aaron it's fine to have different opinions but you seem to revel in going against the grain on pretty much everything. When you are presented with evidence that contradicts your assertions you don't seem to able to take it on board at all. When you do this repeatedly people just don't respect that opinion.




You seem to be missing the point - A great atmosphere makes you a massive club? we are discussin whether Celtic are a big club and you have replied with "atmosphere was great"

what you forget to mention that you apparently massive club got 15k (might not be accurate 100%), but you don't give us that example.

Big club? Perhaps, maybe, not not even close on the "massive" scale.

PS - Not just me saying this.

This is hard work, I was answering the specific point about anyone having a better atmosphere at a CL game.

Yes there 15000 at the Arbroath game last week, I'm not sure what your point is there. The average attendance over the last 10 years or so since the stadium was reconstructed is in the mid 50000s. I could dig the actual stats out but I think I would be wasting more of my time.

Is this an attention thing with you btw?

But for a massive club, is it not poor to ever get a 15k attendance at any point, regardless of competition?

Not attention - I just don't agree, this is after all a forum. People moan this forum is dying, then don't like it when people don't agree with each other.

Big club discussion for me is interesting, but is all a matter of viewpoint. People go on different kinds of things, had people tell me Birmingham are a bigger club than Wednesday, then I would say we are bigger or not much smaller than Man City, but they are about to blow us out of the water with success they are getting now.

But you can disagree with me all you want, but the ridic comment here is saying Celtic would be top 5 in a better league?!

Aaron, can you just clarify which team you're claiming are bigger than Man City?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Rod Paradise on December 10, 2012, 09:38:57 AM
as a Sunderland fan i hope we dont get rid of him, the squad he has is still the complete dross that Steve Bruce managed to bring in

that said i think the team selections have been terrible this season. Adam John needs to play down the left, we need (i dont know who, maybe conor whickham) playing upfront alongside fletcher, and sessagnon playing deeper so we can actually get some supplies to the strikers. the counter attacking strategy that worked for 10 game last season just isnt working, especially when we decide to concede after 10 minutes in every game.

One thing with MON - he's stubborn on his team selections. There were times at Celtic were I was sure he was making selections just to show the fans couldn't sway him. In his favour his decisions usually worked out in the long run and proved him right.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Rod Paradise on December 10, 2012, 09:41:52 AM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.

It depends on the definition. If we use historical data or fan base they are a big prefer some sort of relative ranking of power/success, which means Celtic aren't exactly the biggest about. Mentioning fan base earlier Celtic having support in America was obvious but I'd had ignored. Do they really get support in Asia? I saw man u Chelsea Liverpool Madrid Barcelona arsenal but never Celtic

LOL - Celtic have an estimated 10 million fans in Japan, which is in Asia last time I checked.

That might have dropped since Nakamura left though.... Got a lot of attention/news lately in Thailand as well - mainly through charitable links to a school in Thailand. According to a Rangers fan I know who goes to Thailand regular the Celtic top is commonly seen, as much as Man Utd/Chelsea/Barca/Real.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 10, 2012, 09:55:49 AM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.

It depends on the definition. If we use historical data or fan base they are a big prefer some sort of relative ranking of power/success, which means Celtic aren't exactly the biggest about. Mentioning fan base earlier Celtic having support in America was obvious but I'd had ignored. Do they really get support in Asia? I saw man u Chelsea Liverpool Madrid Barcelona arsenal but never Celtic

LOL - Celtic have an estimated 10 million fans in Japan, which is in Asia last time I checked.

That might have dropped since Nakamura left though.... Got a lot of attention/news lately in Thailand as well - mainly through charitable links to a school in Thailand. According to a Rangers fan I know who goes to Thailand regular the Celtic top is commonly seen, as much as Man Utd/Chelsea/Barca/Real.

Nah, they pick a team because of a player joining like that and they stick with it.  I remember the popularity of Roma in Japan because Nakata played there for one season.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Rubbish2407 on December 10, 2012, 11:28:00 AM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.

It depends on the definition. If we use historical data or fan base they are a big prefer some sort of relative ranking of power/success, which means Celtic aren't exactly the biggest about. Mentioning fan base earlier Celtic having support in America was obvious but I'd had ignored. Do they really get support in Asia? I saw man u Chelsea Liverpool Madrid Barcelona arsenal but never Celtic

LOL - Celtic have an estimated 10 million fans in Japan, which is in Asia last time I checked.

There's only 120 million people in Japan so you're saying one in every twelve people support Celtic? Really?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: david3103 on December 10, 2012, 11:35:35 AM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.

It depends on the definition. If we use historical data or fan base they are a big prefer some sort of relative ranking of power/success, which means Celtic aren't exactly the biggest about. Mentioning fan base earlier Celtic having support in America was obvious but I'd had ignored. Do they really get support in Asia? I saw man u Chelsea Liverpool Madrid Barcelona arsenal but never Celtic

LOL - Celtic have an estimated 10 million fans in Japan, which is in Asia last time I checked.

There's only 120 million people in Japan so you're saying one in every twelve people support Celtic? Really?

It's a lot more than one in twelve in Glasgow


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 10, 2012, 11:39:05 AM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.

It depends on the definition. If we use historical data or fan base they are a big prefer some sort of relative ranking of power/success, which means Celtic aren't exactly the biggest about. Mentioning fan base earlier Celtic having support in America was obvious but I'd had ignored. Do they really get support in Asia? I saw man u Chelsea Liverpool Madrid Barcelona arsenal but never Celtic

LOL - Celtic have an estimated 10 million fans in Japan, which is in Asia last time I checked.

There's only 120 million people in Japan so you're saying one in every twelve people support Celtic? Really?

They probably support more than one side, but yes.  In Japan they'll show J-League matches on the news reports and also teams that have a Japanese player.  So you'd get J-League matches on the news, then clips of Celtic matches! 

Here's another example.  Baseball is massive in Japan, and when Hideki Irabu signed for the Yankees it was major league news over there (see what I did?). Every day there was a news story about him, the front/back pages of the newspapers would be all about him.  He was easily the biggest sports star in Japan at the end of the 90s.  There were also probably tens of millions of Yankees supporters at the time in Japan, and once people buy the shirts and the other stuff they tend to stay as fans for a while after as well.

At the same time as Irabu's popularity, Nakata played for Roma and then Parma. His move to Roma was massive news and it seemed like 1 in 5 school-kids had Roma shirts (and the ones who didn't had the Japanese kit with Nakata on the back).  I'm sure Bolton had a popularity surge when Nakata signed for them on loan even though he only scored once or twice.

When Nakamura was at Celtic, the effect in Japan would have been enormous.  I'm sure that Celtic matches would be live on TV over there.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Rubbish2407 on December 10, 2012, 11:48:54 AM
Okay, I believe you I think.

Going on the demographics of my house, myself, Wife and Daughter, I can confirm that 66% of our household couldn't give a flying **** about Football and I'm only moderately interested for betting purposes.

There's roughly 64 million women in Japan. You reckon over 5 million of them support Celtic?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Rod Paradise on December 10, 2012, 11:51:05 AM
Games were live, there were reporters permanently stationed in Glasgow from Japan & the Celtic website had a  special Japanese translation. Saw tourists at the games regularly loaded down with bags from the Celtic shop. He certainly made the club money, as well as scoring that goal against Man Utd.

Edit:  Found a link where it was estimated at 7 million:

http://www.webcitation.org/1312942062265411 (http://www.webcitation.org/1312942062265411)

Quote
Celtic football club a real hit with Japanese fans
Published: 16 February 2009 12:00

According to sports marketing agency, SportsRevolution, there are currently over seven million Japanese adults who are fans of Celtic football club – that is two million more fans than there are people in Scotland.

Japanese interest in football has risen since they jointly hosted the 2002 world cup, with South Korea, and when Japanese footballer, Shunsuke Nakamura joined Celtic Football club in 2005 the Glasgow club gained thousands of new fans from Japan. That fan base has been growing ever since and there is even a Japan based fan group – the Tokyo Supporters of Celtic Football Club.

These figures are also backed up by the interest in advertising space at their games. Antony Marcou, Managing Director of SportsRevolution said: “Japan is the most expensive market to advertise in the world. The cost per thousand impacts prohibits many advertisers from targeting Japan properly. Using Celtic's fan base, like Goldsmiths have done, to talk to a Japanese audience is not only innovative but extremely media efficient.”

But why the huge fascination with football and with a UK club? With the latest 0 – 0 result at the Celtic Vs Rangers game last Sunday to reflect upon, we asked experts in the field; Dr Hiroki Ogasawara from Kobe University and Professor Les Back from Goldsmiths, University of London.

Dr Hiroki Ogasawara, Goldsmiths alumnus and current Associate Professor at Kobe University in Japan, comments:

Why do you think so many Japanese football fans support Celtic?
I think that it's solely because of Shunsuke's transfer to Celtic and his good performance on the pitch. And I have to tell you that it's not about Celtic and their history and culture but Shunsuke himself that many Japanese fans are attracted to Celtic. In addition, it's because of the peculiarity of Celtic's cultural syncretism with Irishness. When Japan co-host the world cup in 2002, Irish fans were really great and they left a good legacy as to how to enjoy the game. They behaved well, and made a good effort to link together with Japanese supporters. Celtic's colour appeals to those who have a fond memory of that time.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 10, 2012, 11:51:42 AM
Okay, I believe you I think.

Going on the demographics of my house, myself, Wife and Daughter, I can confirm that 66% of our household couldn't give a flying **** about Football and I'm only moderately interested for betting purposes.

There's roughly 64 million women in Japan. You reckon over 5 million of them support Celtic?

If you asked them which football team they like/support - I'm sure a lot would say Celtic.  I'm sure a lot would say Dortmund and Man U, with the latter number increasing for obvious reasons.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 10, 2012, 11:53:50 AM
Got to remember, we're talking about Japan here.  It's a very different place to most other countries.  Where else could you have a pop group like this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AKB48


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Rubbish2407 on December 10, 2012, 11:55:36 AM
I did actually read about a reporter who traveled over from Japan to watch Rangers only for the game to be cancelled.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2239086/Japanese-journalist-travels-6000-miles-report-Rangers-Elgin-City-game-called-off.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2239086/Japanese-journalist-travels-6000-miles-report-Rangers-Elgin-City-game-called-off.html)


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 10, 2012, 12:01:02 PM
I did actually read about a reporter who traveled over from Japan to watch Rangers only for the game to be cancelled.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2239086/Japanese-journalist-travels-6000-miles-report-Rangers-Elgin-City-game-called-off.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2239086/Japanese-journalist-travels-6000-miles-report-Rangers-Elgin-City-game-called-off.html)

:D

I bet he's not a Rangers fan now, even if he was before!


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: DungBeetle on December 10, 2012, 12:07:43 PM
Surely "big club" definitions should be done on average attendances or number of season ticket holders in the last 10 years?

Not some Japanese housewife who might have Celtic as her 3rd team behind Grampus 8 and Man United?

Obviously Celtic will score well on my definition, as I would agree they are a truely massive club, unfortunately stuck in an uncompetitive league.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Rod Paradise on December 10, 2012, 12:08:00 PM
I did actually read about a reporter who traveled over from Japan to watch Rangers only for the game to be cancelled.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2239086/Japanese-journalist-travels-6000-miles-report-Rangers-Elgin-City-game-called-off.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2239086/Japanese-journalist-travels-6000-miles-report-Rangers-Elgin-City-game-called-off.html)

:D

I bet he's not a Rangers fan now, even if he was before!

I see he was one of the reporters based here when Naka was at Celtic.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: DungBeetle on December 10, 2012, 12:10:32 PM
"At the same time as Irabu's popularity, Nakata played for Roma and then Parma. His move to Roma was massive news and it seemed like 1 in 5 school-kids had Roma shirts (and the ones who didn't had the Japanese kit with Nakata on the back).  I'm sure Bolton had a popularity surge when Nakata signed for them on loan even though he only scored once or twice."

All true but you are confusing people supporting a player/idol as opposed to any fondness for Roma.  Do you think they still buy the new Roma shirts each year?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Rod Paradise on December 10, 2012, 12:10:55 PM
Surely "big club" definitions should be done on average attendances or number of season ticket holders in the last 10 years?

Not some Japanese housewife who might have Celtic as her 3rd team behind Grampus 8 and Man United?

Obviously Celtic will score well on my definition, as I would agree they are a truely massive club, unfortunately stuck in an uncompetitive league.

Aye, things have taken a wee diversion. And according to Aaron it's decided by lowest home gate you can find.....



Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 10, 2012, 12:47:12 PM
"At the same time as Irabu's popularity, Nakata played for Roma and then Parma. His move to Roma was massive news and it seemed like 1 in 5 school-kids had Roma shirts (and the ones who didn't had the Japanese kit with Nakata on the back).  I'm sure Bolton had a popularity surge when Nakata signed for them on loan even though he only scored once or twice."

All true but you are confusing people supporting a player/idol as opposed to any fondness for Roma.  Do you think they still buy the new Roma shirts each year?

No.  So can you give me your definition of 'fan' please?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: DungBeetle on December 10, 2012, 12:51:12 PM
Fan = someone who supports a team for an enduring period in my opinion.  Not necessarily who will come to games regularly but will provide revenue for the organistion on at least a sporadic ongoing basis. 


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 10, 2012, 12:55:56 PM
Fan = someone who supports a team for an enduring period in my opinion.  Not necessarily who will come to games regularly but will provide revenue for the organistion on at least a sporadic ongoing basis. 

You've definied a 'customer'.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: horseplayer on December 10, 2012, 12:56:25 PM
as far as i am aware generally asian fans follow players rather than teams


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: DungBeetle on December 10, 2012, 01:25:10 PM
"You've definied a 'customer'."

No - a one off purchase is a customer.  It is the ongoing nature of the custom which makes a fan.

All fans are customers.  Not all customers are fans.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 10, 2012, 01:39:17 PM
"You've definied a 'customer'."

No - a one off purchase is a customer.  It is the ongoing nature of the custom which makes a fan.

All fans are customers.  Not all customers are fans.

But I don't need to buy anything at all to be a fan.  I don't think providing ongoing revenue for the club is a necessary part of being a fan.  I'm a fan of various sporting clubs and sporting individuals.  I don't provide all of them revenue.  Does that make me not a fan of theirs?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on December 10, 2012, 01:41:12 PM
(and I'm not a fan of Martin O'Neill)


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: DungBeetle on December 10, 2012, 02:00:55 PM
Accept your point on some fans not making purchases.  But I think even fans who don't purchase impact Revenue.  If I can demonstrate I have 2 million extra long term fans in country XYZ I can drive a harder bargain in TV rights for that nation.  Even if those fans don't buy merchandise they are still contributing.

My point is I don't class temporary allegiences as being a fan.  Since Watford have been taken over I keep an eye on Udinese results, and I may even buy a shirt.  But I am not a fan.  If the link breaks I won't check their results and the shirt would be in the bottom of the cupboard.  However, I consider myself a fan of the Patriots even though I have never bought a single thing from them as I watch their games whenever they are on Sky and have done for about 10 years.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: DungBeetle on December 10, 2012, 02:07:53 PM
By the way I am aware I have shifted my definition as we go along :)


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: rfgqqabc on December 10, 2012, 02:25:20 PM
I was just wondering Aaron :-) Of course you can say your opinions but when its so left field I scratch my head and wonder if you are looking for a rise.

I'm not implying lots of clubs won't have great CL atmospheres, so don't twist it

Just genuinely shocked (in a what does it matter anyway kind of way) that you think they aren't a big club! Same goes for Messrs Picken and Langley who think the same.

It depends on the definition. If we use historical data or fan base they are a big prefer some sort of relative ranking of power/success, which means Celtic aren't exactly the biggest about. Mentioning fan base earlier Celtic having support in America was obvious but I'd had ignored. Do they really get support in Asia? I saw man u Chelsea Liverpool Madrid Barcelona arsenal but never Celtic

LOL - Celtic have an estimated 10 million fans in Japan, which is in Asia last time I checked.

It has a question mark at the end. I know I don't know everything.

Interesting about the asian fans. Big club definition is tough and so is the fan one. I think the convergence of the definition dung and Kin showed is something I'd agree with.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: outragous76 on December 10, 2012, 02:42:04 PM
Really this thread? Really?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Boba Fett on December 16, 2012, 06:03:46 AM
hilarity everywhere.  Hello to the guys that came out of retirement to post on this thread btw


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: david3103 on December 26, 2012, 07:37:14 PM
MO'N did ok today


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: George2Loose on March 30, 2013, 09:48:25 PM
BIKE TIME


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TightEnd on March 30, 2013, 09:51:23 PM
Woah....

I just got a little excited, just on the off-chance that we just might....


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: action man on March 30, 2013, 10:09:03 PM
you dont want him. Said ages ago in the thread he was the most overrated manager of all time, and he still will be


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: rfgqqabc on March 30, 2013, 10:10:04 PM
A very astute football judge had a post on another forum talking about MON, team selection, and his pressing style. He said this meant they were worth laying towards the end of the season. Unsurprisingly, he is a massive winner lifetime. Can't believe I forgot tbh. 7 on the bounce since Feb, 2/13 since Christmas. Oops on my behalf.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: horseplayer on March 30, 2013, 10:41:58 PM
saint martin

no doubt will get another job somewere when he wants it


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: buzzharvey22 on March 31, 2013, 12:44:34 AM
i love the bloke, don't have any animosity at all towards him

dont think him leaving will make any difference at the moment, but im not dissapointed at the same time

i personally cant see us scoring another goal, never mind getting another win this season

weve been the worst team in the league this year as far as im concerned, think when we beat west ham 3-0 at home and reading 3-0 at home are the only games this season when weve been the better team.

dont think weve got any good young players coming up through the academy either so relegation may be absolutly dreadfull for us, and probably not gonna come back up quickly as we have done for the past 20 years

ah well, lets just hope we dont get beat 5-1 in the derby again, dont think i could put up with any more "5under1and" and "smb" facebook status'es 



Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: mondatoo on March 31, 2013, 03:08:53 AM
Why sack him ? Fan of his or not no way can they get better.

I don't want Sunderland to go down, finish 17th and we take 6 points and I'm loving life.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Ant040689 on March 31, 2013, 11:46:24 AM
you dont want him. Said ages ago in the thread he was the most overrated manager of all time, and he still will be

Had a go at you on FB a while ago for this, but you are right in that he has been ineffective for Sunderland. Had a spell where I thought he was turning it around, but as was said by Alan Shearer on MOTD, coming back into management for Sunderland after the time gone, he doesn't look the same enthusiastic man. I hope he gets that back and takes his next team forward in much the same way he has shown he is capable of doing in the past.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: 77dave on March 31, 2013, 01:34:20 PM
steve mclaren fav for the job


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: mulhuzz on March 31, 2013, 03:04:07 PM
Why sack him ? Fan of his or not no way can they get better.

I don't want Sunderland to go down, finish 17th and we take 6 points and I'm loving life.

This.

Would rather ensure old saggy chops is relegated with QPR than have Mackems go down.

MO'N never really done anything since Leicester. Weird because when he talks as pundit he's so good.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: pleno1 on March 31, 2013, 04:17:04 PM
they have to fire him, hes clueless, they can get somebody in ready for the derby which is one of the most important derbies in the last 50 years. with MON they were drawing dead.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: redarmi on March 31, 2013, 04:31:17 PM


MO'N never really done anything since Leicester. Weird because when he talks as pundit he's so good.

Really?  The season before he took over at Celtic they finished 21 points behind Rangers.  The next season they won the treble, then retained the title and got to a European final.  He was at Celtic for five years and won 3 titles and came second twice.  He also won the Scottish cup three times.  Then he went to Villa and finished 6th three years in a row and took them to their first final in years.  Not really done much......


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: horseplayer on March 31, 2013, 04:40:55 PM
John Robertson a massive miss it seems

certainly did 80% of the coaching work at villa

Even though i am not a fan he looks to have last his spark of late and without robertson his "style" is probably nowhere near as effective



Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on March 31, 2013, 04:46:00 PM
John Robertson a massive miss it seems

certainly did 80% of the coaching work at villa

Even though i am not a fan he looks to have last his spark of late and without robertson his "style" is probably nowhere near as effective



Walford does the vast majority of the coaching, Robertson was more of a social convener.

MONs wife was in very poor health when he left Celtic, I'm not sure if that's given him a new perspective, he certainly doesn't seem to have the spark as others have said.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: horseplayer on March 31, 2013, 04:49:18 PM
John Robertson a massive miss it seems

certainly did 80% of the coaching work at villa

Even though i am not a fan he looks to have last his spark of late and without robertson his "style" is probably nowhere near as effective



Walford does the vast majority of the coaching, Robertson was more of a social convener.

MONs wife was in very poor health when he left Celtic, I'm not sure if that's given him a new perspective, he certainly doesn't seem to have the spark as others have said.

yes that would be a very valid reason obviously

the person who told me that worked with villas younger players so maybe robertson was mainly with them

either way he was an important part of the setup


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on March 31, 2013, 05:01:38 PM
John Robertson a massive miss it seems

certainly did 80% of the coaching work at villa

Even though i am not a fan he looks to have last his spark of late and without robertson his "style" is probably nowhere near as effective




Walford does the vast majority of the coaching, Robertson was more of a social convener.

MONs wife was in very poor health when he left Celtic, I'm not sure if that's given him a new perspective, he certainly doesn't seem to have the spark as others have said.

yes that would be a very valid reason obviously

the person who told me that worked with villas younger players so maybe robertson was mainly with them

either way he was an important part of the setup

Absolutely, it was a partnership that worked very well.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on March 31, 2013, 05:02:09 PM
Were saying on Sky that Di Canio is up in the North East to discuss the job at Sunderland.

Is he really what they need?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: TightEnd on March 31, 2013, 05:11:55 PM


MO'N never really done anything since Leicester. Weird because when he talks as pundit he's so good.

Really?  The season before he took over at Celtic they finished 21 points behind Rangers.  The next season they won the treble, then retained the title and got to a European final.  He was at Celtic for five years and won 3 titles and came second twice.  He also won the Scottish cup three times.  Then he went to Villa and finished 6th three years in a row and took them to their first final in years.  Not really done much......

Precisely

Villa were bottom 10 under O'Leary.

Lerner invested, MON had them consistently top 6

Wanted finance to take it to next stage, Lerner declined and has seemd to lose interest in funding a team that compete in the top half since.MON left

Agree about Robertson, and MON's spark recently


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: MANTIS01 on March 31, 2013, 07:14:35 PM
I think MON would work better in tandem with a technical director who took care of business while he worked his magic on the traning ground. Personally I think the guy has outstanding ability but also has a major weakness with player recruitment. Sunderland have struggled in recent times because they never replaced Bent. When Bent left they needed a 20-goals-a-season-goal-getting-machine and MON addresed that this season by spending multiple millions on Fletcher and Graham. His record in the transfer market throughout his career is very much hit and miss. That said Sunderland could have tweeked around with structure rather than sack him altogether because anybody they bring in will be a step backwards imo. Gambling on unproven managers at this level would be quite ridiculous, reminds me of MM at Wolves.   


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Alverton on March 31, 2013, 07:44:40 PM
MO'N never really done anything since Leicester.

Lol wut?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: horseplayer on March 31, 2013, 07:48:10 PM
the villa thing is still hard to say was "great" considering they constantly had the 4th or at times even 3rd highest wage bill in the league at the time (as well as a very nice transfer kitty)

the league was quite different then as well with the top 4 or even six not as much of a closed shop

some of the wages squad players were/are on from his reign at villa are frightening

he also seems happiest buying british players for whatever reason which is never going to be very easy to prove good business in



Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on March 31, 2013, 10:04:08 PM
Di Canio confirmed.

http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/article/2/8610654/di-canio-named-sunderland-boss


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Tal on March 31, 2013, 10:12:54 PM
Di Canio confirmed.

http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/article/2/8610654/di-canio-named-sunderland-boss

Look out world


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Sheriff Fatman on March 31, 2013, 10:19:24 PM
David Miliband resigns as non-exec Director as a result.

Off to a good start then!


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on March 31, 2013, 10:42:57 PM
David Miliband resigns as non-exec Director as a result.

Off to a good start then!

Sunderland changing there nickname to The Black Shirts apparently


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: tikay on March 31, 2013, 10:46:08 PM
David Miliband resigns as non-exec Director as a result.

Off to a good start then!

Sunderland changing there nickname to The Black Shirts apparently


Oooohhhhh




Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: rfgqqabc on March 31, 2013, 11:00:56 PM
David Miliband resigns as non-exec Director as a result.

Off to a good start then!

Sunderland changing there nickname to The Black Brown Shirts apparently
Fyp?
Had to check, SS black, SA brown. Black shirts much better obviously :)


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Teacake on March 31, 2013, 11:06:55 PM
David Miliband resigns as non-exec Director as a result.

Off to a good start then!

Sunderland changing there nickname to The Black Brown Shirts apparently
Fyp?
Had to check, SS black, SA brown. Black shirts much better obviously :)

Mussolinis Black Shirts.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: kinboshi on March 31, 2013, 11:47:27 PM
David Miliband resigns as non-exec Director as a result.

Off to a good start then!

Sunderland changing there nickname to The Black Shirts apparently

;applause;


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: buzzharvey22 on April 01, 2013, 04:37:08 AM
Paolo Di Caniooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Hopefully he'll give the lazy bastards on the pitch a kick up the arse and get them grafting. Something Martin O'Neil did for a very short space last year when he first took over.

Think PDC might just be able to keep us up, And hopefully he will have some contacts in Europe to buy some low cost decent talent, rather than Manchester Rejects, and overpriced British players. Which the previous 3 managers havnt been able to do.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: ACE2M on April 01, 2013, 07:00:07 AM
disgrace.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Matt.NFFC. on April 01, 2013, 09:06:34 AM
Comedy appointment....

Some of the Swindon players fell out with him, do you really think Premier League players on 50k plus are gonna put up with his style?

They will be like STFU Paolo you XXXX

Interesting to see what level of respect he can command first.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Amatay on April 01, 2013, 09:26:31 AM
lol @ the plums who said MON done nothing. Had a very gd record wherever he went prior to Sunderland


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: MANTIS01 on April 01, 2013, 09:34:34 AM
Love Di Canio and think this will be high octane entertainment but just a pure crazy punt by Ellis Short.

Labour's Milliband showing us politics has a place in sport by flouncing off. Flouncing off from his MP job as well. Sure would've been a great PM dealing with some of the crackpot world leaders out there.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: smashedagain on April 01, 2013, 09:35:31 AM
David Miliband resigns as non-exec Director as a result.

Off to a good start then!

Sunderland changing there nickname to The Black Shirts apparently

;applause;
what exactly did Paulo say to give Milliband the hump


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Doobs on April 01, 2013, 09:40:27 AM
David Miliband resigns as non-exec Director as a result.

Off to a good start then!

Sunderland changing there nickname to The Black Shirts apparently

;applause;
what exactly did Paulo say to give Milliband the hump

There is some quote where he said he was a fascist from a few years ago and there is the nazi salute thing.  Surely Milliband is doing the right thing here?  It is very different meeting fascists than having them in your cabinet?


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: MANTIS01 on April 01, 2013, 10:08:39 AM
Sunderland need unity and a strong team ethic to survive relegation. Wonder how a director walking out in protest achieves that goal? If he is doing the right thing players who disagree with Di Canio's political comment should refuse to play for him. Perhaps all the players should air their political views in a big debate on the training ground to sort this out. What Sunderland need right now is a team who agree on social and economic issues.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: Doobs on April 01, 2013, 10:18:33 AM
Sunderland need unity and a strong team ethic to survive relegation. Wonder how a director walking out in protest achieves that goal? If he is doing the right thing players who disagree with Di Canio's political comment should refuse to play for him. Perhaps all the players should air their political views in a big debate on the training ground to sort this out. What Sunderland need right now is a team who agree on social and economic issues.

Well the obvious solution is don't employ him LDO


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: horseplayer on April 01, 2013, 10:25:17 AM
i have a feeling he will surprise a few

whatever your view on his political leanings i am 99.99% sure footballers could not give a flying one which way he leans politically

there were plenty of people saying he would fail at Swindon (ok he had a nice budget but still did a very good job)

i dont believe he is stupid enough to belittle premiership players in public



Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: horseplayer on April 01, 2013, 10:50:27 AM
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/paolo-di-canio-my-life-speaks-for-me-6273526.html


 a brilliant article which delves beneath the mock outrage of todays headlines and explains a lot more about the man



Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: smashedagain on April 01, 2013, 11:17:41 AM
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/paolo-di-canio-my-life-speaks-for-me-6273526.html


 a brilliant article which delves beneath the mock outrage of todays headlines and explains a lot more about the man


a very good read.


Title: Re: Martin O Neil
Post by: mulhuzz on April 01, 2013, 04:12:02 PM
Its either genius or stupidity and statistically there are more idiots than geniuses I fear.