Awesome work Dan! Congrats!

I'd peel slightly tighter than normal here. You are going to be forced to call down way tighter than normal and that's not fully compensated for by the fact that we win more chips than normal when we make a good hand.

Think it's absolutely fine to just flat AQ also.

Brutal spot mate!

Fold pre for sure, but now we're in a tough spot. Think I probably just call turn and call all in on all non heart rivers.

Think lead real bad at this stack depth and pretty hard to balance.

Call river.

Played it fine bro.

Congrats!!!

Thanks Pleno. Glad you like it.

What you mean 'politically correct' Dubai?

I would definitely fold here. Obviously it's chip EV to shove but it can't be a winning play ICM wise I don't think.

More of a gangsta image you have here the better raise fold is. Sure Moorman could raise and get it thru way more than a random. DownByDaBridge defo gonna fuck with you a lot tho.

ICM wise, if we give the following, pretty wide calling ranges :

co : 99+,AQ+
btn : 66+,A9s+,ATo+,KQs
sb : 88+,AJs+,AQo+
bb : 88+,AJ+

We then calculate Hero's range with 0.05 min ev Diff % (or comes to 29.40 in $ev) we get the following jamming range :

(10.1%) 88+,A9s+,AJo+,KTs+,KQo,QTs+,JTs

When we are jamming that range the correct calling ranges should be :

co : (1.4%) QQ+
btn : (4.7%) TT+,AQ+
sb :  (3.3%) JJ+,AQs+,AKo
bb : (3.3%) JJ+,AQs+,AKo

This is based on payouts for Hot 55 so I'm assuming it's similar. I'm failing to see the argument for ever not jamming here yet Pads is saying a lot of people think so, link to thread Pads ? Interested in reasons giving.

Interesting that a few people basically suggested not having a r/f range here but at the same time think anyone who's decent should stick it in hero's eye if we min raise in this spot ?

Confirmed would be fun if DownByDaBridge was jamming 54% so we could make a breakeven r/c 

Overall, I like this jamming range : (17.3%) 55+,A2s+,ATo+,K9s+,KJo+,Q9s+,JTs

Thanks for the post. Really appreciate someone taking the time to do some maths work and then sharing it.

I think i'm right in saying that in terms of ICM it's not simply a question of us having a correct shoving range, because (as opposed to when calculating cEV) if our opponents deviate from what is optimal we also lose money not just our opponents. So if we KNEW our opponents were calling wider than they should then we would have to adjust our range.

It's for that reason that this isn't a jam.

being absurd enough to be able to r/c  would be good

Obv horrif. You trying to win tournaments, most poker players trying to make money.

I would definitely fold here. Obviously it's chip EV to shove but it can't be a winning play ICM wise I don't think.

More of a gangsta image you have here the better raise fold is. Sure Moorman could raise and get it thru way more than a random. DownByDaBridge defo gonna fuck with you a lot tho.

Do people think there's a difference between selling on a forum, in a section dedicated to selling action, and selling on Facebook?

Could be mistaken about the etiquette of each, but i tend to feel that on a forum you open yourself up to scrutiny from entire marketplace. Buyers and sellers have a right (an obligation?) to address offers with an unjustified mark up.

If your selling on Facebook youre supposedly selling to friends. Now friends might by your action at inflated MU for any number of reasons. Being subjected to interrogation by a lot of pros who have an understanding of true ROI's might be unreasonable.

Don't know what people think. But i defo don't post negative comments on peoples Facebook walls when they sell. I might do on the forum.

Siiiick! Congrats!

Great thread. Thank you.

Surely you have a bet/fold flop range, call flop and turn range and call all 3 range. Seems like this is a hand we call unless until the river with. You have no two pairs so this is way towards top of our range. Romeopro too good/reggy to be making exploitative folds against. Really weird you would make this fold particularly as he dont c/raise top set in this spot i dont think.

Is it necessarily bad for recreational customer? I agree you should be able to opt-out/in but pros and recs alike need to be able to track how theyre doing.

A losing player deserves to be able to see how much money he's done playing online.