Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
|
2
|
Poker Forums / The Rail / Re: cash games in Manchester
|
on: July 19, 2017, 12:21:30 AM
|
Texas every night in 235 about 7.30 ROE or PLO bout 10ish.
Theres Winnamax festival in the G from Thursday so dunno what cash games there will be. Usually theres 1/1 texas every night. I only play the DC there on Tuesday ( in it as I type).
|
|
|
4
|
Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: Television match officials and football
|
on: January 24, 2017, 08:37:17 PM
|
Bubble, are you sure this is what happens in Rugby.
In RL vid replays are only used for two (I think) issues.
Confirmation of a try. (back to previous tackle only)
40/20 Kicks.
Never for fouls/offsides/red cards/ forward passes ior anything else!
Even with this limited use play is often stopped for 2, 3 4 minutes at a time!
Do you watch the Rugby?
|
|
|
6
|
Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: Television match officials and football
|
on: January 24, 2017, 12:56:20 PM
|
Look at 3. 'for offences that should have lead to a red card'
Whi decides. The majority if red card decisions are a matter if opinion. Are they saying that if the on field ref gives a yellow card but the vid refs 'think' it should be red then they tell ref to send him off? I mean whos opinion is the more valuable or valid?
its simply moving one mans opinion to another's imo
|
|
|
7
|
Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: Television match officials and football
|
on: January 24, 2017, 12:51:45 PM
|
In the Bundesliga, they are going to have 4 video refs. With a technician showing them replays 'within a few seconds' Really (have they seena Rugby match with replays!!
Also reason 2 for example 'where the referee unjusifiably awards a penalt ir nit'
Where the ref awards a penalty- who the hell decides if its 'unjustified'. If course there will ve idd times when the ref us blatantly wrong but the vast majority of times its a matter of opinion.
What about when the ref does not award a penalty. Same thing - who decides that there should have been one? When do they stop the play? Do they review the footage if the incident? If they do and the on field ref says no penalty bit the vid ref says penalty - who has the say?
What if they are looking at that incident (say from a corner) they spot another incident which they had not seen before - do they look at that incident? Does that take preference over the other incident?
So many questions , scenarios and details.
The Bundesliga protocol is so woolly ( compared to RL or Union protocols)
|
|
|
8
|
Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: Television match officials and football
|
on: January 24, 2017, 10:04:09 AM
|
So IFAB are going to have a 2 year trial period before deciding whether to go ahead? Can't be that simple can it?
Also it is the referee who decides to use replays, so no 'video ref' which is what most people propose. No 'challenge flag' which people on here say is easily done!
Its so easy to do - yet so many different views and no firm protocol from anyone
|
|
|
15
|
Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: The Grand National Overround Debate
|
on: April 16, 2015, 03:55:24 PM
|
Don't worry about this too much. The SP system doesn't work as well as it once did because the on-course markets are now so weak.
(I have seen Ladbrokes shorten dogs from 5/2 to 6/4 with literally £60 at BAGS meetings) And nowadays I believe they are hedging into the Horse markets by asking for £x at SP!!! (think about it)
But really this is not our concern (by our I mean anyone who has a clue) We don't bet at SP.
In general as punters we have never had it so good in terms of choice and value so don't worry about someones granny having £2 on the National
|
|
|
|
|
| |