I was reading a recent article by Simon (ACES) Trumper, on the UK Betting site (
http://www.ukbettingpoker.co.uk/Lessons/0,12862,298200,00.html ), in which he suggested that the top players should play together so that the public can see their favourite stars regularly and all the finals will comprise great lineups.
I think that this could turn out to be one of the first attempts by proffesional players to form a sort of elitist Professional Poker Players Association.
I think the idea of the tournaments would be a great idea, but not if it means excluding the ordinary punter. I think that to do this would be a bad thing for poker in general.
The way I see it is that a lot of sponsorship will be / and is being attracted to the game.
Its popularity is growing because of the influx of online players, anybody with the talent, some luck and a even only a small bankroll can compete with the best players in the top events.
Poker is the only game in the world where a rank amateur can play with and if he makes the right decisions beat the Pro's.
If it wasn't for the growth of the internet poker sites:
Would the game be as big as it currently is?Would the live tournaments be attracting the increasing number of entrants?Would the sponsers be putting up the money if the game was not being watched and played by the ordinary player.In the past professional poker players have been more than happy to take the fish's money. so don,t let the profesionals close ranks and stop the amateur player from having their chance at the top.
Strange to see, that in a lot of big money tournaments a lot of the finalist's got their by qualifying in sattelites from the net.
How many players will have won a seat to the WSOP by qualifying on line?I think that in a couple of years the old style professional player will not be able to compete against the internet players unless they adapt to the poker net.
What do you think?Cheers