blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 19, 2025, 06:59:55 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262307 Posts in 66604 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  I was wondering
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Poll
Question: Recreational or proffesional, what category do you fall into?  (Voting closed: November 10, 2006, 12:05:15 PM)
Tight and not winning player - 3 (7.3%)
Tight and winning player - 23 (56.1%)
loose and not winning player - 7 (17.1%)
loose and winning player - 8 (19.5%)
Total Voters: 41

Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: I was wondering  (Read 1960 times)
ACE2M
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7832



View Profile
« on: September 21, 2006, 01:05:16 PM »

The options are a bit slim but i would like to see the results
Logged
matt674
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10250



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2006, 01:09:57 PM »

All depends on who i'm being compared with...............
Logged

sponsored by Fyffes
Gryff
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 459


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2006, 01:10:24 PM »

My VPIP is around 25% and I'm a winning player.
Semi-loose/tight aggressive Smiley
Logged
Snatiramas
Loving London
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2941



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2006, 01:11:41 PM »

All depends on who i'm being compared with...............

Matt  three diamonds .............let me think about this
Logged

The most insidious of rules are those that aren't rules at all.
They are the limitations that we invent for ourselves
matt674
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10250



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2006, 01:13:05 PM »

Sit me next to Jac Arama and i'm the rock of all rocks, Sit me next to Alex Kong and i'm looser than Jac Arama.............
Logged

sponsored by Fyffes
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2006, 01:13:41 PM »

the results of these are usually skewed by people, even anonymously, refusing to click the "I'm not winning" options


I seem to remember one poll in which 85% of those blondes answering had won over the last year!
  
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Claw75
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28410



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2006, 01:15:48 PM »

the results of these are usually skewed by people, even anonymously, refusing to click the "I'm not winning" options


I seem to remember one poll in which 85% of those blondes answering had won over the last year!
  

I wonder why?  it's not as if we can see who voted for which option.  I'm quite happy to openly admit that I'm not winning!  (unless the enjoyment I get out of playing counts as winning!)
Logged

"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2006, 01:25:16 PM »

Winning looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooose.

I think the number of blondes who are winners is likely to be higher than the average given they are already on a poker forum.
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
Jon MW
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6202



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2006, 01:35:41 PM »

...

I think the number of blondes who are winners is likely to be higher than the average given they are already on a poker forum.

This is true and also there is a huge variation between one person being winning and another.

At the top end of the scale there is 'making a living out of poker' winning, and at the other end (my end) there's 'making 70 cents an hour' winning - but it's still winning.
Logged

Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield

2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain  - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
Swordpoker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 907



View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: September 22, 2006, 02:49:50 AM »

Everyone's a winning player at least some of the time  Cheesy
Logged

ericstoner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1270


Winner of the Stars $200 sunday biggy, RU APAT Ire


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: September 22, 2006, 03:54:56 PM »

This is impossible to eveluate,cos losers lie and winners say their "about level mate",
the best way to get a true reflection on your pole,is to invert the results.......as a poker player I never lie. Cool
Logged

Blonde Hall of fame inductee,October 2007.
gmoneyAK
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 361


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: September 22, 2006, 03:58:05 PM »

im down
Logged
Jim-D
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4139



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: September 22, 2006, 04:17:00 PM »

Im quite proud of the fact that when i opened my 1st poker account in Feb 2005 and deposited my $200 that i have never had to dip into my bank account to re deposit, I won a seat via a free roll to the Prima $100.000 Gtd and finished 7th for $3100 real early on, I took $2k out to piss against the wall and used the rest to play on many other sites,

Due to my personal finances i have many times had to cash out some nice tournament winnings to pay bills (without poker id probably of really struggled this year), If i never had to do these things then i would have quite a tasty bank roll, but my current roll is about $1500 dotted around various sites so im still stuck at the lower limits.
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.096 seconds with 22 queries.