Pot Limit

[ifm]

Correction crypto has this not tribecca.
If i have 500 in the BB and the blinds are 400-800 then everyone else only needs to call 500, it's daft.

[Rod Paradise]

their justification is 'its always been like that', i tell them everytime i go but they won't listen.

Napoloens Hull being the casino in question!

Ah, Hull, the land that time forgot, that explains it

[UpTheMariners]

their justification is 'its always been like that', i tell them everytime i go but they won't listen.

Napoloens Hull being the casino in question!

Ah, Hull, the land that time forgot, that explains it

yeah no limit games will be introduced in 2056. although to be fair playing only pot limit games live has helped me in the FGR festival  who won event 3?

[Royal Flush]

(i.e with blinds of 200/400 and you go all-in first to act for 700 then a subsequent full pot bet will be 2000 total).


Sheriff

Don't you mean 2700? Call the 700 and raise 2000.

[Sheriff Fatman]

Yes, that's exactly what I meant 

[tikay]

I think you've all missed the point of his question - he's saying that the casino doesn't allow him to go all-in in this situation as he's effectively making an under-raise - which is complete and utter garbage.  What justification do they give for this nosensical rule?  How do they justify the fact that the 300 chips you are made to keep back will be an under-bet at whatever stage they go in?

You should be allowed to push here.  Your chips are then part of the total pot which determines how much the next players can raise (i.e with blinds of 200/400 and you go all-in first to act for 700 then a subsequent full pot bet will be 2000 total).

Which casino is this?

Sheriff

Sounds like Napoleons Sheffield to me. Bizarre!