Stupid call or correct call?

[moritzey]

PokerStars Game #7847535181: Tournament #40109564, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2007/01/09 - 13:30:27 (ET)
Table '40109564 1' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: modawg3434 (3595 in chips)
Seat 4: moritzey (2740 in chips)
Seat 7: Clinkz13 (1095 in chips)
Seat 8: Kenta (1780 in chips)
Seat 9: filicudi (610 in chips)
modawg3434: posts small blind 100
moritzey: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to moritzey [ ]
Clinkz13: raises 895 to 1095 and is all-in
Kenta: folds
filicudi: calls 610 and is all-in
modawg3434: folds
moritzey: calls 895
*** FLOP *** [ ]
*** TURN *** [ ] []
*** RIVER *** [ ] []
*** SHOW DOWN ***
moritzey: shows [ ] (a straight, Six to Ten)
Clinkz13: shows [ ] (a pair of Kings)
Clinkz13 said, "76?"
moritzey collected 970 from side pot
filicudi: shows [ ] (high card Ace)
moritzey collected 1930 from main pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 2900 Main pot 1930. Side pot 970. | Rake 0
Board [ ]
Seat 1: modawg3434 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: moritzey (big blind) showed [ ] and won (2900) with a straight, Six to Ten
Seat 7: Clinkz13 showed [ ] and lost with a pair of Kings
Seat 8: Kenta folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: filicudi (button) showed [ ] and lost with high card Ace

4 get paid, 11 left

[Royal Flush]

It's far too many chips to call this IMO. Still NH

[temp0r]

if it was a winner takes all tournament it's the correct call. but you have enough chips to fold this.

[Royal Flush]

if it was a winner takes all tournament it's the correct call. but you have enough chips to fold this.

900 to win 2k?

I don't see how it is ever a correct call vs 2 players.

[Rookie (Rodney)]

What? This is an eassssssy pass

[temp0r]

if it was a winner takes all tournament it's the correct call. but you have enough chips to fold this.

900 to win 2k?

I don't see how it is ever a correct call vs 2 players.

in a winner takes all tournament with 14 left i think it's a good value call. your cards are live here about 80% of the time as they're both very short stacked. 3 BB and 6 BB. so i would call it. you need chips in that type of tournament after all.

but it's not a winner takes all tournament so it doesn't matter!
oh wel..l we nearly agreed on something for once..

[Royal Flush]

What range of hands do you put them on? I can't see this ever being a call.

[temp0r]

QJ upward?

[boldie]

I'm with flushy. This is never a call for me. Hell guys, even Flushy would fold this... that's a clue in itsself.

I can't see any justification for calling 2 all-ins for 1/3 of your stack with 6/7off here.

[moritzey]

Heh, don't get me wrong - I agree with you that is was a stupid call, don't really know why I made it to be honest. Was pretty much on tilt due to something that had happened on another table at that time, but I know that that's not much of an excuse. The reason why I asked, though:

After I made the call, there was quite a lot of discussion on the table about it, and two of the other players claimed it was a justified call, considering that both of the othe players were rather desperate for chips, therefore pushing with any two broadway, probably even overlapping to some extent giving me 6 outs and reducing their chance to improve. Didn't make too much sense to me, was just wondering if anyone here would come up with something similar.

*off to go install poker stove*

[boldie]

trusdt me my friend..if even flushy says it's a fold..you can stick your mortgage on the fact that it's a feckin fold.