blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 28, 2025, 02:05:51 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262527 Posts in 66609 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  evolution
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 [7] Go Down Print
Author Topic: evolution  (Read 12081 times)
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15483



View Profile WWW
« Reply #90 on: June 25, 2007, 03:49:01 PM »

Where did you get 1043 from, would be interested to read up on it?

As ever, Wikipedia is your friend - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Big_Bang

The standard model of what we know about fundamental particles and forces holds good back untill 10-43 seconds (the Planck epoch) but before that we're guessing. Before then, gravity should be equal to the other forces (giving one force) but we don't know how that happens yet.
Logged
fearisthekey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 844


PL: 51S1NT 4R51MS


View Profile
« Reply #91 on: June 25, 2007, 03:51:50 PM »

Where did you get 1043 from, would be interested to read up on it?

From what i can find after looking on net now, 1 second after is the closest anybody has come to being able to map the universe.



It kind of is 10^-43 and it isn't. There was no time, then there was the BigBang. Afterwards there was spacetime, but spacetime did not come into being immediately after the BigBang went off. To talk of time existing in such a quantum state is meaningless.
Logged

W85N 494 T85 4R51M 253OM5 1 N978TM1R5

4ON0TW1K589MUP

CHEYNE STOKING

fearisthekey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 844


PL: 51S1NT 4R51MS


View Profile
« Reply #92 on: June 25, 2007, 03:54:38 PM »

Some tough reading in those wiki articles, I tell you.

Must have been very hard to create our universe, that Jesus was one clever guy.
Logged

W85N 494 T85 4R51M 253OM5 1 N978TM1R5

4ON0TW1K589MUP

CHEYNE STOKING

AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #93 on: June 25, 2007, 03:56:30 PM »

not that clever. he got himself nicked didnt he.
Logged
KingPoker
Complete and utter luckbox
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4658


CHAMPION OF EUROPE!!!!!!!


View Profile
« Reply #94 on: June 25, 2007, 03:57:03 PM »

Where did you get 1043 from, would be interested to read up on it?

From what i can find after looking on net now, 1 second after is the closest anybody has come to being able to map the universe.



It kind of is 10^-43 and it isn't. There was no time, then there was the BigBang. Afterwards there was spacetime, but spacetime did not come into being immediately after the BigBang went off. To talk of time existing in such a quantum state is meaningless.

If you wanna watch it, and you manage not to fall alseep or go insane while doing so this might interest you:-

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=4183875433858020781&q=bbc+horizon
Logged

CYMRU AM BYTH!    Join my fan club on facebook thumbs up 
Voted Best Arse of Blonde bash 6!
FlyingPig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 438



View Profile
« Reply #95 on: June 25, 2007, 06:20:31 PM »

Cosmology smozmology ---- They cannot tell us much about sapce, and yet you believe them when they say they have narrowed it down to the precise time that the universe was born.....

You will all be believing in Father Xmas next......
Logged
fearisthekey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 844


PL: 51S1NT 4R51MS


View Profile
« Reply #96 on: June 25, 2007, 06:35:41 PM »

Cosmology smozmology ---- They cannot tell us much about sapce, and yet you believe them when they say they have narrowed it down to the precise time that the universe was born.....

You will all be believing in Father Xmas next......

A very large number of people around the world believe Father Xmas to exist.
He has been part of modern culture for a very long time.
He is the source of much good.
You cannot prove that he does not exist. You think all these presents delivered themselves?

Sounds familiar, huh?

The amount discovered by cosmologists in the last 100 years is staggering. New planets outside the solar system. Dark matter (ok we're still pinning it down). The life cycle of all types of star. Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation. Discovery and creation of fundamental particles. The list goes on and on.
Logged

W85N 494 T85 4R51M 253OM5 1 N978TM1R5

4ON0TW1K589MUP

CHEYNE STOKING

FlyingPig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 438



View Profile
« Reply #97 on: June 25, 2007, 07:01:19 PM »

The post was in jest, I know they have done a lot of work but it is based on unfound and un proven theory and assumptions, as my nan would say ' If ifs and buts were pots and pans (i think the rest was) there would be no need for tinkers like you'....

Cosmologists  base there assumptions on things like expading at a universal rate.. This may be so.... They have assumed this, and therefore this may be wrong...

They assume the universe is still expanding at a massive rate, well why are we not moving further apart from the things close to us at the same proportional rate....

David Copperfield seemed to make the statue of liberty dissapear but he never,,, he made it look like that....

Edit --- All things will evolve or adapt as much as we want or as much as we let them. Just like this thread...
« Last Edit: June 25, 2007, 07:22:24 PM by FlyingPig » Logged
KingPoker
Complete and utter luckbox
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4658


CHAMPION OF EUROPE!!!!!!!


View Profile
« Reply #98 on: June 25, 2007, 07:03:34 PM »

The post was in jest, I know they have done a lot of work but it is based on unfound and un proven theory and assumptions, as my nan would say ' If ifs and buts were pots and pans (i think the rest was) there would be no need for tinkers like you'....

Cosmologists  base there assumptions on things like expading at a universal rate.. This may be so.... They have assumed this, and therefore this m ay be wrong...

They assume the universe is still expanding at a massive rate, well why are we not moving further apart from the things close to us at the same proportional rate....

David Copperfield seemed to make the statue of liberty dissapear but he never,,, he made it look like that....

Thank god the bible isnt like that hey! Pure Fact i tell you!
Logged

CYMRU AM BYTH!    Join my fan club on facebook thumbs up 
Voted Best Arse of Blonde bash 6!
fearisthekey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 844


PL: 51S1NT 4R51MS


View Profile
« Reply #99 on: June 25, 2007, 07:10:57 PM »

The post was in jest, I know they have done a lot of work but it is based on unfound and un proven theory and assumptions, as my nan would say ' If ifs and buts were pots and pans (i think the rest was) there would be no need for tinkers like you'....

Cosmologists  base there assumptions on things like expading at a universal rate.. This may be so.... They have assumed this, and therefore this m ay be wrong...

They assume the universe is still expanding at a massive rate, well why are we not moving further apart from the things close to us at the same proportional rate....

David Copperfield seemed to make the statue of liberty dissapear but he never,,, he made it look like that....
thumbs up

if you sit perfectly still and look at your computer monitor, you will notice that in the space of 2 minutes it does start receding from you slightly.

« Last Edit: June 25, 2007, 07:48:16 PM by fearisthekey » Logged

W85N 494 T85 4R51M 253OM5 1 N978TM1R5

4ON0TW1K589MUP

CHEYNE STOKING

AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #100 on: June 26, 2007, 07:39:37 PM »

http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=24979.new#new
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 [7] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.111 seconds with 20 queries.