standard or spew?

[AlexMartin]

I appreciate preflop is unorthodox (tez?) but ep opener was kinda nitty and i figured had a tight range.

Bad gamble?


***** Betfair Poker Hand History for Game 504683695 *****
PL $1/$2 Omaha - Saturday, April 04, 02:21:46 GMT 2009
Table Shenandoah 06 6-max (Real Money)
Seat 4 is the button
Total number of active players : 6
Seat 1: sam168 ( $343.65 )
Seat 2: folly6 ( $211.11 )
Seat 3: donemilio ( $190 )
Seat 4: Dartgott ( $596.09 )
Seat 5: Incogito ( $645.15 )
Seat 6: JammyJenny ( $200 )
Incogito posts small blind [$1]
JammyJenny posts big blind [$2]
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to JammyJenny [ , , , ]
sam168 calls [$2]
folly6 raises to [$9]
donemilio folds
Dartgott folds
Incogito folds
JammyJenny calls [$7]
sam168 calls [$7]
** Dealing Flop ** [ , , ]
JammyJenny checks
sam168 bets [$28]
folly6 calls [$28]
JammyJenny raises to [$140]

[NoflopsHomer]

All looks fine to me, it's just a case of who leads with the sets vs who c/r them. Peeling here is fine too because your hand is super disguised when you hit.

Edit - given the BB leads into the raiser, I'm moving towards the flatting camp in case the turn pairs.

[boldie]

yeah, I am fine with this really.

[GlasgowBandit]

All looks fine to me, it's just a case of who leads with the sets vs who c/r them. Peeling here is fine too because your hand is super disguised when you hit.

Edit - given the BB leads into the raiser, I'm moving towards the flatting camp in case the turn pairs.

I like this, keeps it simple.   I also like getting involved in pots with these type of hands.  When you hit its often disguised and you get paid often enough to make it +evs to speculate with this sort of holding. 

Especially as you have identified the villain in the hand as a nit, you can narrow his range somewhat