I said there wasnt much difference between 55 and atc in terms of in the shitiness which there isnt. (I acknowledge my mistake above b4 you posted). You seem to want to cling to the delusion that there is some value in 55 vs his tight calling range and refuse to accept that the entire value in pushing is fold equity.
I did actually take the time to put this hand thru sitngo wiz. On its defaults, even the loosest, pushing is a big mistake. So why would this be?
Ty for acknowledging this mistake, i missed it b4, but can see u did.
I did not say that we are not mainly pushing 55 for fe, just that it isn't the only factor, thus it's not an atc push as stove shows we are in much better shape with 55 than atc v any of his range.
You say theire isn't much difference, but i'd call 7, and 11 percent differences quite a lot tbh.
And the 'shitness' which we are in if he calls are 47 and 39% against the ranges i assigned, certainly not huge dogs and even if we lose this hand we are still alive and in with a chance of taking this down.
Not a huge fan of sng whizz and for a start this is a little diff imo as it's a 45 manner and thus the prizes are more jumpy.
Lets not get into a huge debate about this tbh, u go with yr style and i'll go with mine, once the word 'shitness' is mentioned i'd say it's time to call an end to the convo!
Author