blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 21, 2025, 09:44:47 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262358 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  DTD Ruling??
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: DTD Ruling??  (Read 2945 times)
Karabiner
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 22812


James Webb Telescope


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 04, 2012, 07:55:45 PM »

and Id rather have kept my 500 stack tbh Smiley

GIQ ffs Wink
Logged

"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated. It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time maddening and rewarding and it is without a doubt the greatest game that mankind has ever invented." - Arnold Palmer aka The King.
redsimon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8631



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 04, 2012, 08:29:42 PM »

and Id rather have kept my 500 stack tbh Smiley

GIQ ffs Wink

so rare gotta shout about it Smiley
Logged

Success has many parents but failure is an orphan

http://www.organdonation.nhs.uk
ChristieEllis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 130



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 04, 2012, 11:55:42 PM »

I guess it's pretty annoying for you at this moment in time but going forward if you want a rough idea of how much a player is playing when he/she sits down just ask the player or dealer it's never a problem then if any doubts then it can be sorted as soon as possible .

What do you think the correct ruling should have been and what do you think would have made the situation better?
Logged

Regards,
Christie
Derbylad
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 320



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 05, 2012, 12:02:13 AM »

99% of the time i'm the one that pisses you off by telling you its 200 maximum its just the rare occurrence i hadn't noticed.
I don't mind losing the hand, it plays itself but i shouldn't have been stacked off.

IMO... The player should have only had the table maximum of 200 so should only legitimately be able to win 200 of an opponents stack as he hadn't gained a greater stack through play at the table. I don't see how as a player you could justify against that as your still winning £200.

Really disappointing on DTD's behalf.
Logged
jgcblack
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3433


C'est la vie


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 05, 2012, 12:42:23 AM »

Quote
As far as I'm aware if a player moves from a50/1 table to another he is allowed to bring all of his chips over. I'm surprised they sat there for 4 hands and nobody asked how much they were playing. Also I would of asked for a total amount of the all in bet rather than assume it's a certain amount. An unfortunate incident IMO.

The ruling at DTD as far as i'm aware....
is that a player is able to bring a full stack size over, i.e. one that is over the table maximum of 200 if the table is legitimately broken by the house e.g. if it goes down to 2 handed etc...
The table in question wasn't legitimately broken so i was under the assumption the player would only be playing 200 hence the assumption on stack size

Does this mean that at DTD, if I've run my £200 up to £1000, but fancy taking my profits but continue to play, I can just ask for a table change, stick £800 in my pocket and carry on playing?

That can't be right.

And yet it is.

Yeah I ran 200 up to 500 (thin brag yeah) a few weeks ago and moved to what I thought was better table after some good regs joined mine. Was a bit flummoxed when dealer said I had to weed 300 off into my pocket!

Yeah its a pretty sick rule when you consider no other card room allows this.  I understand why DTD do it, but I've also told Danny and Tom (cash managers) that if I feel the need or the games are good, I will do this regularly.  I was told this would be frowned upon by someone of my reg/ rules understanding status.  This winds me up as any rule can be 'used' if you can find the angle and tbh the skill of spotting advantages in all aspects of life and in poker its +ev decisions or ways to 'lock up' profits given the chance is one I shouldn't be penalised for.

Best ask Alex as he's the only reg I know to leave the £1/2 and lock up profits to sit on the 50/£1 with £65 for 'fun'.....
Logged

zerofive
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1884


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 05, 2012, 01:03:48 AM »

Name and shame the reg Gary?

100% wasn't Ben Mortlock
Logged
jakally
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2003



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 05, 2012, 02:35:31 AM »


Best ask Alex as he's the only reg I know to leave the £1/2 and lock up profits to sit on the 50/£1 with £65 for 'fun'.....

Bit unfair....pretty sure this was before he was a winning player.
..........December IIRC.
Logged
ScottMGee
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 481



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 05, 2012, 07:54:16 AM »

Not sure why everyone is hating the max buy in on table change rule.

I understand the non-weeding rule was to allow the other players a chance to win their money back. However, if you move tables they loose this chance anyone hence the max buy in rules makes no difference to them unless they follow you round the room.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.223 seconds with 20 queries.