1st hand at a new table in the $109 Second Chance today at 6pm.
Villain is a presumed random until he min-raises us, upon which I sharkscoped him and discovered he's down $150k over 4500 games, albeit with an average ROI of only -7.5%.
I hated my life when he min raised. If he makes any other raise or whatever I mean I'm obviously getting it in and am rather pleased about it. But wtf min raises here?
It just seems unlikely this is a bluff, he can't really have QQ+, a flush draw is unlikely to min raise, and we block AJ. I guess he could have a sick combo draw with Jxdd, or QTdd. Otherwise that leaves sets, which we obviously don't like.
But when you sharkscope the guy and he's a huge loser does this make the decision for us where we have to presume he can sometimes have something ridiculous here?
PokerStars Hand #104486750647: Tournament #2013092043, $100+$9 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level IX (150/300) - 2013/09/22 19:35:13 WET [2013/09/22 14:35:13 ET]
Table '2013092043 302' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: Trappa 105 (12770 in chips)
Seat 2: DoePopoe (12278 in chips)
Seat 3: saks80 (17600 in chips)
Seat 4: L. Veldhuis (3093 in chips)
Seat 5: AltyAA (5709 in chips)
Seat 6: Don Marato (13489 in chips)
Seat 7: wiper222 (13682 in chips)
Seat 8: Odggin (18257 in chips)
Seat 9: epitomised (19980 in chips)
Trappa 105: posts the ante 40
DoePopoe: posts the ante 40
saks80: posts the ante 40
L. Veldhuis: posts the ante 40
AltyAA: posts the ante 40
Don Marato: posts the ante 40
wiper222: posts the ante 40
Odggin: posts the ante 40
epitomised: posts the ante 40
L. Veldhuis: posts small blind 150
AltyAA: posts big blind 300
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to epitomised [

Ah]
Don Marato: raises 300 to 600
wiper222: folds
Odggin: folds
epitomised: raises 715 to 1315
Trappa 105: folds
DoePopoe: folds
saks80: folds
L. Veldhuis: folds
AltyAA: folds
Don Marato: calls 715
*** FLOP *** [

]
Don Marato: checks
epitomised: bets 1450
Don Marato: raises 1450 to 2900
epitomised: