Ruling to settle home game debate.

[baldock92]

Just want to settle a small debate: we're playing a home game, and the play has been limped round to the big blind who removes his blind and replaces it with a single chip of a larger denomination, without voicing its a raise. The argument is does the raise stand, as it's only been a single chip placed into the pot?

[Tal]

Just want to settle a small debate: we're playing a home game, and the play has been limped round to the big blind who removes his blind and replaces it with a single chip of a larger denomination, without voicing its a raise. The argument is does the raise stand, as it's only been a single chip placed into the pot?

Player intended to raise. Let him raise.

[rfgqqabc]

Just want to settle a small debate: we're playing a home game, and the play has been limped round to the big blind who removes his blind and replaces it with a single chip of a larger denomination, without voicing its a raise. The argument is does the raise stand, as it's only been a single chip placed into the pot?

Player intended to raise. Let him raise.

Of course this. Anyone who said otherwise needs to have 3 shots before the start of the next game and lighten the fuck up.

[baldock92]

Cheers guys, yup I didn't really understand the issue but thought I'd clarify

[DropTheHammer]

Yeah just ask him what his intentions were and to say it next time before acting. He could have just wanted to grab some change with a call...

[BorntoBubble]

It's a home game, have another beer and move on

[Rexas]

How much was the chip worth? I'm only asking because if you know, you weren't pissed enough.

[vegaslover]

How much was the chip worth? I'm only asking because if you know, you weren't pissed enough.

Winner

[stato_1]

Even in the rules this is a raise