blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 28, 2025, 12:49:49 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262527 Posts in 66609 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Different STT levels
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Different STT levels  (Read 1448 times)
moritzey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 597


View Profile
« on: April 28, 2006, 03:10:35 AM »

Just been wondering about this for a bit, played a few of the $5.50 extended sit-n-go's on blonde earlier on and played like an absolute fish in the majority of them, busting out early in two and bubbling in the third.
At some point I mentioned to Kev that I was playing in a $11 Sng at the same time, and he made the fair point that I should probably master the $5.50 level first before playing those.
Fair point, except for the fact that I've played them for quite a while now, and have quite a good ROI on them. Basically I'm a winning player on the $11 level but a loosing player on the $5.50 level.

Dunno really what to make of this, it's either that I've been a very lucky fish at the higher level over some 120 STTs or that the standard there really is lower or more suited to my (usually quite tight) style of play. Any ideas why that could be? And more importantly, how can I crack the $5.50 level?
Logged
totalise
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2620


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2006, 03:52:02 AM »

if you are beating the $11 level, I wouldn't worry about cracking the $5's!

what kinda sample are you running off on the $5's? at the extended sng's I guess that people can sit and wait for better hands because of the longer blind structure, so its possible that you are just not adjusting to the improved requisite hand strength, as in your hand would typically need to be stronger to play for stacks in an extended then it would be in a standard.... but your post doesn't really give any info as to where you might be going wrong, so it will be pretty hard to offer any useful advice.

Also if you are just playing in the bingo-fury blonde poker $5 sng tournies, then the skill level is (or at least should be) higher then your average $11 donkfest.. or its going to be real volatile given their tendancy to reduce into e-peen contests. Either of these will increase your variance in the short term

Not sure if this is any use, but given the sparsity of the initial post, its hard to give more pertinent advice.



Logged
The Baron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9558


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2006, 03:56:50 AM »

Certain levels aren't always suited to you. I have a HUGE STT sample and my worst results usually came in the middle buy-in STTs.
Logged
Swordpoker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 907



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2006, 10:45:06 AM »

I've discovered the same thing with SNGs. I do better in $20 &$30 games than I do in $5 &$10 ones. If your style of play suits the $11 games then stick with it and build your bankroll.
Logged

the bus
so comma crew footsoldier
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 162


All aboard! (The bitter bus)


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 28, 2006, 10:56:15 AM »

Even, pretty boy poker Guru, Mason Malmouth reommends staying away from the really small limits sometimes. Playing them for no longer than it takes to get used to the mechanics of the game.

He wiz talking about limit poker. It could be kinda true in STTs too though. At the smaller buy-ins you'll have less skills in your arsenal to bring to bear. A lot of your weapons are obsolete when opponents call all the time. You have to play a completely different style of poker (the waiting game)

That being said, you should be able to beat the $5 extendeds, if you're not, totalise's advice on how you may not have properly adjusted is well worth taking to heart.
Logged
ifm
If you're not part of the solution, you're a solid or a gas. Jimmy Carr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9259



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2006, 12:13:43 PM »

Quite simple answer really,  shark like me and Kev OWN the $5 stt's just ask Robert, tighty and the LIMPET  Cheesy
Logged

Sometimes you have to suffer a little bit in your youth to motivate yourself to succeed in later life.
Do you think if Bill Gates got laid in high school, do you think there'd be a Microsoft?
Of course not.
stallyon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1210



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2006, 01:02:15 PM »

as you move further down the scale you are faced with more and more learners who will call anything and hit impossibilities...you can never bluff these people as it isnt in their vocabulary and they dont even know they hold a full house....
Logged

 
 Click to see full-size image.
Colchester Kev
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 34178



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 28, 2006, 01:40:51 PM »

Quite simple answer really,  shark like me and Kev OWN the $5 stt's just ask Robert, tighty and the LIMPET  Cheesy

Correct Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Thanks also to Moritzey and Heid for last nights donations Wink
Logged

Sleep don't visit, so I choke on sun
And the days blur into one
And the backs of my eyes hum with things I've never done

http://colchesterkev.wordpress.com/


kevshep2010@hotmail.co.uk
moritzey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 597


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2006, 08:30:52 PM »

Thanks for all the useful comments. totalise has a good point with adjusting to the 'extended' bit of the $5 sngs that I've recently been donating to. Will have a look into that at some point and take some money of Kev then Wink
Quite glad to hear though, that I'm not the only one who has problems beating the game at a smaller level rather than my own level.
Totalise: My sample size for the $5.50 is pretty small, perhaps 20 games or so, so I admit, way to early to make long-term predictions, it just didn't feel right at the time.
Well, I'll probably find out tonight if the game is beatable down there with a different strategy (hint: rock)...
Logged
Colchester Kev
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 34178



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2006, 08:35:09 PM »

I love playing against rocks, makes my all in thefts so much easier Smiley
Logged

Sleep don't visit, so I choke on sun
And the days blur into one
And the backs of my eyes hum with things I've never done

http://colchesterkev.wordpress.com/


kevshep2010@hotmail.co.uk
moritzey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 597


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2006, 11:52:56 PM »

Is that so? In that case I think I'll run scared tonight and practise a little at the Oxford cup over the next two days before taking your hard earned cash by calling your all-in thefts on Monday. (Or more likely, calling with second pair and looking silly when you rake the pot ...)
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.121 seconds with 20 queries.