blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 14, 2025, 12:26:33 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262231 Posts in 66603 Topics by 16988 Members
Latest Member: Jengajenga921
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
| | |-+  Poll: Should all Cup Finals be settled over 2 leg matches?		 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Poll
Question: Do you think all Cup Finals should be settled over 2 leg matches instead of a 1 leg match?
Yes
No
Undecided

Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Poll: Should all Cup Finals be settled over 2 leg matches?  (Read 2037 times)
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« on: May 18, 2006, 12:49:56 AM »
You views?
Logged
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2006, 12:55:33 AM »
a final has to be a big single event. I know it's sometimes not a popular thing to say but I think Pens are a perfectly fair way of ending a game too. infact if it were up to me it'd be 90 mins then straight to pens. great spectacle.
Logged
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2006, 03:57:47 AM »
Gotta agree with Adam, apart from the penaltys after 90 minutes.

I love the extra time period, a great test of fitness and endurance.
Logged
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
GlasgowBandit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5646


Global Pacifier


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2006, 07:33:00 AM »
There is no reason for a final to be played over two legs, none whatsoever!
Logged
Visit my blog http://banditsallin.blogspot.com/
bolt pp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10906



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2006, 01:08:36 PM »
no way pedro.

final not finals.
Logged
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2006, 01:09:48 PM »
Remember the UEFA Cup Final was a 2 leg affair. I voted yes.
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10906



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 18, 2006, 01:25:28 PM »
The least credible of all major championship finals!

What good reason is there to make it a 2 leg affair?

i just dont see the point.
Logged
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 18, 2006, 01:26:40 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on May 18, 2006, 01:25:28 PM
The least credible of all major championship finals!

What good reason is there to make it a 2 leg affair?

i just dont see the point.



I feel that over 2 legs, there is a better chance of the best team winning.

Why are the semi finals and q/f 2 leg?
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10906



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 18, 2006, 01:32:01 PM »
erm....to give the better and therfore most deserving team a better chance of progression?

Theres got to come a point though when the best team is'nt always the most desrving and dos'nt always win( i'm not a communist) Cheesy

why not just keep playing the match for about 3 hours if need be till the better team hits the front.

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!! give the underdogs a chance.
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.067 seconds with 23 queries.