blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 20, 2025, 09:26:02 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2261804 Posts in 66596 Topics by 16984 Members
Latest Member: thomas_1
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Another Ruling Thread
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Another Ruling Thread  (Read 2464 times)
Girgy85
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9507



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: October 25, 2009, 11:32:44 AM »


If the button put in 525 there would be no debate about whether it was a raise or not, so why is the sb any different?

If the SB had 3 x 25 chips and simply just threw a 500 chip on top it is only seen as a call (if the button put 575 it is a raise). If the SB took the 75 back and threw a 500 chip in, it is a call.

The arguement is technically, as a blind is a forced bet, all the player has done is to throw in an oversize chip. If he took the 75 back and then threw 525 in it would be a raise, but TECHNICALLY and literally an oversize chip has been thrown in, the rule doesn't say anything about taking a chip out of the pot (as the player really shouldn't be having his hands in the pot in the first
place)

 

he hasn't touched the pot he has simply taken back his own chips put in a raise!
Logged

Best poster Girgy IMO - Mantis

Girgy is my new hero! - Evilpie

Think Girgy has shown the best leopard instincts in this thread and would prob survive best in the wild. Eye of the tiger that fella - Mantis

Girgy is a m'fkn machine - Daveshoelace
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8081



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: October 25, 2009, 11:33:45 AM »


If the button put in 525 there would be no debate about whether it was a raise or not, so why is the sb any different?

If the SB had 3 x 25 chips and simply just threw a 500 chip on top it is only seen as a call (if the button put 575 it is a raise). If the SB took the 75 back and threw a 500 chip in, it is a call.

The arguement is technically, as a blind is a forced bet, all the player has done is to throw in an oversize chip. If he took the 75 back and then threw 525 in it would be a raise, but TECHNICALLY and literally an oversize chip has been thrown in, the rule doesn't say anything about taking a chip out of the pot (as the player really shouldn't be having his hands in the pot in the first place)

 

Agreed. BUT. Those chips have yet to be pulled into the pot so this is fine imo.
Logged

Blue text
dik9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3025



View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: October 25, 2009, 11:35:16 AM »

If he took the 75 back and then threw 525 in it would be a raise,

this is what he has effectively done and it is clearly his intention

how was it ruled at the time?

I ruled a raise, and used the words it is clear intent.

However, if someone has stacks of low value chips, and the blinds are 25/50, if someone throws in a square (to stop the colour blind thing) 1000 chip without saying anything, although it is intent. It is a call.
Logged

Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
dik9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3025



View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: October 25, 2009, 11:37:56 AM »


If the button put in 525 there would be no debate about whether it was a raise or not, so why is the sb any different?

If the SB had 3 x 25 chips and simply just threw a 500 chip on top it is only seen as a call (if the button put 575 it is a raise). If the SB took the 75 back and threw a 500 chip in, it is a call.

The arguement is technically, as a blind is a forced bet, all the player has done is to throw in an oversize chip. If he took the 75 back and then threw 525 in it would be a raise, but TECHNICALLY and literally an oversize chip has been thrown in, the rule doesn't say anything about taking a chip out of the pot (as the player really shouldn't be having his hands in the pot in the first
place)

 

he hasn't touched the pot he has simply taken back his own chips put in a raise!


This shouldn't happen, a player should never get their own change, even if it is from their own chips they have put in. It just seems accepted that the small blind sometimes takes out the whole SB and makes up.
Logged

Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8081



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: October 25, 2009, 11:42:02 AM »


If the button put in 525 there would be no debate about whether it was a raise or not, so why is the sb any different?

If the SB had 3 x 25 chips and simply just threw a 500 chip on top it is only seen as a call (if the button put 575 it is a raise). If the SB took the 75 back and threw a 500 chip in, it is a call.

The arguement is technically, as a blind is a forced bet, all the player has done is to throw in an oversize chip. If he took the 75 back and then threw 525 in it would be a raise, but TECHNICALLY and literally an oversize chip has been thrown in, the rule doesn't say anything about taking a chip out of the pot (as the player really shouldn't be having his hands in the pot in the first
place)

 

he hasn't touched the pot he has simply taken back his own chips put in a raise!


This shouldn't happen, a player should never get their own change, even if it is from their own chips they have put in. It just seems accepted that the small blind sometimes takes out the whole SB and makes up.

This isn't getting change though, it's just correcting your bet.

Eg. Someone bets 800. I call. There's a raise to 2000. Me throwing in 2x1000 at pulling in my 800 is perfectly fine surely? Obv if I only had a 5000 chip then I'd pull my 800 back, throw the 5k in and let you deal with change from there. The rule I follow is I don't mind players touching their own bets as long as they touch no-one elses: the chips in front of a person must be their own and unaffected by anyone else.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2009, 11:45:04 AM by Cf » Logged

Blue text
dik9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3025



View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: October 25, 2009, 11:45:51 AM »

Quote
Eg. Someone bets 800. I call. There's a raise to 2000. Me throwing in 2x1000 at pulling in my 800 is perfectly fine surely?

Technically no, you should say call and throw your 2 x 1000 chips and wait for the dealer to give you the 800, although in reality as said, it is accepted and has become the norm.
Logged

Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
Girgy85
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9507



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: October 25, 2009, 12:30:43 PM »

Quote
Eg. Someone bets 800. I call. There's a raise to 2000. Me throwing in 2x1000 at pulling in my 800 is perfectly fine surely?

Technically no, you should say call and throw your 2 x 1000 chips and wait for the dealer to give you the 800, although in reality as said, it is accepted and has become the norm.

less work for dealer IMO!
Logged

Best poster Girgy IMO - Mantis

Girgy is my new hero! - Evilpie

Think Girgy has shown the best leopard instincts in this thread and would prob survive best in the wild. Eye of the tiger that fella - Mantis

Girgy is a m'fkn machine - Daveshoelace
relaedgc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1189


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: October 26, 2009, 07:57:26 AM »

Depends on the dealer, I'm normally pretty sharp and I'll make sure the pot is correct so the player will be facing 1200 more to call. If you can get the 2k in before I have done that though I don't mind.
Logged

"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster...when you gaze long into the abyss the abyss also gazes into you..."
Friedrich Nietzsche
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8081



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: October 26, 2009, 09:42:05 AM »

Depends on the dealer, I'm normally pretty sharp and I'll make sure the pot is correct so the player will be facing 1200 more to call. If you can get the 2k in before I have done that though I don't mind.

you mean you'll have already pulled the bets in? This is bad practice imo
Logged

Blue text
Girgy85
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9507



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: October 26, 2009, 11:20:09 AM »

Depends on the dealer, I'm normally pretty sharp and I'll make sure the pot is correct so the player will be facing 1200 more to call. If you can get the 2k in before I have done that though I don't mind.

you mean you'll have already pulled the bets in? This is bad practice imo

think he means changed a 1k in the pot and left the bet infront of the player and give him change!
Logged

Best poster Girgy IMO - Mantis

Girgy is my new hero! - Evilpie

Think Girgy has shown the best leopard instincts in this thread and would prob survive best in the wild. Eye of the tiger that fella - Mantis

Girgy is a m'fkn machine - Daveshoelace
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8081



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: October 26, 2009, 01:02:03 PM »

Depends on the dealer, I'm normally pretty sharp and I'll make sure the pot is correct so the player will be facing 1200 more to call. If you can get the 2k in before I have done that though I don't mind.

you mean you'll have already pulled the bets in? This is bad practice imo

think he means changed a 1k in the pot and left the bet infront of the player and give him change!

He says we're facing a situation of 1200 more to call. I get the impression that he's pulled the 800 in already and is now going around saying "1200 to call". This is bad. The chips should be left in front with the announcement of "the bet is 2000".
Logged

Blue text
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.117 seconds with 21 queries.