poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
June 20, 2025, 09:26:02 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2261804
Posts in
66596
Topics by
16984
Members
Latest Member:
thomas_1
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
Another Ruling Thread
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Author
Topic: Another Ruling Thread (Read 2464 times)
Girgy85
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9507
Re: Another Ruling Thread
«
Reply #15 on:
October 25, 2009, 11:32:44 AM »
Quote from: dik9 on October 25, 2009, 11:23:14 AM
Quote from: doubleup on October 25, 2009, 09:29:11 AM
If the button put in 525 there would be no debate about whether it was a raise or not, so why is the sb any different?
If the SB had 3 x 25 chips and simply just threw a 500 chip on top it is only seen as a call (if the button put 575 it is a raise). If the SB took the 75 back and threw a 500 chip in, it is a call.
The arguement is technically, as a blind is a forced bet, all the player has done is to throw in an oversize chip. If he took the 75 back and then threw 525 in it would be a raise, but TECHNICALLY and literally an oversize chip has been thrown in, the rule doesn't say anything about taking a chip out of the pot (
as the player really shouldn't be having his hands in the pot in the first
place)
he hasn't touched the pot he has simply taken back his own chips put in a raise!
Logged
Best poster Girgy IMO - Mantis
Girgy is my new hero! - Evilpie
Think Girgy has shown the best leopard instincts in this thread and would prob survive best in the wild. Eye of the tiger that fella - Mantis
Girgy is a m'fkn machine - Daveshoelace
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: Another Ruling Thread
«
Reply #16 on:
October 25, 2009, 11:33:45 AM »
Quote from: dik9 on October 25, 2009, 11:23:14 AM
Quote from: doubleup on October 25, 2009, 09:29:11 AM
If the button put in 525 there would be no debate about whether it was a raise or not, so why is the sb any different?
If the SB had 3 x 25 chips and simply just threw a 500 chip on top it is only seen as a call (if the button put 575 it is a raise). If the SB took the 75 back and threw a 500 chip in, it is a call.
The arguement is technically, as a blind is a forced bet, all the player has done is to throw in an oversize chip. If he took the 75 back and then threw 525 in it would be a raise, but TECHNICALLY and literally an oversize chip has been thrown in, the rule doesn't say anything about taking a chip out of the pot
(as the player really shouldn't be having his hands in the pot in the first place)
Agreed. BUT. Those chips have yet to be pulled into the pot so this is fine imo.
Logged
Blue text
dik9
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3025
Re: Another Ruling Thread
«
Reply #17 on:
October 25, 2009, 11:35:16 AM »
Quote from: gatso on October 25, 2009, 11:30:04 AM
Quote from: dik9 on October 25, 2009, 11:23:14 AM
If he took the 75 back and then threw 525 in it would be a raise,
this is what he has effectively done and it is clearly his intention
how was it ruled at the time?
I ruled a raise, and used the words it is clear intent.
However, if someone has stacks of low value chips, and the blinds are 25/50, if someone throws in a square (to stop the colour blind thing) 1000 chip without saying anything, although it is intent. It is a call.
Logged
Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
dik9
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3025
Re: Another Ruling Thread
«
Reply #18 on:
October 25, 2009, 11:37:56 AM »
Quote from: Girgy85 on October 25, 2009, 11:32:44 AM
Quote from: dik9 on October 25, 2009, 11:23:14 AM
Quote from: doubleup on October 25, 2009, 09:29:11 AM
If the button put in 525 there would be no debate about whether it was a raise or not, so why is the sb any different?
If the SB had 3 x 25 chips and simply just threw a 500 chip on top it is only seen as a call (if the button put 575 it is a raise). If the SB took the 75 back and threw a 500 chip in, it is a call.
The arguement is technically, as a blind is a forced bet, all the player has done is to throw in an oversize chip. If he took the 75 back and then threw 525 in it would be a raise, but TECHNICALLY and literally an oversize chip has been thrown in, the rule doesn't say anything about taking a chip out of the pot (
as the player really shouldn't be having his hands in the pot in the first
place)
he hasn't touched the pot he has simply taken back his own chips put in a raise!
This shouldn't happen, a player should never get their own change, even if it is from their own chips they have put in. It just seems accepted that the small blind sometimes takes out the whole SB and makes up.
Logged
Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: Another Ruling Thread
«
Reply #19 on:
October 25, 2009, 11:42:02 AM »
Quote from: dik9 on October 25, 2009, 11:37:56 AM
Quote from: Girgy85 on October 25, 2009, 11:32:44 AM
Quote from: dik9 on October 25, 2009, 11:23:14 AM
Quote from: doubleup on October 25, 2009, 09:29:11 AM
If the button put in 525 there would be no debate about whether it was a raise or not, so why is the sb any different?
If the SB had 3 x 25 chips and simply just threw a 500 chip on top it is only seen as a call (if the button put 575 it is a raise). If the SB took the 75 back and threw a 500 chip in, it is a call.
The arguement is technically, as a blind is a forced bet, all the player has done is to throw in an oversize chip. If he took the 75 back and then threw 525 in it would be a raise, but TECHNICALLY and literally an oversize chip has been thrown in, the rule doesn't say anything about taking a chip out of the pot (
as the player really shouldn't be having his hands in the pot in the first
place)
he hasn't touched the pot he has simply taken back his own chips put in a raise!
This shouldn't happen, a player should never get their own change, even if it is from their own chips they have put in. It just seems accepted that the small blind sometimes takes out the whole SB and makes up.
This isn't getting change though, it's just correcting your bet.
Eg. Someone bets 800. I call. There's a raise to 2000. Me throwing in 2x1000 at pulling in my 800 is perfectly fine surely? Obv if I only had a 5000 chip then I'd pull my 800 back, throw the 5k in and let you deal with change from there. The rule I follow is I don't mind players touching their own bets as long as they touch no-one elses: the chips in front of a person must be their own and unaffected by anyone else.
«
Last Edit: October 25, 2009, 11:45:04 AM by Cf
»
Logged
Blue text
dik9
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3025
Re: Another Ruling Thread
«
Reply #20 on:
October 25, 2009, 11:45:51 AM »
Quote
Eg. Someone bets 800. I call. There's a raise to 2000. Me throwing in 2x1000 at pulling in my 800 is perfectly fine surely?
Technically no, you should say call and throw your 2 x 1000 chips and wait for the dealer to give you the 800, although in reality as said, it is accepted and has become the norm.
Logged
Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
Girgy85
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9507
Re: Another Ruling Thread
«
Reply #21 on:
October 25, 2009, 12:30:43 PM »
Quote from: dik9 on October 25, 2009, 11:45:51 AM
Quote
Eg. Someone bets 800. I call. There's a raise to 2000. Me throwing in 2x1000 at pulling in my 800 is perfectly fine surely?
Technically no, you should say call and throw your 2 x 1000 chips and wait for the dealer to give you the 800, although in reality as said, it is accepted and has become the norm.
less work for dealer IMO!
Logged
Best poster Girgy IMO - Mantis
Girgy is my new hero! - Evilpie
Think Girgy has shown the best leopard instincts in this thread and would prob survive best in the wild. Eye of the tiger that fella - Mantis
Girgy is a m'fkn machine - Daveshoelace
relaedgc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1189
Re: Another Ruling Thread
«
Reply #22 on:
October 26, 2009, 07:57:26 AM »
Depends on the dealer, I'm normally pretty sharp and I'll make sure the pot is correct so the player will be facing 1200 more to call. If you can get the 2k in before I have done that though I don't mind.
Logged
"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster...when you gaze long into the abyss the abyss also gazes into you..."
Friedrich Nietzsche
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: Another Ruling Thread
«
Reply #23 on:
October 26, 2009, 09:42:05 AM »
Quote from: relaedgc on October 26, 2009, 07:57:26 AM
Depends on the dealer, I'm normally pretty sharp and I'll make sure the pot is correct so the player will be facing 1200 more to call. If you can get the 2k in before I have done that though I don't mind.
you mean you'll have already pulled the bets in? This is bad practice imo
Logged
Blue text
Girgy85
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9507
Re: Another Ruling Thread
«
Reply #24 on:
October 26, 2009, 11:20:09 AM »
Quote from: Cf on October 26, 2009, 09:42:05 AM
Quote from: relaedgc on October 26, 2009, 07:57:26 AM
Depends on the dealer, I'm normally pretty sharp and I'll make sure the pot is correct so the player will be facing 1200 more to call. If you can get the 2k in before I have done that though I don't mind.
you mean you'll have already pulled the bets in? This is bad practice imo
think he means changed a 1k in the pot and left the bet infront of the player and give him change!
Logged
Best poster Girgy IMO - Mantis
Girgy is my new hero! - Evilpie
Think Girgy has shown the best leopard instincts in this thread and would prob survive best in the wild. Eye of the tiger that fella - Mantis
Girgy is a m'fkn machine - Daveshoelace
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: Another Ruling Thread
«
Reply #25 on:
October 26, 2009, 01:02:03 PM »
Quote from: Girgy85 on October 26, 2009, 11:20:09 AM
Quote from: Cf on October 26, 2009, 09:42:05 AM
Quote from: relaedgc on October 26, 2009, 07:57:26 AM
Depends on the dealer, I'm normally pretty sharp and I'll make sure the pot is correct so the player will be facing 1200 more to call. If you can get the 2k in before I have done that though I don't mind.
you mean you'll have already pulled the bets in? This is bad practice imo
think he means changed a 1k in the pot and left the bet infront of the player and give him change!
He says we're facing a situation of 1200 more to call. I get the impression that he's pulled the 800 in already and is now going around saying "1200 to call". This is bad. The chips should be left in front with the announcement of "the bet is 2000".
Logged
Blue text
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...