Automatic call?

[TightEnd]

thank you for the wonderful responses

this is one of the trickiest hands since I went full time

I used all of my time bank, on Stars and I digested the following

I thought the big clue was that both players in the pot with me now had limped from UTG and UTG+1. I discounted therefore hands like QQ. I also thought AQ would have raised pre flop, although I do see it limped in early position on Stars 1-2.

I then had to think about 55. I can't see the flat caller on the flop not raising with 555 with two opponents and a club draw out

Could Matmat have 55? that was what worried me

I was putting the flat caller on clubs, possibly a weaker A. He didn't particularly worry me

Matmat did worry me, but by now timke was running out

Immediately before I called I thought to myself..."you should fold". I remember thinking I was making a mistake

this is what happened



Prewie: calls $103.85
homeboy604 said, "wooooo weeee"
vadp: calls $69.05 and is all-in
*** TURN *** [ ] []
homeboy604 said, "wow"
*** RIVER *** [ ] []
*** SHOW DOWN ***
matmat17: shows [ ] (a pair of Nines)
Prewie: shows [As ] (two pair, Aces and Kings)
Prewie collected $69.60 from side pot
vadp: mucks hand
Prewie collected $387.15 from main pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $459.75 Main pot $387.15. Side pot $69.60. | Rake $3
Board [ ]
Seat 1: dwwg folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: Prewie showed [As ] and won ($456.75) with two pair, Aces and Kings
Seat 3: kolobokk folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: homeboy604 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: cfknicks (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: abbyrick (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 7: vadp mucked [ ]
Seat 8: matmat17 showed [ ] and lost with a pair of Nines


matmat was on a marginal club draw. In my opinion the  is a necessity against two opponents to do this

Vadp? not a clue, nice of him to call the all in after I had without an ace or clubs though

[snoopy1239]

Nice 1.

I made a misread in my analysis.

Didn't realise they'd both limped into the pot first.

Yes, that makes AQ a lot less likely.

Well played.

[jezza777]

Nice pot. Jeeeeeze that is a huge semi bluff move without the nut draw there. From further play was the guy a bit of a loon or a good player?

[Nem]

From further play was the guy a bit of a loon or a good player?

 

[TightEnd]

Nice pot. Jeeeeeze that is a huge semi bluff move without the nut draw there. From further play was the guy a bit of a loon or a good player?

He was Roger Rabbit material, looney tunes


didn't know that at the time, honest!

[12barblues]

Good call (with the benefit of hindsight), I couldn't have made it.

I think Roger Rabbit  must have received Super System for Christmas. The other guy obviously had a lobotomy for his pressie.  >:?

[ifm]

You mention being full time?
Given up the day job?
I also saw you say something about a business oportunity elsewhere, tell me to sod off but i'm interested

[TightEnd]

You mention being full time?
Given up the day job?
I also saw you say something about a business oportunity elsewhere, tell me to sod off but i'm interested

I'll PM you, now sod off 

[Royal Flush]

You all failed to notice its 1-2 cash

[TightEnd]

You all failed to notice its 1-2 cash

one day I might graduate to higher levels, inhabited by a better class of fish.

[Royal Flush]

I can't beat any level of NL cash. I used to then i switched to tourneys and i cant stop making moves, apparently they dont work in small nl games!!

[Highstack]

Having already invested $42 on the flop I think that it was an automatic call, when you look at the likelyhood you are currently ahead, but I would cerainly think AQ was a possibility to be against.

I would limp with AQ as I hate raising with it (particularly ep) then play it aggressively if I hit 2 pair on a 2 suited board. Fortunately this wasn't the case and you took down a nice pot (river K would have saved you anyway although it would have been unjust).