blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 18, 2025, 06:09:57 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262307 Posts in 66604 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Spot @ gala.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Spot @ gala.  (Read 1485 times)
tight4better
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1019



View Profile
« on: April 26, 2013, 07:14:55 AM »

Quick check.. Think I played it okay.

1/1 ROE at gala, we're 5 orbits in, image is very active/LAG. Hold'em round 7 handed.

Hero (£400) UTG+1
V1 (£50) Btn
V2 (£350) bb

We open   to £4 UTG+1

5 callers, V1 button V2 bb, V2 is good reg, V1 is not as experienced but deffo not a whale.

 

We bet £14, V1 snap moves in for £45, V2 tanks 15 secs and peels.

You?

Deffo not worried about V2 at this point fwiw.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2013, 01:06:54 PM by tight4better » Logged
corkeye
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 452


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2013, 07:47:45 AM »

Ready again and edit out to make both villains stacks and positions make sense. Then we will talk!
Logged
paulhouk03
Cliqueless
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7652



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2013, 10:35:16 AM »

U mixed the stack sizes

Logged

Just me
cambridgealex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14799


#lovethegame


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2013, 11:44:26 AM »

call
Logged

Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
mulhuzz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3016



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2013, 11:52:47 AM »

don't really feel like folding when we have a pair and a straight flush draw.

don't really like raising for obv reasons, think call fine.
Logged
tight4better
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1019



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2013, 12:56:12 PM »

Ready again and edit out to make both villains stacks and positions make sense. Then we will talk!

Fixed was tired
Logged
wazz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 614



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 22, 2013, 10:39:39 AM »

If you're definitely not worried about the bigger stack having you beat at this point, and you're reasonably concerned that the first jammer has you beat some of the time (but obviously you've got outs vs everything other than A9hh) you should get more money in now to compensate for the loss of equity you face when you have to call the shortstacks' strong range.

Not like the cards that hit you on the turn allow you to get paid off by the big stack; unless of course he has the Ah and the hits, which is fairly unlikely. If he's calling £45 cold and you're confident you're ahead - not a particularly difficult read to get, that he would raise better hands than yours as he's straightforward when he has a hand but a bit chasey and callstationy and and can't lay down a hand like top pair or something - then get more money in and build up a sidepot to fight over. Make it £120.
Logged
Rexas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1963


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 22, 2013, 11:03:35 AM »

I don't actually mind raising if we're confident that we're ahead of the caller, to try and build a side pot, and I also don't mind if we raise and he folds, so we get HU with a guy who we should expect to have a ton of equity against. I also don't mind calling, although we could catch some funky turn cards that would make this hand interesting. I don't really mind either option, would personally lean towards a call if we aren't sure of where we stand vs the caller.
Logged

humour is very much encouraged, however theres humour and theres not.
I disrepectfully agree with Matt Smiley
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.054 seconds with 20 queries.