blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 23, 2025, 01:55:54 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262390 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Hotter55 FT spot
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Hotter55 FT spot  (Read 5003 times)
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: December 11, 2013, 02:35:54 PM »

is k2 better than qj? or what do you mean by better than qj:?
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
lucky_scrote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3525



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: December 11, 2013, 02:52:09 PM »

is k2 better than qj? or what do you mean by better than qj:?

Hands that have better equity than QJo against opponents range. They are these hands: 66+,A4s+,A7o+,K9s+,KTo+,QTs+

Logged

<3 ENSUING
stato_1 said, "banoffee pie i reckon"
stato_1 said, "this is delicious"
dwayne110
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 670


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: December 12, 2013, 12:31:31 AM »

The deal being top 3 heavy can be argued both ways as to how it affects our calling range surely? I.e. If we fold, we could be losing our best/one of our best spots to get a competitive stack size  to improve our chance of a top three score and reduce pur need to make higher variance plays ongoing if we get the double up. How do we measure if it's more/less of a fold when the prizepool is top heavy? Do we not have a similar risk of finishing 4th or 5th if we nit up and watch our stack dwindle hoping another player(a) is eliminated? Given the antes in play we're already very shallow too, so  ICM wise does it become more/less of a call?
Logged
Ragz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 164


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: December 12, 2013, 01:32:31 AM »

Not only is it a bad ICM call but also if villain is going to try to induce his top end and not jam it, QJo still doesn't cut it. A range like 66+,AT+,A9s+,KJs+ is about right if he's 100%, 66+,A9+,A7s+,KJ+,KTs+ if he does exclude the top end. That's using a rough % payout structure I have customed from previous MTT FT's with similar fields.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 20 queries.