blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 21, 2025, 04:20:09 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262353 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
| | |-+  Nadal getting owned.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Nadal getting owned.  (Read 4236 times)
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« on: June 29, 2006, 02:55:44 PM »

Such a shame, but he is useless on grass.
Logged
Gryff
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 459


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2006, 03:00:01 PM »

Give him a year or two and he'll be contending for major grass tournies, until then take advantage of the fact that he's a god on clay and the great odds you can get on him on clay. And lay him on grass.
Logged
Graham C
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20663


Moo


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2006, 03:40:51 PM »

So the bet I made on Nadal to win at 1.29 wasn't value?  Got out for a small loss earlier on but wish I'd have waited now Sad

Yeah he's not great on grass but he is playing a virtual nobody and even Nadal should be better than this guy, nevertheless, he is playing well and deserves his 2-1 lead.



Logged

The Baron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9558


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2006, 04:25:07 PM »

I'm not sure Nadal will ever get better on grass. He reminds me of Lendl - great at tennis, useless on grass.
Logged
ifm
If you're not part of the solution, you're a solid or a gas. Jimmy Carr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9259



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2006, 04:30:10 PM »

I'm not sure Nadal will ever get better on grass. He reminds me of Lendl - great at tennis, useless on grass.

Didn't he win wimbledon?
Logged

Sometimes you have to suffer a little bit in your youth to motivate yourself to succeed in later life.
Do you think if Bill Gates got laid in high school, do you think there'd be a Microsoft?
Of course not.
The Baron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9558


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 29, 2006, 04:31:32 PM »

I'm not sure Nadal will ever get better on grass. He reminds me of Lendl - great at tennis, useless on grass.

Didn't he win wimbledon?

Didn't think so. He was World #1 for years and won everything but was proper rubbish on grass.
Logged
Graham C
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20663


Moo


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2006, 04:35:38 PM »

Lendl only finished runner up twice, in 1986 and 1987
Logged

The Baron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9558


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2006, 04:37:03 PM »

Lendl only finished runner up twice, in 1986 and 1987

To Becker and Cash, straight sets both times.
Logged
Sark79
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6708



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2006, 04:41:07 PM »

Nadal is class.  Even though he isn't a grass court player, I would still back him
Logged
Graham C
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20663


Moo


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2006, 04:49:51 PM »

Nadal is class.  Even though he isn't a grass court player, I would still back him

had you have done at the beginning, you'd have been a bit nervous 20 mins ago Cheesy

Should win now though.
Logged

Karabiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22811


James Webb Telescope


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2006, 05:44:39 PM »

It's a little harsh writing off a nineteen year-old player as "useless on grass".

A surface that he has only played a dozen matches on and seems sure to improve.

And if Lendl was rubbish because he lost two Wimbledon finals, does that mean that Rosewall was rubbish too ?
Logged

"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated. It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time maddening and rewarding and it is without a doubt the greatest game that mankind has ever invented." - Arnold Palmer aka The King.
The Baron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9558


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 29, 2006, 07:12:18 PM »

It's a little harsh writing off a nineteen year-old player as "useless on grass".

A surface that he has only played a dozen matches on and seems sure to improve.

And if Lendl was rubbish because he lost two Wimbledon finals, does that mean that Rosewall was rubbish too ?

The guy was an amazing player but just couldn't play too well on grass. Sampras was poor on clay in a similar vein.

It doesn't make them bad players, just poor on a certain surface.
Logged
Sark79
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6708



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 29, 2006, 07:16:21 PM »

Remember Marcelo Rios.  He was great on clay, but hated grass.  He said " Grass is for Cows ".   I read on his website that he may be making a comeback.  I always liked Rios.
Logged
Rooky9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2662


TheAuditor


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: June 29, 2006, 08:26:14 PM »

all tennis as we know it is fake... 'Real Tennis' is a billiant game!
Logged

Sark79
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6708



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 29, 2006, 08:56:34 PM »

Is that not what the Royals play?    I am too much like scum for that I am afraid .  We are poor in Kilmarnock
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.145 seconds with 19 queries.