Playing AQ out of the Blinds

[byronkincaid]

I had only played one hand before against this dude but I had him pegged as a loose passive calling station, he called a pot sized bet with QJo on a low raggy flop, hit the J called a turn bet and checked river down.

When playing 6 max you have to play in the blinds a lot. I'm pretty sure raising AQ here is a winning play, standard C-bet, hit my hand on the turn, anyone play this different?

Game #3201991404: Hold'em NL ($1/$2) - 2006/08/25 - 17:44:55 (ET)
Table "Babuk" Seat 3 is the button.
Seat 2: moneytank ($148.13 in chips)
Seat 3: splash$$$ ($35.50 in chips)
Seat 4: oestgard ($432.05 in chips)
Seat 5: 91raver ($163.75 in chips)
Seat 6: Poker_pt ($337.49 in chips)
oestgard: posts small blind $1
91raver: posts big blind $2
----- HOLE CARDS -----
dealt to 91raver [Ah ]
Poker_pt: raises to $4
moneytank: folds
splash$$$: folds
oestgard: folds
91raver: raises to $16
Poker_pt: calls $12
----- FLOP ----- [ ]
91raver: bets $24
Poker_pt: calls $24
----- TURN ----- [ ][]
91raver: bets $62
Poker_pt: calls $62
----- RIVER ----- [ ][]
91raver: bets $61.75 and is all-in

[ACE2M]

I might check call on the end. If he is drawing he's almost obliged to have a stab if you check it to him. If he's got the goods your screwed either way. But it might be a little cheaper.

[byronkincaid]

yes I think check calling if he's miised some kind of draw to induce a bluff is an excellent idea.

[boldie]

I might check call on the end. If he is drawing he's almost obliged to have a stab if you check it to him. If he's got the goods your screwed either way. But it might be a little cheaper.

I'd just about have to agree with that in a ten man table situation. on a 6 man table from out of position I@d bet this.