blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 23, 2025, 01:22:41 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262390 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  STTs are the rubbish
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Go Down Print
Author Topic: STTs are the rubbish  (Read 6597 times)
ACE2M
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7832



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: December 17, 2006, 04:36:23 PM »

apologies if this was misconstrued as having a go at anyone who plays stts. I just wondered if anyone else had had the same problem as me.

There is of course money to be made and definate excitement especially if playing one at a time with decent buy ins, but 6 tabling trying to get a decent hourly rate from a proven strategy in order to earn moeny i find to just kill my enthusiam for the game.
Logged
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 17, 2006, 04:44:48 PM »

apologies if this was misconstrued as having a go at anyone who plays stts. I just wondered if anyone else had had the same problem as me.

There is of course money to be made and definate excitement especially if playing one at a time with decent buy ins, but 6 tabling trying to get a decent hourly rate from a proven strategy in order to earn moeny i find to just kill my enthusiam for the game.

I take your point, I've been there & done that, grinding away day after day, hour after hour, multi-tabling SNG's, but I look at it differently - my view is that it's a damn sight better than working! And given that it's almost risk-free, I can't think of a more gilt-edged way of making money, in or out of poker. OK, exciting it may not be, but handsome is as handsome does, eh?.....
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47397



View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: December 17, 2006, 04:51:15 PM »

apologies if this was misconstrued as having a go at anyone who plays stts. I just wondered if anyone else had had the same problem as me.

There is of course money to be made and definate excitement especially if playing one at a time with decent buy ins, but 6 tabling trying to get a decent hourly rate from a proven strategy in order to earn moeny i find to just kill my enthusiam for the game.

I take your point, I've been there & done that, grinding away day after day, hour after hour, multi-tabling SNG's, but I look at it differently - my view is that it's a damn sight better than working! And given that it's almost risk-free, I can't think of a more gilt-edged way of making money, in or out of poker. OK, exciting it may not be, but handsome is as handsome does, eh?.....

I just don't like the multi table thing. I'd rather do 1 x $100 than 4 x $25.
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
The Baron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9558


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 17, 2006, 04:58:17 PM »

apologies if this was misconstrued as having a go at anyone who plays stts. I just wondered if anyone else had had the same problem as me.

There is of course money to be made and definate excitement especially if playing one at a time with decent buy ins, but 6 tabling trying to get a decent hourly rate from a proven strategy in order to earn moeny i find to just kill my enthusiam for the game.

I take your point, I've been there & done that, grinding away day after day, hour after hour, multi-tabling SNG's, but I look at it differently - my view is that it's a damn sight better than working! And given that it's almost risk-free, I can't think of a more gilt-edged way of making money, in or out of poker. OK, exciting it may not be, but handsome is as handsome does, eh?.....

I just don't like the multi table thing. I'd rather do 1 x $100 than 4 x $25.

Agreed - and whilst it may increase the variance it will also increase the enjoyment and reduce the sense of grinding.
Logged
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47397



View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: December 17, 2006, 05:04:33 PM »

I find that if I play 1 at a time I play the players, play poker if you will.

If I play 3 or 4 at once, it's just mechanical abc sort of stuff.
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
The Baron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9558


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 17, 2006, 05:05:35 PM »

I find that if I play 1 at a time I play the players, play poker if you will.

If I play 3 or 4 at once, it's just mechanical abc sort of stuff.

 
Logged
byronkincaid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5024



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 17, 2006, 06:56:44 PM »

http://www.sngegt.com/index.php?action=SNGEGT

Quote
With this revolutionary tool you can get advice while you play with our Real Time analyzer
Logged
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: December 18, 2006, 10:43:01 AM »

http://www.sngegt.com/index.php?action=SNGEGT

Quote
With this revolutionary tool you can get advice while you play with our Real Time analyzer

ah yes and "The answer will be mathematically correct every time"...the stuff might be mathematically correct but that doesn't mean it's the right play to make every time.
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15483



View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: December 18, 2006, 10:48:39 AM »

http://www.sngegt.com/index.php?action=SNGEGT

Quote
With this revolutionary tool you can get advice while you play with our Real Time analyzer

ah yes and "The answer will be mathematically correct every time"...the stuff might be mathematically correct but that doesn't mean it's the right play to make every time.

In a typical internet STT, I would say the mathematically correct play would be the right one to make every time, given how much these things come down to pure number crunching.
Logged
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: December 18, 2006, 10:50:33 AM »

http://www.sngegt.com/index.php?action=SNGEGT

Quote
With this revolutionary tool you can get advice while you play with our Real Time analyzer

ah yes and "The answer will be mathematically correct every time"...the stuff might be mathematically correct but that doesn't mean it's the right play to make every time.

In a typical internet STT, I would say the mathematically correct play would be the right one to make every time, given how much these things come down to pure number crunching.

you're probably right..but I'm with Red on this one. I don't multi tabel 4x25$ games i play 1 100 game at a time and then playing the table becomes much more relevant IMO.
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
ifm
If you're not part of the solution, you're a solid or a gas. Jimmy Carr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9259



View Profile WWW
« Reply #25 on: December 18, 2006, 11:52:34 AM »

I find that if I play 1 at a time I play the players, play poker if you will.

If I play 3 or 4 at once, it's just mechanical abc sort of stuff.

I find multi tabling them works better for me because it actually stops me making suicidal bluffs, poorly timed resteals etc.
ABC poker is the more profitable method (for me) in STT's.
Logged

Sometimes you have to suffer a little bit in your youth to motivate yourself to succeed in later life.
Do you think if Bill Gates got laid in high school, do you think there'd be a Microsoft?
Of course not.
AndyG
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 90


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: December 18, 2006, 11:56:31 AM »

I have never really got into STT's as I dont trust that some players are not playing together. However I have to agree with the earlier coment that PLO is now the best value cash game on most sites, Until a year ago I had never played unless I was bored after being busted out at a comp and sat down to play some cash in the casino and my method was to call all the way down and lay my cards face up at the end to see if the dealer pushed the pot my way LOL however now by some miricle I consider myself a better than average PLO player due to spending hours and hours online to the point that its now almost to easy to make what I call ridiculous money online on these tables as the Hold Em players venture into omaha and bet their flopped nut straight to the max onlt to leave skint.
Logged
Timaloy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 171



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: December 18, 2006, 12:14:16 PM »

r bigger chance of people working togter in cash games than in STTs where the ammount of money to be made is limited.
Logged
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: December 18, 2006, 01:01:44 PM »

r bigger chance of people working togter in cash games than in STTs where the ammount of money to be made is limited.

Especially PLO - low limit they are all on Skype! Wink
Logged
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: December 18, 2006, 02:02:44 PM »

r bigger chance of people working togter in cash games than in STTs where the ammount of money to be made is limited.

Especially PLO - low limit they are all on Skype! Wink

Really? Is there evidence to this effect?

Wow!
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.196 seconds with 20 queries.