blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 19, 2025, 08:28:50 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262324 Posts in 66605 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  poker i.q test
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: poker i.q test  (Read 2462 times)
cambo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2441

back to the tic cave son


View Profile
« on: May 03, 2007, 12:59:52 PM »

if anyone has a spare tens mins take the poker i.q test on the right hand side of the cardrunners.com page . i scored 99 , the top pros scores varied from about 125-150 . differant scenarios based on 13 sub catagories all multiple choice . good fun have a look
Logged

bring back Fergus! and the bandit! free the glasgow 2!
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2007, 01:02:23 PM »

yeah..saw it a while ago and discussed this with doubleup in stanleys...there are some questions that we both have doubts on as to whether the answers they count as correct are actually correct.

Mainly the "A pro player loses a lot of money playing A10 from under the gun"..the correct answer according to the test is Yes..we both agreed it should be no as A10 from UTG simply is an awfull hand and shouldn't be played.
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
matt674
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10250



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2007, 01:05:07 PM »

the top pros scores varied from about 125-150 .

Some of the "selected" top pros scores varied from 125-150, i'm sure there were scores lower than that but their blushes were spared by their results not being released Smiley
Logged

sponsored by Fyffes
matt674
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10250



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2007, 01:07:36 PM »

Mainly the "A pro player loses a lot of money playing A10 from under the gun"..the correct answer according to the test is Yes..we both agreed it should be no as A10 from UTG simply is an awfull hand and shouldn't be played.

Huh?

ok, monkey may be missing something here but question asks "a player loses money from playing A10 utg" and the answer is "yes" - therefore he loses money.

You say it should be "no" - therefore he wins money, but then say its an awful hand and shouldnt be played.........
Logged

sponsored by Fyffes
cambo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2441

back to the tic cave son


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2007, 01:08:23 PM »

no for that 1 its saying for a poker pro its typically a losing hand playing a10 from utg not that hes been losing money playing it
Logged

bring back Fergus! and the bandit! free the glasgow 2!
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2007, 01:09:15 PM »

Mainly the "A pro player loses a lot of money playing A10 from under the gun"..the correct answer according to the test is Yes..we both agreed it should be no as A10 from UTG simply is an awfull hand and shouldn't be played.

Huh?

ok, monkey may be missing something here but question asks "a player loses money from playing A10 utg" and the answer is "yes" - therefore he loses money.

You say it should be "no" - therefore he wins money, but then say its an awful hand and shouldnt be played.........

lol no because you can't lose money if you don't play the hand. Doubleup and I both argued that a pro-player doesn't play A10 off from UTG and therefore doesn't lose money playing it.
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
cambo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2441

back to the tic cave son


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2007, 01:12:04 PM »

ffs..lol heres the exact question " in a full ring game AT off suit is typically a losing hand UTG for most poker pros. ture or false?
Logged

bring back Fergus! and the bandit! free the glasgow 2!
matt674
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10250



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2007, 01:12:49 PM »

without actually reading the quiz it just sounds as though the questions haven't been worded or written very well leading to ambiguity.

Is it american by any chance?  
Logged

sponsored by Fyffes
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2007, 01:13:43 PM »

ffs..lol heres the exact question " in a full ring game AT off suit is typically a losing hand UTG for most poker pros. ture or false?

yes indeed..and we argue that the answer should be no!..most pokerpro's wouldn't play A10 off suit UTG. Smiley
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
cambo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2441

back to the tic cave son


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2007, 01:15:34 PM »

lol it doesnt say anywhere that they play it tho!
Logged

bring back Fergus! and the bandit! free the glasgow 2!
matt674
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10250



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 03, 2007, 01:15:57 PM »

ffs..lol heres the exact question " in a full ring game AT off suit is typically a losing hand UTG for most poker pros. ture or false?

i think this is the point boldie is trying to make and why i think it hasn't been worded well.

boldie is saying that the "correct" answer according to the test is "true" when in effect most pro's would lay down A10 o/s utg and therefore the answer should be "false" as they are not losing any money because they choose not to play it.

if the question read "in a full ring game playing AT off suit is typically a losing hand UTG for most poker pros. ture or false?" i think the answer would be more accurate.
Logged

sponsored by Fyffes
Ironside
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 41931



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 03, 2007, 01:16:42 PM »

i just got 775 which far out scored anyone in hte history of poker they refused to give me my award and accused me of cheating

or maybe i was just too lazy to fill it in
Logged

I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.
cambo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2441

back to the tic cave son


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 03, 2007, 01:17:09 PM »

lol i know what he ment matt
Logged

bring back Fergus! and the bandit! free the glasgow 2!
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: May 03, 2007, 01:18:39 PM »

ffs..lol heres the exact question " in a full ring game AT off suit is typically a losing hand UTG for most poker pros. ture or false?

i think this is the point boldie is trying to make and why i think it hasn't been worded well.

boldie is saying that the "correct" answer according to the test is "true" when in effect most pro's would lay down A10 o/s utg and therefore the answer should be "false" as they are not losing any money because they choose not to play it.

if the question read "in a full ring game playing AT off suit is typically a losing hand UTG for most poker pros. ture or false?" i think the answer would be more accurate.


indeed..typical American IQ test..made up so they can actually score higher than 76 on one.

Sits and waits for MadYank to show up Wink
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: May 03, 2007, 01:20:55 PM »

Instacall.
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.105 seconds with 20 queries.