Ruling please!

[M3boy]

BTW Jim, my 100% record against you all in still stands - as you didnt win the pot either.

Dream come true to find you BOTH on the flush draw vs my 2 pr

Was close to 15k in that pot as well, and all I had to do was avoid 6 outs.

[turny]

I'll send you a photofit.

nice one  is he a big f#ck#r? 

I'll send him to Leighton Buzzard on Fridays. Open invitation I'm sure.

he wouldnt get away with it there thats for sure!

[turny]

seriously though looks like a joke ruling to me and i personally agree with dik9 about the calling of cameras, this has set a precedent and i hope doesnt lead to all comps stop starting every five mins for rulings.

who made the ruling out of interest tighty? can u tell me that much?

[portfolio]

Was disgusting Tighty.

He is a heavy donator in cash games, so I would not want him banned.

If he wasnt such, I would say ban them.

Out and Out cheat.

nice double standards, raping cheats in cash is  a fantastic punishment  tho

[Karabiner]

I think that the moral of the story is that TD's must have house dealers to make proper rulings.

I remember that Rob (Nightfly) would not give rulings in player(punter) dealt cash games in Gala Notts.

Not a bad judge imo.

[turny]

I think that the moral of the story is that TD's must have house dealers to make proper rulings.

I remember that Rob (Nightfly) would not give rulings in player(punter) dealt cash games in Gala Notts.

Not a bad judge imo.

so what did he do then let them argue amongst themselves with the last one standings decision being accepted as right?

could be interesting 

[TightEnd]

I think that the moral of the story is that TD's must have house dealers to make proper rulings.

I remember that Rob (Nightfly) would not give rulings in player(punter) dealt cash games in Gala Notts.

Not a bad judge imo.

but not for a tournament surely?

besides the venues charge fees, part of that must involve TDing where necessary


(and dealers too, in an ideal world hence the a\bove argument would be moot)

[M3boy]

Have dealer dealt tourneys - problem solved.

Afterall, we pay juice dont we?

I was very suprised to see NO dealers last night for what was effectively a £150 f/o

[Karabiner]

I think that the moral of the story is that TD's must have house dealers to make proper rulings.

I remember that Rob (Nightfly) would not give rulings in player(punter) dealt cash games in Gala Notts.

Not a bad judge imo.

but not for a tournament surely?

besides the venues charge fees, part of that must involve TDing where necessary


(and dealers too, in an ideal world hence the a\bove argument would be moot)

What I'm saying is that the TD cannot give a PROPER ruling in this instance.

Because the dealer is a player and thusly not impartial, any ruling is never going to be "by the book" so to speak.

[TightEnd]

Have dealer dealt tourneys - problem solved.

Afterall, we pay juice dont we?

I was very suprised to see NO dealers last night for what was effectively a £150 f/o

Agreed, surprised and disappointed