turn action

[AgentChip109]

3 of us have just been discussing this hand. be interested in all ur views


Full Tilt Poker Game #4659068407: Table Rosco - $0.50/$1 - No Limit Hold'em - 22:44:38 ET - 2007/12/28
Seat 1: VincePot ($139.55)
Seat 2: johnnyhf1 ($32.85)
Seat 3: dm2323 ($0), is sitting out
Seat 4: Edgy811 ($228.60)
Seat 5: isuccc ($29.50)
Seat 6: Pony Princess ($111.25)
Seat 7: rlatjsdo ($120.05)
Seat 8: ar345 ($199.05)
Seat 9: ayah -- ni han ($58.65)
isuccc posts the small blind of $0.50
Pony Princess posts the big blind of $1
The button is in seat #4
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Edgy811 [ ]
rlatjsdo folds
ar345 folds
dm2323 stands up
ayah -- ni han folds
VincePot folds
johnnyhf1 calls $1
Edgy811 raises to $4
isuccc folds
Pony Princess calls $3
johnnyhf1 folds
*** FLOP *** [ ]
Pony Princess checks
Edgy811 bets $6.50
Pony Princess calls $6.50
*** TURN *** [ ] []
Pony Princess checks
Edgy811 has 15 seconds left to act
Edgy811 bets $14
Pony Princess has 15 seconds left to act
Pony Princess raises to $30


what is your play here and why??

thanks in advance

[AlexMartin]

I fold. Why? Because ur beaten a far higher % of the time than ur not. Villain dependant, when .50/1 cash players flat the flop then min check raise the turn, you are toast.

[jpean]

Firstly, we have to think that the only thing he could have is a big Ace, Jack, Queens, Aces or a set.

But he plays like this Jack fear him... so he has something. Maybe that he fears the flush...

I think that I would make the calling station and call everything he bet, but never re raise. he check ? I check.

On the Other hand, I'm not sure that going All-in is a bad thing here...

[Tragic]

I agree with Alex.

[cooker3]

I call and see what he does on the river

[Longy]

Baluga theorem* ftw, Fold.

You are beat more often than not here, this is a super strong line villain is showing plus its full ring which is total nit fest.




* Baluga theorem is named after a 2p2 poster, who's rule was that if we get check raised on the turn in a raised pot after cbetting. 1 pair is almost never good.

[AlexMartin]

Baluga theorem* ftw, Fold.

You are beat more often than not here, this is a super strong line villain is showing plus its full ring which is total nit fest.




* Baluga theorem is named after a 2p2 poster, who's rule was that if we get check raised on the turn in a raised pot after cbetting. 1 pair is almost never good.

It does make you look disgustingly strong which is why it is such a good rep v TAG regs and deep stacks though

[Longy]

Baluga theorem* ftw, Fold.

You are beat more often than not here, this is a super strong line villain is showing plus its full ring which is total nit fest.




* Baluga theorem is named after a 2p2 poster, who's rule was that if we get check raised on the turn in a raised pot after cbetting. 1 pair is almost never good.

It does make you look disgustingly strong which is why it is such a good rep v TAG regs and deep stacks though

This is true Alex, fortunately most people aren't as creative as you and therefore make decision like this easier.

[The_Diamond]

Without notes on the villain I would fold but I think I'm almost getting to the stage where I wouldn't as lately a lot players are using these small turn raises to represent a stronger hand than they have, or they are morons with JQs who chase overcards and backdoor draws. 

[AgentChip109]

sorry im late in getting back on this

wot happened was, in my heart i felt i was beat but i couldnt find the fold button. upthemariners was saying i was beat, my other mate wasnt as sure. in the end i did push and he showed  for the set

bad play by me but ill learn for next time