I folded.
The result is irrelevant of what happened next..but I won the SNG LOL
My..undoubtedly flawed..thinking was
- there are two shorter stacks who have to gamble before I do..itm rationale I suppose
- the large stack can eliminate me
- the pusher can cripple me
- I want to be the pusher with AK not the caller unless we are at the typical stage of a SNG/stack sizes where I am compelled to
I would be very interested to hear Longy's "correct" justification for folding
Well i think you have just said it somewhere in there.
Assuming someone gets knocked out in this hand , we have two shorter stacks than us on the bubble and at this level the chipleader will no doubt just dominate the table allowing us to make the money.
If we get our money in here the chip leader folds alot I think as our hand has to be jj+ ak+ here and he is likely to be miles behind our range and fold.If we do win we are still not chip leader on the bubble and therefore are likely to have to sit there while we bleed chips as the chipleader dominates the table and we can never call without aa or kk until the bubble bursts.
Of course the worst scenario which happens the most often is that the 3bettor in our hand doubles through the chip leader and we are forced to cling on in a non bubble situation with the two big stack shoving into our blinds.
I still get it in here but it is close imo.