blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 15, 2025, 04:46:14 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262258 Posts in 66603 Topics by 16988 Members
Latest Member: Jengajenga921
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Deep (250bb) tricy spot HU.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Deep (250bb) tricy spot HU.  (Read 4266 times)
UpTheMariners
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1888


We Only Sing When We're Fishing


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: May 19, 2008, 03:09:00 PM »

the only winners in this hand is the rake and the bad beat tin.  Wink
Logged

TheChipPrince
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8664



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: May 19, 2008, 03:27:48 PM »

just fkin shib it in m8

u reckon? or is flatting and jamming any non-diamond brick on turn better?

Is that getting a little over-complicated?  umm maybe not, but a tough spot if a danger card comes though...
Logged

The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.

RIP- TheChipPrince - $17,165
AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8039


rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: May 19, 2008, 03:52:42 PM »

the only winners in this hand is the rake and the bad beat tin.  Wink

lol, not a bad beat at all. I just think there is a more optimal way to play the hand. What u reckon?

just fkin shib it in m8

u reckon? or is flatting and jamming any non-diamond brick on turn better?

Is that getting a little over-complicated?  umm maybe not, but a tough spot if a danger card comes though...

Yeah this did cross my mind when i shoved tbh. But there isnt THAT much of the deck that scares me. Only 13 cards rly. Ill show my math on it once iv made sure its roughly right. I think flatting and jamming a brick turn is significantly more optimal here.
Logged
TheChipPrince
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8664



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: May 19, 2008, 03:56:29 PM »

the only winners in this hand is the rake and the bad beat tin.  Wink

lol, not a bad beat at all. I just think there is a more optimal way to play the hand. What u reckon?

just fkin shib it in m8

u reckon? or is flatting and jamming any non-diamond brick on turn better?

Is that getting a little over-complicated?  umm maybe not, but a tough spot if a danger card comes though...

Yeah this did cross my mind when i shoved tbh. But there isnt THAT much of the deck that scares me. Only 13 cards rly. Ill show my math on it once iv made sure its roughly right. I think flatting and jamming a brick turn is significantly more optimal here.

Just a thought, say you flat call... Out of interest, what do you do if:

a) A of diamonds comes on the turn
b) 2 of diamonds comes on the turn

Assuming he then shoves all-in...
Logged

The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.

RIP- TheChipPrince - $17,165
AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8039


rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ


View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: May 19, 2008, 04:18:12 PM »

fold, fold.
Logged
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: May 19, 2008, 04:22:14 PM »

the only winners in this hand is the rake and the bad beat tin.  Wink

lol, not a bad beat at all. I just think there is a more optimal way to play the hand. What u reckon?

just fkin shib it in m8

u reckon? or is flatting and jamming any non-diamond brick on turn better?

Is that getting a little over-complicated?  umm maybe not, but a tough spot if a danger card comes though...

Yeah this did cross my mind when i shoved tbh. But there isnt THAT much of the deck that scares me. Only 13 cards rly. Ill show my math on it once iv made sure its roughly right. I think flatting and jamming a brick turn is significantly more optimal here.

OK but who calls you on a brick turn?..surely not AQ off.
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
UpTheMariners
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1888


We Only Sing When We're Fishing


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: May 19, 2008, 04:26:35 PM »

i think you've gotta RR this lead. if he doesnt have he may put you on it and stack off with a worse pair with diamond or AT. if you had 99 with diamond would you stack off? player dependant obv. i would worry about an overpair either hes more likely to have a flush. 
« Last Edit: May 19, 2008, 04:29:12 PM by UpTheMariners » Logged

AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8039


rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ


View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: May 19, 2008, 05:11:54 PM »

the only winners in this hand is the rake and the bad beat tin.  Wink

lol, not a bad beat at all. I just think there is a more optimal way to play the hand. What u reckon?

just fkin shib it in m8

u reckon? or is flatting and jamming any non-diamond brick on turn better?

Is that getting a little over-complicated?  umm maybe not, but a tough spot if a danger card comes though...

Yeah this did cross my mind when i shoved tbh. But there isnt THAT much of the deck that scares me. Only 13 cards rly. Ill show my math on it once iv made sure its roughly right. I think flatting and jamming a brick turn is significantly more optimal here.

OK but who calls you on a brick turn?..surely not AQ off.

? i have enough fold equity to freeze out hands on the turn that im flipping against if we get it in on the flop.
Logged
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6260



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: May 20, 2008, 06:03:28 PM »

Hey man,

Interesting one. I think you have to shove it in.

If you flat call, there's too many cards that are ugly could come on the turn...any diamond and any non-diamond Q/K/Ace and you don't know if you're still miles ahead or miles behind.

Just an unlucky hand I think...every chance you were dominant favourite here rather than a slight favourite...

Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8039


rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ


View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: May 21, 2008, 01:05:51 AM »

Hey man,

Interesting one. I think you have to shove it in.

If you flat call, there's too many cards that are ugly could come on the turn...any diamond and any non-diamond Q/K/Ace and you don't know if you're still miles ahead or miles behind.

Just an unlucky hand I think...every chance you were dominant favourite here rather than a slight favourite...



? v what? He aint gonna go broke here with underpair with diamond.

Ill post the math later this week. We have position remember on the turn.
Logged
UpTheMariners
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1888


We Only Sing When We're Fishing


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: May 21, 2008, 01:19:04 AM »

i think the baddy could call off with 99 w/diamond & A10 here
Logged

AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8039


rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ


View Profile WWW
« Reply #26 on: May 22, 2008, 10:21:40 PM »

i think the baddy could call off with 99 w/diamond & A10 here

10% of his ai on flop range? Or less?
Logged
kingkev
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: May 25, 2008, 08:27:27 PM »

Alex as a player who's logged about 40k hands at 200nl HU i'm perfectly happy getting AI on the flop.
Btw HU players snap call 4 bets OOP way too often with weak holdings (alot weaker than AQ), this scary board can be great for villain to lead with a wide range and in return i love Totalise's idea of min-raising the flop as some players make gigantic spewy shoves with x or worse pair w/ d because "they had fold equity"
Flatting / jamming a safe turn would be an ok line with overpair no diamond.
Logged

there can be only one
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.201 seconds with 20 queries.