Posted by: doubleupTo imply that the odds against TT being dominated are 50-1 is idiotic and helps no one.
I did not imply those odds. I categorically discounted A-A and K-K and said Q-Q was unlikely. So I implied the odds were much greater.
gribbo's opinion was that we are likely dominated and my opinion was that we are not likely dominated. What was you opinion again? If you don't post one but just seek to mock other opinion you are Dubai. You have not contributed anything helpful to this discussion yourself by the way. You have just waited until the result was posted and then chastised my comments in retrospect. This undoubtedly takes great skill. You are coming across as quite a grumpy doubleup at present and a little bit sour. If you are running bad I am sorry.
On this occasion gribbo was spot on in his analysis and fair play to him. He says he plays a lot of low limit games and people adjust their raise size in accordance with hand strength. I think this is an easy strat to twigg if you are familiar with it. I am clearly not so familar with it.
ok when they make a nobel prize for poker I'm sure you'll win it.
Author