Social Networking is everywhere now-a-days!

[WYSINWYG]

other story today

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20081223/tuk-third-of-teachers-want-creationism-6323e80.html

Oh boy.

Teach it in a religious class if it must be taught - but it has no place in a science class.  Science is based on putting forward a theory based on evidence, looking at counter-evidence and testing and re-testing.  A scientific theory is falsifiable, not something invented to match the stories of a book that's thousands of years old.

Creationism ignores scientific knowledge and advancement in many different areas including: biology, astronomy, geology, palaeontology, and physics.  All of the more 'precise' arguments put forward by Creationists that can be tested have been disproved by science.  The 'first cause' argument cannot be disproved, as it sits 'outside' science.  But therefore, it has no place in the science class...

I'm amazed that you're having a pop at religion at this time of year.

What has science really proved after all, conclusively. Scientists are proving each other wrong all the time, and they keep coming up with just 'theories' like 'theory of evolution', 'theory of Big Bang' (whatever that is). When they stop coming up with theories and start coming up with FACT, then I'll listen.
The universe had to come from somewhere: FACT
This person who made it had to  be intelligent: FACT
This must have been God: FACT

[ ] Saw Charles Darwin make even a blade of grass recently.

top class level WP

Just prepping myself for family visit for the holidays.

[X] Got 'The Big Bang' by Patrick Moore et al, looks like an amazing gift 

[ ] Remembered that the recipient rejects the whole notion in principle 

/FML

[boldie]

other story today

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20081223/tuk-third-of-teachers-want-creationism-6323e80.html

Oh boy.

Teach it in a religious class if it must be taught - but it has no place in a science class.  Science is based on putting forward a theory based on evidence, looking at counter-evidence and testing and re-testing.  A scientific theory is falsifiable, not something invented to match the stories of a book that's thousands of years old.

Creationism ignores scientific knowledge and advancement in many different areas including: biology, astronomy, geology, palaeontology, and physics.  All of the more 'precise' arguments put forward by Creationists that can be tested have been disproved by science.  The 'first cause' argument cannot be disproved, as it sits 'outside' science.  But therefore, it has no place in the science class...

I'm amazed that you're having a pop at religion at this time of year.

What has science really proved after all, conclusively. Scientists are proving each other wrong all the time, and they keep coming up with just 'theories' like 'theory of evolution', 'theory of Big Bang' (whatever that is). When they stop coming up with theories and start coming up with FACT, then I'll listen.
The universe had to come from somewhere: FACT
This person who made it had to  be intelligent: FACT
This must have been God: FACT

[ ] Saw Charles Darwin make even a blade of grass recently.

top class level WP

Just prepping myself for family visit for the holidays.

[X] Got 'The Big Bang' by Patrick Moore et al, looks like an amazing gift 

[ ] Remembered that the recipient rejects the whole notion in principle 

/FML

Seriously?...in that case..a top class gift, respect to you..and..erm..nice having known you as you'll be burned at the stake

[Nakor]

Bolts thread removed

[bolt pp]

Bolts thread removed

some religous bastard's grassed me up!!

[boldie]

Bolts thread removed

Quite right as well..he's nothing more than a pen thief!

[boldie]

Bolts thread removed

some religous bastard's grassed me up!!

I blame Kin

[WYSINWYG]

other story today

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20081223/tuk-third-of-teachers-want-creationism-6323e80.html

Oh boy.

Teach it in a religious class if it must be taught - but it has no place in a science class.  Science is based on putting forward a theory based on evidence, looking at counter-evidence and testing and re-testing.  A scientific theory is falsifiable, not something invented to match the stories of a book that's thousands of years old.

Creationism ignores scientific knowledge and advancement in many different areas including: biology, astronomy, geology, palaeontology, and physics.  All of the more 'precise' arguments put forward by Creationists that can be tested have been disproved by science.  The 'first cause' argument cannot be disproved, as it sits 'outside' science.  But therefore, it has no place in the science class...

I'm amazed that you're having a pop at religion at this time of year.

What has science really proved after all, conclusively. Scientists are proving each other wrong all the time, and they keep coming up with just 'theories' like 'theory of evolution', 'theory of Big Bang' (whatever that is). When they stop coming up with theories and start coming up with FACT, then I'll listen.
The universe had to come from somewhere: FACT
This person who made it had to  be intelligent: FACT
This must have been God: FACT

[ ] Saw Charles Darwin make even a blade of grass recently.

top class level WP

Just prepping myself for family visit for the holidays.

[X] Got 'The Big Bang' by Patrick Moore et al, looks like an amazing gift 

[ ] Remembered that the recipient rejects the whole notion in principle 

/FML

Seriously?...in that case..a top class gift, respect to you..and..erm..nice having known you as you'll be burned at the stake

Yes mate, it's this one

http://www.amazon.com/Bang-Complete-Universe-Brian-May/dp/0801889855/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1230063647&sr=1-8

Well impressed when I received it, nearly kept it for myself. He'll use it for that fire he's gonna use on me, along with the 'Selfish Gene' by Dawkins that he got last year. If I survive to next year I'll get him a Bible, just to confuse the ******.

Edit: you can tell it's Amazon USA

http://www.amazon.com/tag/science/forum/ref=cm_cd_dp_rt_tft_tp?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=FxZ58KVEERYS5E&cdThread=Tx1B23A0BPWFP2U

[pokerfan]

[bolt pp]

LOL

[phatomch]

they banned me, even when i said surely forgivness is what the big guy would want, they still banned me

[bolt pp]

they banned me, even when i said surely forgivness is what the big guy would want, they still banned me

They saw what you've been posting on the PHA board and didnt want a donk on their forum

I'm pretty sure that's why i was banned

[kinboshi]

Bolts thread removed

some religous bastard's grassed me up!!

I blame Kin

Go to hell.






(do not pass go, and do not collect £200)

[WYSINWYG]

Are there blondes on that Christian site? Some of the posters look very familiar.

[Robert HM]

... and lo He did smite the thread

Click to see full-size image.

[boldie]

... and lo He did smite the thread

Click to see full-size image.