blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 11, 2025, 10:08:58 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262839 Posts in 66615 Topics by 16992 Members
Latest Member: Rmf22
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  The Lounge
| | |-+  Should exctasy be downgraded to class B?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Poll
Question: Should exctasy be downgraded to class B?
Yes
No
I dont know

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Should exctasy be downgraded to class B?  (Read 19019 times)
Wardonkey
No ordinary donkey!
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3645



View Profile
« Reply #90 on: February 12, 2009, 06:07:33 PM »

Just one difference between me and bolt.

roids?

1/2 a point
Logged

EEEEEEEEEE-AAAAAAAAWWWWW
mondatoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22507



View Profile
« Reply #91 on: February 12, 2009, 06:08:39 PM »

The % of the 33 who voted no but have actually taken Ecstasy? 0% maybe?

I aint ever took it and voted no

I agree with bolt the other factors are also relevant imo

For instance people who have taken quite a few e's in one night are pretty much non responsive haven't got a clue what there doing where they are or nowt,that's pretty horrible imo.BTW this is totally different to being smashed off the drink,i aint seen anyone in as bad a state off achohol as I have ecstasy
Logged
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« Reply #92 on: February 12, 2009, 06:15:09 PM »

The % of the 33 who voted no but have actually taken Ecstasy? 0% maybe?

I aint ever took it and voted no

I agree with bolt the other factors are also relevant imo

For instance people who have taken quite a few e's in one night are pretty much non responsive haven't got a clue what there doing where they are or nowt,that's pretty horrible imo.BTW this is totally different to being smashed off the drink,i aint seen anyone in as bad a state off achohol as I have ecstasy


But surely this is a human deficiency and not the drug? Legalization and education about drugs is far better than prohibition, dirty drugs, drug dealers and non educated users imo...

Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10906



View Profile
« Reply #93 on: February 12, 2009, 06:18:03 PM »

What other factors affect the seriousness of the drug if not the death rate?

I thought the social impact (people commiting crimes to get money for it n stuff) on ecstasy was pretty low too? So the news has been telling me.

I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to drugs, but like to think I'm always open to new info. Would you care to elaborate on what the other factors are that you're mentioning.

potency(how mashed you get in comparrison to other drugs) it's pretty much up there with anything barring crack and herion which are just in a different league, how can you have a drug that can get you so mashed and out of control, pretty much up there with anything else be a class B?

i know people who have been doing pills for nearly 20 years and i see how fcked they are now, i cant believe that hasent got something to do with pills, although i dont think theyve monitored the long term effects that in depthly yet as its kinda a new drug so they dont really know what the effects will be when you get older.

what would you get more mashed on, cocaine(not crack) or E's? E's easily yet coke is a recognised class A drug and no one wants to change that, if you were to say look how many people have died though from coke the alcohol and tobacco issue is where it all falls down for me, how many people have died from them and whats next in terms of deaths..... prescription drugs! so the three of the biggest killers are legal?

Logged
Karabiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22825


James Webb Telescope


View Profile
« Reply #94 on: February 12, 2009, 06:25:10 PM »

I remember seeing a table a year or so ago that listed the drugs by how much damage they did physically.

As I recall, nicotine and alcohol were very close if not at the very top of the list and were said to cause more damage to the human body than almost everything including heroin. Obviously pure forms of the drugs were used for comparison as opposed to "street" grade. I believe it was part of an argument to legalise all drugs.

So it's really a matter of how one classes "dangerous".
Logged

"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated. It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time maddening and rewarding and it is without a doubt the greatest game that mankind has ever invented." - Arnold Palmer aka The King.
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« Reply #95 on: February 12, 2009, 06:27:02 PM »

Coke is rated higher due to the psychological dependency it has. E's are easily far less addictive.
Logged
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« Reply #96 on: February 12, 2009, 06:28:49 PM »

I remember seeing a table a year or so ago that listed the drugs by how much damage they did physically.

As I recall, nicotine and alcohol were very close if not at the very top of the list and were said to cause more damage to the human body than almost everything including heroin. Obviously pure forms of the drugs were used for comparison as opposed to "street" grade. I believe it was part of an argument to legalise all drugs.

So it's really a matter of how one classes "dangerous".

was it this table?

Logged
Karabiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22825


James Webb Telescope


View Profile
« Reply #97 on: February 12, 2009, 06:29:12 PM »

Coke is rated higher due to the psychological dependency it has. E's are easily far less addictive.

I think you have to differentiate between coke and crack here.
Logged

"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated. It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time maddening and rewarding and it is without a doubt the greatest game that mankind has ever invented." - Arnold Palmer aka The King.
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« Reply #98 on: February 12, 2009, 06:33:24 PM »

Coke is rated higher due to the psychological dependency it has. E's are easily far less addictive.

I think you have to differentiate between coke and crack here.

Pure cocaine and crack are the same thing. Street powder form is cut so heavily that you'll most probably get 30-60% strength. I laugh at how cocaine in powder form is glamorized yet crack is the complete opposite - yet they are both the same thing, just that crack is freebase.
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10906



View Profile
« Reply #99 on: February 12, 2009, 06:37:15 PM »

Coke is rated higher due to the psychological dependency it has. E's are easily far less addictive.

I think you have to differentiate between coke and crack here.

Pure cocaine and crack are the same thing. Street powder form is cut so heavily that you'll most probably get 30-60% strength. I laugh at how cocaine in powder form is glamorized yet crack is the complete opposite - yet they are both the same thing, just that crack is freebase.

I have never in all my life heard of anyone commiting crimes(robbing houses, old people) to feed a coke(not rocks) habit!
Logged
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« Reply #100 on: February 12, 2009, 06:51:03 PM »

I have never in all my life heard of anyone commiting crimes(robbing houses, old people) to feed a coke(not rocks) habit!

Quote
Street powder form is cut so heavily that you'll most probably get 30-60% strength. Crack is freebase

DUCY?

Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10906



View Profile
« Reply #101 on: February 12, 2009, 06:55:52 PM »

I have never in all my life heard of anyone commiting crimes(robbing houses, old people) to feed a coke(not rocks) habit!

Quote
Street powder form is cut so heavily that you'll most probably get 30-60% strength. Crack is freebase

DUCY?



its not just that it's cut, you would get a much more potent effect from smoking the same bit from the rock than you would sniffing it as powder.
Logged
Jon MW
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6203



View Profile
« Reply #102 on: February 12, 2009, 06:58:54 PM »


ste?
Logged

Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield

2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain  - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
Wardonkey
No ordinary donkey!
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3645



View Profile
« Reply #103 on: February 12, 2009, 07:01:11 PM »


That would have been 5/8ths...
Logged

EEEEEEEEEE-AAAAAAAAWWWWW
byronkincaid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5024



View Profile
« Reply #104 on: February 12, 2009, 07:36:49 PM »

I have never in all my life heard of anyone commiting crimes(robbing houses, old people) to feed a coke(not rocks) habit!

Quote
Street powder form is cut so heavily that you'll most probably get 30-60% strength. Crack is freebase

DUCY?



its not just that it's cut, you would get a much more potent effect from smoking the same bit from the rock than you would sniffing it as powder.

so if you buy crack and crush it up you get snortable pure charlie? how many rocks would make a gram roughly?

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.143 seconds with 22 queries.