blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 23, 2025, 02:21:35 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262378 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Another DoN sit and go (52$)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Another DoN sit and go (52$)  (Read 3477 times)
dousche
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 667



View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2009, 02:10:03 PM »

Seriously this is a turbo muck and if you think this is close you are playing far too loose on the bubble of DON's.

Given we have little fold equity and given the stack sizes i am pretty sure ak is a pass here. Try qq+ here.

Thanks for the feedback. I have a reasonable grasp of sit and go's and FWIW play very tight in these. Just some bubble situations I'm trying to get a grasp of

Any idea why he's opening so much when he's basically locked up the money?

because he can? power trip? he's losing hardly any equity by doubling up one of you shorties (can most likely still pass into the money) and gaining the lot when he knocks you out. him raising every pot stops you guys from picking up the odd pot here and there from the medium stacks and bringing it back towards parity. im pretty indifferent between raising lots and passing into the money - but then again im no sng expert, especially satellite types. might be interesting to see what tom has to say on this, he played a lot of the step-type tournies and has a great grasp of bubble play
Logged
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2009, 02:11:32 PM »


Any idea why he's opening so much when he's basically locked up the money?


Stems back to his childhood perhaps?

(no offence intended if you're googling yourself JTM)

Maybe he's just having fun?
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
TheChipPrince
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8664



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2009, 02:12:22 PM »

I know I have no fold equity in this spot.

Does the fact that he keeps opening before me have any bearing? Saying shove atc is easy if it's unopened and I don't really want to shove from UTG

If he's opening before you literally every hand, then that isn't necessarily a bad thing.
It certainly doesn't legitimize our taking 65% on a double-up or bust.

We just don't have many options, and have to sit tight and hope that his pointless aggression catalyses something with one of the other players.

I disagree thats its pointless aggression partly, 95% of the time everyone passes, 19 times out of 20 he adds 300 to his stack, which gives him 20% towards a free shot (5 raises = 1500 stack of the 3 shorties), when he gets caught like this time to take a shot at taking someone out...

Ok, its not 'the best' tactic, but I dont think its awful play from him, the push is far worse.

That make sense?
Logged

The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.

RIP- TheChipPrince - $17,165
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2009, 02:14:29 PM »

In terms of the equity it gains him for that individual tournament, the aggression is pointless. It doesn't lose him much (if anything) so it's not a "bad" play either. Pointless is the operative word

Maybe it's a time thing. He wants the bubble over as soon as possible to up his hourly rate? Though I still don't see the point tbh.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2009, 02:20:24 PM by thetank » Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
George2Loose
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15127



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 11, 2009, 02:14:56 PM »

Seriously this is a turbo muck and if you think this is close you are playing far too loose on the bubble of DON's.

Given we have little fold equity and given the stack sizes i am pretty sure ak is a pass here. Try qq+ here.

Thanks for the feedback. I have a reasonable grasp of sit and go's and FWIW play very tight in these. Just some bubble situations I'm trying to get a grasp of

Any idea why he's opening so much when he's basically locked up the money?

because he can? power trip? he's losing hardly any equity by doubling up one of you shorties (can most likely still pass into the money) and gaining the lot when he knocks you out. him raising every pot stops you guys from picking up the odd pot here and there from the medium stacks and bringing it back towards parity. im pretty indifferent between raising lots and passing into the money - but then again im no sng expert, especially satellite types. might be interesting to see what tom has to say on this, he played a lot of the step-type tournies and has a great grasp of bubble play

Bubble of a normal sit and go/ MTT I understand why's he's opening so much but half the field get the same money unlike a normal payout structure. I've only ever seen complete nutters constantly opening at this stage- most winning players with his stack have the fold button on perm click
Logged

Ole Ole Ole Ole!
TheChipPrince
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8664



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 11, 2009, 02:23:40 PM »

The most likely answer is, and anyone who has a monster stack in one of these has been guilty of it at one time or another is just boredom, mentally you've chalked this up as a win, you just want to show off and have it over ASAP.
Logged

The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.

RIP- TheChipPrince - $17,165
dousche
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 667



View Profile WWW
« Reply #21 on: March 11, 2009, 02:23:45 PM »


I disagree thats its pointless aggression partly, 95% of the time everyone passes, 19 times out of 20 he adds 300 to his stack, which gives him 20% towards a free shot (5 raises = 1500 stack of the 3 shorties), when he gets caught like this time to take a shot at taking someone out...


i can see where you're coming from but i think stopping the shorties from picking up the blinds is more important than this.


Bubble of a normal sit and go/ MTT I understand why's he's opening so much but half the field get the same money unlike a normal payout structure. I've only ever seen complete nutters constantly opening at this stage- most winning players with his stack have the fold button on perm click

obv he's maxing the % of time he gets itm. i think raising might do that as the medium stacks cant put any pressure on given their stacks and no-one is calling allin. therefore all that should happen is that the other players stay around the same stack while JTM blinds away or one of the shorties runs into another's monster. him raising every hand stops you guys from picking up chips, and even when one of you wakes up with qq+ he's got a 20% shot at winning anyways. the more i think about it the more i like his aggro. although maybe 4.5k is a little short to be getting this active, but not much.
Logged
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 11, 2009, 02:27:42 PM »


obv he's maxing the % of time he gets itm. i think raising might do that as the medium stacks cant put any pressure on given their stacks and no-one is calling allin. therefore all that should happen is that the other players stay around the same stack while JTM blinds away or one of the shorties runs into another's monster. him raising every hand stops you guys from picking up chips, and even when one of you wakes up with qq+ he's got a 20% shot at winning anyways. the more i think about it the more i like his aggro. although maybe 4.5k is a little short to be getting this active, but not much.

Until a noob gets fruity with ATs and he loses the pot and goes from 4.5k to 3k, from 99.96% ITM to 98.96% ITM
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
George2Loose
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15127



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 11, 2009, 02:32:27 PM »


obv he's maxing the % of time he gets itm. i think raising might do that as the medium stacks cant put any pressure on given their stacks and no-one is calling allin. therefore all that should happen is that the other players stay around the same stack while JTM blinds away or one of the shorties runs into another's monster. him raising every hand stops you guys from picking up chips, and even when one of you wakes up with qq+ he's got a 20% shot at winning anyways. the more i think about it the more i like his aggro. although maybe 4.5k is a little short to be getting this active, but not much.

Until a noob gets fruity with ATs and he loses the pot and goes from 4.5k to 3k, from 99.96% ITM to 98.96% ITM

lol it was sooooooooooooted
Logged

Ole Ole Ole Ole!
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 11, 2009, 02:35:51 PM »

 Wink

In all seriousness though, the more harmful scenario to big stacks equity from continual aggression is the noob with a 3k stack who can't fold AA or KK.

Then his stack plummets from 4.5k to 1.5k, his equity shifts from 99.96% ITM to 70% ITM

Trying to claw your ITM up from 99.96 to 99.99 with continued aggression risks the aforementioned scenario.
 
Fuck that imo, just fold.
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
George2Loose
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15127



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: March 11, 2009, 02:36:49 PM »

Anyway the point is- I shoved cos I'm stooopid

In future I'll wait for AJ suited Cheesy
Logged

Ole Ole Ole Ole!
dousche
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 667



View Profile WWW
« Reply #26 on: March 11, 2009, 02:46:55 PM »

Wink

In all seriousness though, the more harmful scenario to big stacks equity from continual aggression is the noob with a 3k stack who can't fold AA or KK.

Then his stack plummets from 4.5k to 1.5k, his equity shifts from 99.96% ITM to 70% ITM

Trying to claw your ITM up from 99.96 to 99.99 with continued aggression risks the aforementioned scenario.
 
Fuck that imo, just fold.

surely he passes to 3k? and yes george, you're a silly silly boy. if you had any kinda skills you woulda won the million!
Logged
gribbo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 279



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: March 11, 2009, 02:51:49 PM »

Fold if you like money!
Logged
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: March 11, 2009, 02:53:39 PM »

Wink

In all seriousness though, the more harmful scenario to big stacks equity from continual aggression is the noob with a 3k stack who can't fold AA or KK.

Then his stack plummets from 4.5k to 1.5k, his equity shifts from 99.96% ITM to 70% ITM

Trying to claw your ITM up from 99.96 to 99.99 with continued aggression risks the aforementioned scenario.
 
Fuck that imo, just fold.

surely he passes to 3k? and yes george, you're a silly silly boy. if you had any kinda skills you woulda won the million!

Probably yes.

You see my general point though. So little to be gained, so much to be lost.
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
I KNOW IT
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3229


I'm the one the right ;)


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: March 11, 2009, 07:26:03 PM »

What sort of stacksize would you recommend you need to go into switchoff mode in a DoN
« Last Edit: March 11, 2009, 07:27:50 PM by I KNOW IT » Logged

You have to expect things of yourself before you can do them." "Heart is what separates the good from the great. '
  


"All money is good, just the quantity makes it better"
      My Dad


"Poker Players and Vultures are alike. They both live off the flesh of the weak"
         Tony Bolto
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.185 seconds with 20 queries.