REVERSE SHEEP QUIZ 26 - THE ONE IN ALL CAPS AND WITH ROBERT'S RULES

[Laxie]

LMAOOOOO @ objecting to yer own answer.

[kinboshi]

Ok, obv no-one agrees with me here, so I'm willing to change it. I suspected I might, but left it as is for the (somewhat unlikely) scenario that someone agreed lol. Give me a few minutes.

OBJECTION! It's perfectly clear what you meant, you can't really override the obvious meaning of your question just because everyone fucked it up. I passed it because it was dead obvious what you meant, but I couldn't correspond the Level numbers

http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/tourStructSnGHold.php

http://www.partypoker.com/tournaments/types_tournament/multi_table/blind_structure.html

Overruled I'm afraid.

To me I was happy that the question made sense and was clear. Evidently however it wasn't as no-one seemed to understand what was asked.

ok I know you won't change it but let's be honest that is a bit farcical eh lol, but keep the peace in case someone throws their rattle out pram

QUESTION: Name one of the first 10 levels, and give me that level's small blind, big blind, and ante. If there is no ante then say 0 for the ante.

ANSWERS: "Name one of the first 10 levels" (OK they failed to see that this bit shouldn't be completely ignored, easily done)

"and" Normally used in an english question to indicate that some other separate piece of info should be supplied (ignored)

"give me that level's small blind, big blind, and ante. If there is no ante then say 0 for the ante." Ok we'll just ignore the first bit and give you that bit instead. If we ALL do this, maybe the fact that we ALL fucked it up will be ignored.

Give me 3 European Countries and their capitals:

Bob: Edinburgh
Mike: Paris
Dave: London

Sorry, you're all wrong, you missed out the obvious first part of the question.

'Waaah! How can we ALL have misunderstood! You're obviously crap at this!!'

Duh, ok then, I can see your point, you're all in fact right in reading the question wrongly and ignoring a crucial part of it.

Farce, should have stuck to your guns.

Obviously he's lacking the spine that was evident earlier.

[kinboshi]

LMAOOOOO @ objecting to yer own answer.

James Patrick Moody was my answer.

[Cf]

And finally:

QUESTION 13 - Give the name (real name, not blonde username) of one of the 10 shrewdies as given in the first post of "SHREWDIES ON TOUR 2009".

SHEEP - Brent Horner - 2 points
Josedinho
Laxie

SHEEP - James Moody - 2 points
kinboshi
TightEnd

SHEEP - Dave Jones - 2 points
cdw1111
The_duke

ACE - Ben Turnstill - 1 point
Shogun112

ACE - Benji Muir - 1 point
Girgy85

FAIL - Richard Offless - 6 points
xxMAIRxx

FAIL - Claire McGregor - 6 points
G1BTW

PASS
RichEO
Stokes

It's James Patrick Moody. 

Or are you accepting part answers now as well?

Just checked the thread. It's listed as simply "James Moody".

[TightEnd]

LMAOOOOO @ objecting to yer own answer.

James Patrick Moody was my answer.

behave or else I will disclose your middle names

[G1BTW]

Ok fuck it, I've had enough of this farce, I'm off, bye.












In keeping with tradition I will in fact be back in 2 minutes to discover that I have unexpectedly done ok and am near the top of the leaderboard again.

[TightEnd]

Ok fuck it, I've had enough of this farce, I'm off, bye.












In keeping with tradition I will in fact be back in 2 minutes to discover that I have unexpectedly done ok and am near the top of the leaderboard again.

you learn well

[Cf]

No final objections before the results?

[Shogun112]

No final objections before the results?

Yeah, minus 10 should be reversed as it is plainy unfair

[kinboshi]

LMAOOOOO @ objecting to yer own answer.

James Patrick Moody was my answer.

behave or else I will disclose your middle names

Only have one, and it's James. 

Richard Quentin Albert Crispin Prew

[kinboshi]

No final objections before the results?

Yeah, minus 10 should be reversed as it is plainy unfair

Yeah, plainy.  Whatever that means.

[Cf]

FINAL SCORES

Girgy85: 15
kinboshi: 17
The_duke: 18
TightEnd: 23
Stokes: 23
Josedinho: 24
Laxie: 26
Shogun112: 29
xxMAIRxx: 29
cdw1111: 30
RichEO: 33
G1BTW: 34

lol @ girgy winning. He only entered because I told him to. I'm pretty sure he has no interest in running one however so I will pass the responsibility of the next (hopefully better) quiz to kinboshi, or whoever he wishes to nominate. I would suggest that The_duke gets first dibs on running the next one due to kinboshi/girgy only having better scores because of the -10 thingy.

It's been an experience! I hope everyone "enjoyed" the quiz. It was perhaps slightly more farcical than it should have been!

[Shogun112]

FINAL SCORES

Girgy85: 15
kinboshi: 17
The_duke: 18
TightEnd: 23
Stokes: 23
Josedinho: 24
Laxie: 26
Shogun112: 29
xxMAIRxx: 29
cdw1111: 30
RichEO: 33
G1BTW: 34

lol @ girgy winning. He only entered because I told him to. I'm pretty sure he has no interest in running one however so I will pass the responsibility of the next (hopefully better) quiz to kinboshi, or whoever he wishes to nominate. I would suggest that The_duke gets first dibs on running the next one due to kinboshi/girgy only having better scores because of the -10 thingy.

It's been an experience! I hope everyone "enjoyed" the quiz. It was perhaps slightly more farcical than it should have been!

Who wants to run the quiz nobody wants to play? erm...

[The_duke]

My problem was that when I read the original rules I didn't take into account the interim rules or even reagrd the special rules or indeed the eventual final rules - but rules are rules however twisted -

well done to the winner I am getting impervious to bad beats

[kinboshi]

My problem was that when I read the original rules I didn't take into account the interim rules or even reagrd the special rules or indeed the eventual final rules - but rules are rules however twisted -

well done to the winner I am getting impervious to bad beats

I read them all on twitter!