|
|
|
bolt pp
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2010, 05:02:58 PM » |
|
Luke is 25 - he drives a Bentley, wears a diamond encrusted watch
looooooool
why not just put: "luke is 25 and a prick"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thetank
|
|
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2010, 05:06:17 PM » |
|
"Despite their talents, both Luke and Andrew admit to having lost vast sums of money from their online activities. Luke’s losses run into millions of dollars."
Where are they getting all these monies?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
titaniumbean
|
|
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2010, 05:09:40 PM » |
|
"Despite their talents, both Luke and Andrew admit to having lost vast sums of money from their online activities. Luke’s losses run into millions of dollars."
Where are they getting all these monies?
OMG I just read this line too HOW MUCH HAVE YOU LOST  omg die people who ask that..... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DaveShoelace
|
|
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2010, 05:14:53 PM » |
|
Im glad a young fella with integrity and talent like Feldman is going on the show representing UK poker on mainstream TV, best thing to happen to UK poker imo, sure doesnt nit roll either, we need more like him. Hi Cos  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thetank
|
|
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2010, 05:15:30 PM » |
|
Two replys for you titanium.
Look into the middle distance for a while before replying "some summer days"
Or put on a Russian accent and say "This is not very correct question. Vinning and losing are binary states. If I is vinning it cannot also be that I is losing."
Latter is my favourite of late. Remember the hand gestures ldo
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
titaniumbean
|
|
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2010, 05:18:39 PM » |
|
Yup second one all day.
How can a gambling charity be so clueless on the idea that you swong rather than having separate winnings and losings.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bolt pp
|
|
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2010, 05:21:55 PM » |
|
Yup second one all day.
How can a gambling charity be so clueless on the idea that you swong rather than having separate winnings and losings.
I imagine they know, DUCY why they pretend not to |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thetank
|
|
« Reply #8 on: February 01, 2010, 05:24:27 PM » |
|
How can a gambling charity be so clueless on the idea that you swong rather than having separate winnings and losings.
Gamcare didn't write the article. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
thetank
|
|
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2010, 05:30:39 PM » |
|
All gamcare have said in that piece as far as I saw...
"You can’t guarantee that you are going to play every poker hand successfully, you can’t guarantee you are going to win over time... so we would say be very cautious of seeing gambling as a way of earning money."
1st point is pretty silly but correct, 2nd point is highly debatable but I wouldn't argue with the conclusion.
If anyone asked me about whether they should treat gambling as some sort of income to depend on I'd also advise them to make such a desicion very cautiously.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 01, 2010, 05:35:38 PM by thetank »
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
bolt pp
|
|
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2010, 05:33:42 PM » |
|
oh ffs what does everyone expect, gamecare, the charity that deals with gambling addiction, to say: "Our official stance with redards to poker(specifically internet poker) is to run good, ship it crucial, one arm in the air bink"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
titaniumbean
|
|
« Reply #11 on: February 01, 2010, 05:41:00 PM » |
|
You cant even guarantee the best hand wins, stupid game |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mondatoo
|
|
« Reply #12 on: February 01, 2010, 09:32:29 PM » |
|
You cant even guarantee the best hand wins, stupid game New game for the next bash ? No postflop action just betting on who has the best hand Obv ego/the comedyness of bluffing means it wouldn't last that long |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DaveShoelace
|
|
« Reply #13 on: February 01, 2010, 09:36:38 PM » |
|
They made Feldman look terrible (or Feldman made Feldman look terrible) and that he needed an intervention. Schwartz came across better than usual I spose.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AndrewT
|
|
« Reply #14 on: February 01, 2010, 10:44:31 PM » |
|
They made Feldman look terrible (or Feldman made Feldman look terrible) and that he needed an intervention. Schwartz came across better than usual I spose.
He could have looked a lot worse if they'd mentioned the collusion stuff. Schwartz has seemed to have developed a bit of a double chin. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author