JJ vs 3 players too nitty?

[paulhouk03]

PokerStars Game #39213700520:  Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2010/02/04 9:13:54 ET
Table 'Sulamitis IV' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: PAMBOS.L ($15.40 in chips)
Seat 2: seanjustin9 ($30.95 in chips)
Seat 3: S41_B ($97.20 in chips)
Seat 4: canalla18 ($65.30 in chips)
Seat 5: Corvette06 ($52.45 in chips)
Seat 6: eticir ($20.20 in chips)
Seat 7: Kop Koffie ($82.50 in chips)
Seat 8: Dombra82 ($16.10 in chips)
canalla18: posts small blind $0.50
Corvette06: posts big blind $1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to S41_B [ ]
eticir: raises $2 to $3
Kop Koffie: calls $3
Dombra82: folds
PAMBOS.L: folds
seanjustin9: raises $27.95 to $30.95 and is all-in
S41_B:?

is it too nitty to fold?
or standard stack off


utg raise
quick call
and a insta shove for 30 bbs

[outragous76]

jam for me

this is eaxctly what the short stackers are looking for when they wake up with any pair A9+ and some suited broadways.

I iso here, only concern is original raiser - any info on him?

[EvilPie]

Original raiser only has 20 bucks so he's not a major concern anyway.

Jam.

[kinboshi]

Player dependent for me, and without any player information you're getting it in.  If you have the right info on the players, it can be a fold - just noticed what Matt said about the stack size of the original raiser - you're not folding here.

[paulhouk03]

jam for me

this is eaxctly what the short stackers are looking for when they wake up with any pair A9+ and some suited broadways.

I iso here, only concern is original raiser - any info on him?

played too many tables to notice anything out line.


not worried about shorties just the utg+1 insta call.


utg is deffo calling imo

utg+1 has been playing pretty solidly and  capable of makeing some moves

[NigDawG]

PokerStars Game #39213700520:  Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2010/02/04 9:13:54 ET
Table 'Sulamitis IV' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: PAMBOS.L ($15.40 in chips)
Seat 2: seanjustin9 ($30.95 in chips)
Seat 3: S41_B ($97.20 in chips)
Seat 4: canalla18 ($65.30 in chips)
Seat 5: Corvette06 ($52.45 in chips)
Seat 6: eticir ($20.20 in chips)
Seat 7: Kop Koffie ($82.50 in chips)
Seat 8: Dombra82 ($16.10 in chips)

this might seem hypocritical cos i only play tourneys but this would tilt the f outta me on a cash table.


oh and i jam

[kinboshi]

jam for me

this is eaxctly what the short stackers are looking for when they wake up with any pair A9+ and some suited broadways.

I iso here, only concern is original raiser - any info on him?

played too many tables to notice anything out line.


not worried about shorties just the utg+1 insta call.


utg+1 is deffo calling imo

utg+1 has been playing pretty solidly and  capable of makeing some moves

If the UTG+1 has a very strong hand, the call is ugly surely?  It could end up with a host of callers after him thinking that there's value to call with their marginal hands - and then what flop do they want to see?

[EvilPie]

jam for me

this is eaxctly what the short stackers are looking for when they wake up with any pair A9+ and some suited broadways.

I iso here, only concern is original raiser - any info on him?

played too many tables to notice anything out line.


not worried about shorties just the utg+1 insta call.


utg+1 is deffo calling imo

utg+1 has been playing pretty solidly and  capable of makeing some moves

So when utg + 1 calls for $3 you think he deffo calls for $79.50 more?

Seems strange but if that's the case then it's a pass as anyone who's definitely calling here is beating the crap out of jacks.

[paulhouk03]

jam for me

this is eaxctly what the short stackers are looking for when they wake up with any pair A9+ and some suited broadways.

I iso here, only concern is original raiser - any info on him?

played too many tables to notice anything out line.


not worried about shorties just the utg+1 insta call.


utg+1 is deffo calling imo

utg+1 has been playing pretty solidly and  capable of makeing some moves

So when utg + 1 calls for $3 you think he deffo calls for $79.50 more?

Seems strange but if that's the case then it's a pass as anyone who's definitely calling here is beating the crap out of jacks.

woops utg is gonna call

mod original post too

[paulhouk03]

are we always gonna be in good shape here?

we are gonna be against
possible over pair,
over cards
the only hands we are crushing are smaller pairs and thats it.

i dont think JJ plays that well 3 way

Also if our shove is called by the utg+1 were basicly drawing to two outs.



can we just call here? I dont think so

[titaniumbean]

How do you know utg will call if we jam or do you mean he'll call if well fold every time?

[titaniumbean]

ok now i've looked at all players stack sizes JUST WHO CARES


JAKKKKKKS BABY


FISH HOOOOOOOKS




25BBBBBBBBBBBB



ITS LIKE A TOURNIE POST FLOP SKILLS FTW

[EvilPie]

are we always gonna be in good shape here?

No. But we are in good shape often enough to make jamming the correct play

we are gonna be against
possible over pair,
over cards
the only hands we are crushing are smaller pairs and thats it.

You could say this about every hand you ever play except aces.

i dont think JJ plays that well 3 way

You should change this opinion.

Also if our shove is called by the utg+1 were basicly drawing to two outs.

Then it's time to bink.

can we just call here? I dont think so

You can if you're inducing the shove or if you're prepared to get it in on any flop. Also if you 100% know that oppo has AK so you know what to do on the flop.

[snoopy1239]

Jam. Evilpie is doing you a favour with the above post.

[Sack it off]

It's a call, then you go and look up game selection.

This isn't a v nice cash table to be on and i'd personally leave and find a new one