blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 21, 2025, 08:57:33 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262358 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  My ESPN Debut
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: My ESPN Debut  (Read 2891 times)
titaniumbean
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10018


Equity means nothing.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: February 17, 2010, 07:05:27 PM »

Yeah well it showed your chips go from like 400,000 then next time we saw was at end of day 3 where you were 3rd in chips with 700.00. As a guy who is into gambling, if you win that race v praz, what would you say your correct odds would of been to win the bracelet?

It's interesting you say Mercier doesn't come across well, I listened to his Pokerroad podcast last night and he just refused to answer any strategy questions at all and kinda came across as a nob.

I'm pretty sure I was watching one of the ept live streams and he came in and commentated for a bit and was v interesting, didn't give away massive secrets but he did discuss the hands well and give much better analysis than you would usually get.
Logged
NigDawG
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1374



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 19, 2010, 01:34:37 PM »

how much value was there in this tourney keith? all the comments i've heard are that its the "hardest tournament of the year" etc etc.

how would you compare it to the aussie millions for example (we played later part of day 1 and i thought that was one of the toughest tables i'd ever played, in my albeit limited experience)

the majority of the wsope footage shown on tv so far has been lol bad with exception of mercier and charder. but yh i understand that these 4hrs of edited tv shouldn't be my sole basis for conclusion lol

oh and mr keys' view, but he had a ridic table draw and somehow luckboxed his way to cashing the first two times... so must be f soft amirite ay ay Cheesy
Logged

Christopher Brammer
The Camel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17074


Under my tree, being a troll.


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 19, 2010, 01:54:41 PM »

how much value was there in this tourney keith? all the comments i've heard are that its the "hardest tournament of the year" etc etc.

how would you compare it to the aussie millions for example (we played later part of day 1 and i thought that was one of the toughest tables i'd ever played, in my albeit limited experience)

the majority of the wsope footage shown on tv so far has been lol bad with exception of mercier and charder. but yh i understand that these 4hrs of edited tv shouldn't be my sole basis for conclusion lol

oh and mr keys' view, but he had a ridic table draw and somehow luckboxed his way to cashing the first two times... so must be f soft amirite ay ay Cheesy

Someone offered to put me in this tournament, there is no way I would play this on my own coin.

I was really really lucky with my table draw. On day 1 I had Howard Lederer on my left who was like an empty seat. I played alot with Steve Zolotow, Tony Cosineau, Devilfish, Men the Master  and Ross Boatman. All of whom are certainly no mugs, but I would 10 times rather play with them than the assortment of scandis we had to face in Australia.

I did face some good players. Charder, Tabbatabi, Negreanu, Akenhead and Bansi, but I had position on all of them so it wasn't a problem.

I suppose I was due a bad draw on the last two tables, and Mercier on my immediate left was the worst. He decimated my stack (none of the hands shown on tv lol).

I think we were very unlucky in Australia, probably the hardest table in the room.

I will definitely play the Aussie Millions again, but only play the wsope again if I win a seat or I find another mug to put me in Wink
Logged

Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists

"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012

"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
pokerfan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5551



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 19, 2010, 01:59:42 PM »

how much value was there in this tourney keith? all the comments i've heard are that its the "hardest tournament of the year" etc etc.

how would you compare it to the aussie millions for example (we played later part of day 1 and i thought that was one of the toughest tables i'd ever played, in my albeit limited experience)

the majority of the wsope footage shown on tv so far has been lol bad with exception of mercier and charder. but yh i understand that these 4hrs of edited tv shouldn't be my sole basis for conclusion lol

oh and mr keys' view, but he had a ridic table draw and somehow luckboxed his way to cashing the first two times... so must be f soft amirite ay ay Cheesy
What`s peeps thoughts on this ? WSOPE or PCA ?
Logged

The Camel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17074


Under my tree, being a troll.


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2010, 02:07:33 PM »

how much value was there in this tourney keith? all the comments i've heard are that its the "hardest tournament of the year" etc etc.

how would you compare it to the aussie millions for example (we played later part of day 1 and i thought that was one of the toughest tables i'd ever played, in my albeit limited experience)

the majority of the wsope footage shown on tv so far has been lol bad with exception of mercier and charder. but yh i understand that these 4hrs of edited tv shouldn't be my sole basis for conclusion lol

oh and mr keys' view, but he had a ridic table draw and somehow luckboxed his way to cashing the first two times... so must be f soft amirite ay ay Cheesy
What`s peeps thoughts on this ? WSOPE or PCA ?

PCA is a mini WSOP. One the best value tournaments of the year imo.
Logged

Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists

"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012

"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6260



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 19, 2010, 02:12:18 PM »

It's a shame TV execs prefer all-in showdowns to more interesting hands that you mention they could have whacked in...
Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
Dry em
Hit Squad
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 964



View Profile WWW
« Reply #21 on: February 23, 2010, 02:56:14 PM »

Just on Mercier, I played quite a bit with him in this and he seemed like a nice guy chatting a bit on the table and in the break. Wasn't talking strategy tho I guess, so can't comment on that bit too much. The other boys seemed to think he was ok too and can play a bit...
Logged

redarmi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5166


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 23, 2010, 04:47:03 PM »

Slight side note but I am not sure that the table draw for the Aussie Millions is totally random.  When I arrived the Friday before I was given my seat draw.  I was one of eight sat winners form Microgaming and lo and behold on my table were three other Microgaming qualifiers and everyone else on the table barring one had won a sat online.  This actually made for a relatively soft table but when I looked aroundn the room the big name pros seemed to be bunched together.....Ivey, Dwan and Billy the croc all on one table with a couple of other iirc.  Based on this I think that your tables might not have been totally representative of the standard in the Aussie Millions.
Logged

MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6260



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 23, 2010, 06:59:46 PM »

Slight side note but I am not sure that the table draw for the Aussie Millions is totally random.  When I arrived the Friday before I was given my seat draw.  I was one of eight sat winners form Microgaming and lo and behold on my table were three other Microgaming qualifiers and everyone else on the table barring one had won a sat online.  This actually made for a relatively soft table but when I looked aroundn the room the big name pros seemed to be bunched together.....Ivey, Dwan and Billy the croc all on one table with a couple of other iirc.  Based on this I think that your tables might not have been totally representative of the standard in the Aussie Millions.

I don't the Billy the croc really counts as a "big name pro" Wink
Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
StuartHopkin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8145


Ocho cinco


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: February 23, 2010, 07:07:11 PM »

Slight side note but I am not sure that the table draw for the Aussie Millions is totally random.  When I arrived the Friday before I was given my seat draw.  I was one of eight sat winners form Microgaming and lo and behold on my table were three other Microgaming qualifiers and everyone else on the table barring one had won a sat online.  This actually made for a relatively soft table but when I looked aroundn the room the big name pros seemed to be bunched together.....Ivey, Dwan and Billy the croc all on one table with a couple of other iirc.  Based on this I think that your tables might not have been totally representative of the standard in the Aussie Millions.

Live pokerz is rigged?
Logged

Only 23 days to go until the Berlin Marathon! Please sponsor me at www.virginmoneygiving.com/StuartHopkin
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 20 queries.