Did a flat call and lost my monies. $3/$6 nlh

[Mitch]

Ok im pretty sure i sholuld just be passing this when i get jammed on by the BB.... Obv im only getting the right price if he has 2 pair or is running some kind of move which is v.unlikely in this spot IMO with this player. Pretty much a set or flush here. Bubbling a EPT steps and couple of S&G's had me in gamble mode


Just interested how people play this once i have flatted pre and got into this spot in a 4 way pot once the flop after original raiser leads...

PokerStars Game #41245972167:  Hold'em No Limit ($3/$6 USD) - 2010/03/16 12:10:24 ET
Table 'Spartacus IV' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: Sparsi ($613.20 in chips)
Seat 2: Mishustik ($1299.25 in chips)
Seat 3: sirkingmitch ($633 in chips)
Seat 4: reDZill4 ($651 in chips)
Seat 6: maza98 ($300 in chips)
Seat 7: Kelisitaan ($606 in chips)
Seat 8: badbluff77 ($137.40 in chips)
Seat 9: thenutspt ($642 in chips)
badbluff77: posts small blind $3
thenutspt: posts big blind $6
ct112: sits out
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to sirkingmitch [ ]
Sparsi: raises $15 to $21
Mishustik: folds
sirkingmitch: calls $21
reDZill4: calls $21
maza98: folds
Kelisitaan: folds
badbluff77: folds
thenutspt: calls $15
*** FLOP *** [ ]
thenutspt: checks
Sparsi: bets $64
sirkingmitch: raises $111 to $175
reDZill4: folds
thenutspt: raises $446 to $621 and is all-in
Sparsi: folds
sirkingmitch: calls $437 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($9) returned to thenutspt
*** TURN *** [ ] []
*** RIVER *** [ ] []
*** SHOW DOWN ***
thenutspt: shows [ ] (a flush, King high)
sirkingmitch: mucks hand
thenutspt collected $1372 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $1375 | Rake $3
Board [ ]
Seat 1: Sparsi folded on the Flop
Seat 2: Mishustik folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: sirkingmitch mucked [  ]
Seat 4: reDZill4 folded on the Flop
Seat 6: maza98 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: Kelisitaan (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: badbluff77 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: thenutspt (big blind) showed [ ] and won ($1372) with a flush, King high

[George2Loose]

Any reason why you took this line pre Mitch?

[Ironside]

unless stacks were a hell of alot deeper i am never folding this hand on flop

[Mitch]

Any reason why you took this line pre Mitch?

Just trying to induce a squeeze really, although tbh i wasnt really concentrating on the game as much as i should have been (one of the TV on, browsing FB, on the phone kinda sessions) and i thought this hand had came up on another table which was far more active. This table was a bit more passive and was more likely to pick up more flat callers once i had called from early position rather than a squeeze, so ideally i wouldnt have flatted here.

[titaniumbean]

Cawl and hit a club?

[Mitch]

Cawl and hit a club?

I dont run like that anymore.....ah the good old days 

Flat the flop. Then, depending what happens, you may end up folding or shoving depending on your read. As played, guess you gotta call.

Ok, i flat and then BB makes it ~$250. What you doing then if A) original raiser shoves  B) he passes

[AlexMartin]

unless stacks were a hell of alot deeper i am never folding this hand on flop

its 4way to the flop in a single raised pot. If someone else wants to play for stacks here we will usually be up against a made flush or a set/ very rarely some KcX hand. We have the nfd blocked. mitch, play 6max m8, your game will be more suited imo.

as played i gues u have to get it in, but personally i think raising will let him play his entire range close to perfectly unless u have some maniacal image.

[GreekStein]

Definitely what Alexei Martino just said in terms of playing 6 max. You are 100x more suited to 6 max than gay full ring

[George2Loose]

I also read somewhere the 2/4 and 3/6 is probably the toughest to beat on stars. You don't get as many fish as you get at 5/10 or 50/1 1/2. Just a load of cash sharks. Anyone who plays cash confirm/deny this?

[marcro]

I also read somewhere the 2/4 and 3/6 is probably the toughest to beat on stars. You don't get as many fish as you get at 5/10 or 50/1 1/2. Just a load of cash sharks. Anyone who plays cash confirm/deny this?

I have not heard this but have seen many cases on PTR where people are winners at 5/10 but losers at 2/4.

[Mitch]

I also read somewhere the 2/4 and 3/6 is probably the toughest to beat on stars. You don't get as many fish as you get at 5/10 or 50/1 1/2. Just a load of cash sharks. Anyone who plays cash confirm/deny this?

Yeah not too many people making too many mistakes, im just being lazy because i get on with the software on stars. Not using HUD either which is obv important at those levels.

Think im gonna give 6max a go for a bit or give a few other sites a blast.

[AlexMartin]

I also read somewhere the 2/4 and 3/6 is probably the toughest to beat on stars. You don't get as many fish as you get at 5/10 or 50/1 1/2. Just a load of cash sharks. Anyone who plays cash confirm/deny this?

Yeah not too many people making too many mistakes, im just being lazy because i get on with the software on stars. Not using HUD either which is obv important at those levels.

Think im gonna give 6max a go for a bit or give a few other sites a blast.

you'll be the fish then.........

srsly, unless ur playing in a very small player pool, not using a hud is killing ur winrate/exacerrbating your lossrate to a ridic extent.