What is happening here?!

[turny]

it was a fairly grim post tbf - wasnt necessary and he should know better

is chip rich banned or not - he hasnt been around either?

yes rooks you should no better lol he didnt post the stuff hes banned for so how can he know better?

I'm sure the decision wasn't taken lightly. As Ironside said the ip addresses matched. If he wants to appeal 'm sure he will, you can give him some pointers..... ;-)

nice dig tracey meoow ;-)ng

thats only irons word im afraid, i know differently, wouldnt be the first time iron has claimed ben's done or said something and then been wrong

[sovietsong]

ban op please

[Ironside]

it was a fairly grim post tbf - wasnt necessary and he should know better

is chip rich banned or not - he hasnt been around either?

yes rooks you should no better lol he didnt post the stuff hes banned for so how can he know better?

I'm sure the decision wasn't taken lightly. As Ironside said the ip addresses matched. If he wants to appeal 'm sure he will, you can give him some pointers..... ;-)

nice dig tracey meoow ;-)ng

ithats only irons word im afraid, i know differently, wouldnt be the first time iron has claimed ben's done or said something and then been wro

the trace on the ips was done on tuesday by the mod team when the mods got back from the weekends updates, on tuesday i was in hospital for an operation i had on wednessday and only had limited access on my phone so took no part into the investigation or the bans. i have every faith in the mod team and have read the many post on the mods board on this issue and believe the evidance holds up

i could look into the evidance myself but i feel that the mod team as a whole are much better at this than me on my own so cant see me bringing up anything new.

as ben has already emailed me accusing me of having a problem with him (which i dont) i am unsure if i would even want to spend the next few hours looking through the evidance (which is pretty strong) or go to my bed and recoup as i was planning too

[Dingdell]

it was a fairly grim post tbf - wasnt necessary and he should know better

is chip rich banned or not - he hasnt been around either?

yes rooks you should no better lol he didnt post the stuff hes banned for so how can he know better?

I'm sure the decision wasn't taken lightly. As Ironside said the ip addresses matched. If he wants to appeal 'm sure he will, you can give him some pointers..... ;-)

nice dig tracey meoow ;-)ng

thats only irons word im afraid, i know differently, wouldnt be the first time iron has claimed ben's done or said something and then been wrong

Sigh - my post wasn't meant to be a dig - if I want to say something about you I will say it straight out. I just choose not to in most circumstances, I prefer to keep the peace.

My post was meant to remind you that despite your ban you managed to deal with it to your satisfaction, in other words if Rookie wants to come back I'm sure he will be in touch, make a good case for it, and you can help him because you've done it before.

No point reinventing the wheel imo, use your experience to help him if you want to, and if he wants to come back.

[The Camel]

Who is shieldsy?

[turny]

it was a fairly grim post tbf - wasnt necessary and he should know better

is chip rich banned or not - he hasnt been around either?

yes rooks you should no better lol he didnt post the stuff hes banned for so how can he know better?

I'm sure the decision wasn't taken lightly. As Ironside said the ip addresses matched. If he wants to appeal 'm sure he will, you can give him some pointers..... ;-)

nice dig tracey meoow ;-)ng

ithats only irons word im afraid, i know differently, wouldnt be the first time iron has claimed ben's done or said something and then been wro

the trace on the ips was done on tuesday by the mod team when the mods got back from the weekends updates, on tuesday i was in hospital for an operation i had on wednessday and only had limited access on my phone so took no part into the investigation or the bans. i have every faith in the mod team and have read the many post on the mods board on this issue and believe the evidance holds up

i could look into the evidance myself but i feel that the mod team as a whole are much better at this than me on my own so cant see me bringing up anything new.

as ben has already emailed me accusing me of having a problem with him (which i dont) i am unsure if i would even want to spend the next few hours looking through the evidance (which is pretty strong) or go to my bed and recoup as i was planning too

thats right personal vendetta over evidence works every time ;-)

[Laxie]

I've been quietly thinking it'd blow over, the Lads will be back and that's the end of it, but it takes everyone working together for that to happen.  Would be nice if everyone just gave it a chance to blow over and let the peeps involved get it sorted in time.  Dragging it on only keeps it raw for both sides and sorting it takes more time.  

That's just my 2 cents, but what do I know?

[turny]

it was a fairly grim post tbf - wasnt necessary and he should know better

is chip rich banned or not - he hasnt been around either?

yes rooks you should no better lol he didnt post the stuff hes banned for so how can he know better?

I'm sure the decision wasn't taken lightly. As Ironside said the ip addresses matched. If he wants to appeal 'm sure he will, you can give him some pointers..... ;-)

nice dig tracey meoow ;-)ng

thats only irons word im afraid, i know differently, wouldnt be the first time iron has claimed ben's done or said something and then been wrong

Sigh - my post wasn't meant to be a dig - if I want to say something about you I will say it straight out. I just choose not to in most circumstances, I prefer to keep the peace.

My post was meant to remind you that despite your ban you managed to deal with it to your satisfaction, in other words if Rookie wants to come back I'm sure he will be in touch, make a good case for it, and you can help him because you've done it before.

No point reinventing the wheel imo, use your experience to help him if you want to, and if he wants to come back.

as far as im aware at the moment he doesnt but that doesnt mean he should be banned for something het done hasn

[turny]

I've been quietly thinking it'd blow over, the Lads will be back and that's the end of it, but it takes everyone working together for that to happen.  Would be nice if everyone just gave it a chance to blow over and let the peeps involved get it sorted in time.  Dragging it on only keeps it raw for both sides and sorting it takes more time.  

That's just my 2 cents, but what do I know?

its a life ban laxie how does that blow over? how is that working together? ben hsnt even been asked to explain himself or give his side

[The Camel]

I've been quietly thinking it'd blow over, the Lads will be back and that's the end of it, but it takes everyone working together for that to happen.  Would be nice if everyone just gave it a chance to blow over and let the peeps involved get it sorted in time.  Dragging it on only keeps it raw for both sides and sorting it takes more time.  

That's just my 2 cents, but what do I know?

How difficult is it for an adult to refrain from posting something which will upset or offend another user of an internet poker forum?

And who is Shieldsy?

[turny]

Who is shieldsy?

a fat mate of mine and rookies who talks and posts shit when hes drunk lol

[turny]

I've been quietly thinking it'd blow over, the Lads will be back and that's the end of it, but it takes everyone working together for that to happen.  Would be nice if everyone just gave it a chance to blow over and let the peeps involved get it sorted in time.  Dragging it on only keeps it raw for both sides and sorting it takes more time.  

That's just my 2 cents, but what do I know?

How difficult is it for an adult to refrain from posting something which will upset or offend another user of an internet poker forum?

And who is Shieldsy?

imsure you may have said or posted something in the past that may have upset someone surely? especially here on blonde where sensitivity is at its highest ;-)

[Acidmouse]

if its the post i saw then it was disgusting and happily i didn't open while at work or that is me in trouble. Whoever did it wants a slap.

[The Camel]

I've been quietly thinking it'd blow over, the Lads will be back and that's the end of it, but it takes everyone working together for that to happen.  Would be nice if everyone just gave it a chance to blow over and let the peeps involved get it sorted in time.  Dragging it on only keeps it raw for both sides and sorting it takes more time.  

That's just my 2 cents, but what do I know?

How difficult is it for an adult to refrain from posting something which will upset or offend another user of an internet poker forum?

And who is Shieldsy?

imsure you may have said or posted something in the past that may have upset someone surely? especially here on blonde where sensitivity is at its highest ;-)

Doubt it very much

[Dingdell]

If Rookie wants to appeal he will.

I am happy for Blonde mods to moderate this forum, and I think they do it well. If a mistake is made they are capable of sorting it out. I back the mods wholeheartedly.