poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 24, 2025, 06:30:38 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262399
Posts in
66606
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
Theoretical WSOP Question
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
3
4
[
5
]
6
Author
Topic: Theoretical WSOP Question (Read 13112 times)
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #60 on:
June 09, 2010, 10:14:49 PM »
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 10:10:17 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 09:31:34 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 05:41:02 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 04:24:53 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 02:35:17 PM
The guy has strolled over and jammed first hand. Why do we call light right now? He could go on to jam every hand and then we can readjust our calling range to a developing trend. Assigning a range first hand is based on no factual info of how villain is going to play this game? Calling all-in 1st hand on a perception of an image doesn't seem so smart. This wont be our only opportunity to snap if it carries on. Yeah, a quick easy double-up is useful, so villain can push a decent 1st hand for that very reason, and get the queue of heroes behind offering him that very thing. This may be true or it may not be true, but I wouldn't know cos he's just sat down.
this is a daft post as we know the villain and we know his M.O. If he wakes up at the top of his range we jsut have to bink - like he is trying to do -
You really have abs no idea what's going on in Tom Dwan's mind when he sits down Guy, you really don't. Guessing at something doesn't make it a truth. You know villain? How well do you know villain? You've seen him play on the telly? Passing up K high or 2-2 here isn't letting a golden opportunity slip through your fingers. Maybe you wanna try trading some balls for some brains. If I was Dwan I reckon I'd be loving moving from table to table jamming strength and getting snapped off by jokers who "know me".
erm - ( as an aside to this example, but a fact) he buys into a 10k and blinds away not playing a hand whilst deep in another tourney
back to eg
he has min £10m in props to win a bracelet
he aint gonna sit here and grind the 1500 when he is deep in a 10k - im pretty sure that his OPEN SHIPPING range is wide enough that my original raneg would be +ev agaisnt his
Therefore im going with it given all of the dynamics that are KNOWNS
True, it's possible he wants to just take a spin here. It's also possible he wants to sit down and play some good poker in this world series. Shipping a hand is good poker for Dwann. He prob lols at how good. Out of 3k people there will be so many hero donkeys wanting to take a shot...he needn't piss about playing the streets right, why waste of time? I'd be gutted if I had position on Dwann for the hour and he flipped A-K here. Truly and properly mugged off mate. How many tournaments are we playing again to make that worth the 51.2% edge?
so if the hands were turned over and he had 22 and you have AKs you wouldnt call?
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
MANTIS01
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6734
What kind of fuckery is this?
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #61 on:
June 09, 2010, 10:19:26 PM »
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 10:14:49 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 10:10:17 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 09:31:34 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 05:41:02 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 04:24:53 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 02:35:17 PM
The guy has strolled over and jammed first hand. Why do we call light right now? He could go on to jam every hand and then we can readjust our calling range to a developing trend. Assigning a range first hand is based on no factual info of how villain is going to play this game? Calling all-in 1st hand on a perception of an image doesn't seem so smart. This wont be our only opportunity to snap if it carries on. Yeah, a quick easy double-up is useful, so villain can push a decent 1st hand for that very reason, and get the queue of heroes behind offering him that very thing. This may be true or it may not be true, but I wouldn't know cos he's just sat down.
this is a daft post as we know the villain and we know his M.O. If he wakes up at the top of his range we jsut have to bink - like he is trying to do -
You really have abs no idea what's going on in Tom Dwan's mind when he sits down Guy, you really don't. Guessing at something doesn't make it a truth. You know villain? How well do you know villain? You've seen him play on the telly? Passing up K high or 2-2 here isn't letting a golden opportunity slip through your fingers. Maybe you wanna try trading some balls for some brains. If I was Dwan I reckon I'd be loving moving from table to table jamming strength and getting snapped off by jokers who "know me".
erm - ( as an aside to this example, but a fact) he buys into a 10k and blinds away not playing a hand whilst deep in another tourney
back to eg
he has min £10m in props to win a bracelet
he aint gonna sit here and grind the 1500 when he is deep in a 10k - im pretty sure that his OPEN SHIPPING range is wide enough that my original raneg would be +ev agaisnt his
Therefore im going with it given all of the dynamics that are KNOWNS
True, it's possible he wants to just take a spin here. It's also possible he wants to sit down and play some good poker in this world series. Shipping a hand is good poker for Dwann. He prob lols at how good. Out of 3k people there will be so many hero donkeys wanting to take a shot...he needn't piss about playing the streets right, why waste of time? I'd be gutted if I had position on Dwann for the hour and he flipped A-K here. Truly and properly mugged off mate. How many tournaments are we playing again to make that worth the 51.2% edge?
so if the hands were turned over and he had 22 and you have AKs you wouldnt call?
I'd snap with AKs. Because I wouldn't look like a div when I flipped my cards.
Logged
Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"
Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"
Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"
taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #62 on:
June 09, 2010, 10:31:07 PM »
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 10:19:26 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 10:14:49 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 10:10:17 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 09:31:34 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 05:41:02 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 04:24:53 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 02:35:17 PM
The guy has strolled over and jammed first hand. Why do we call light right now? He could go on to jam every hand and then we can readjust our calling range to a developing trend. Assigning a range first hand is based on no factual info of how villain is going to play this game? Calling all-in 1st hand on a perception of an image doesn't seem so smart. This wont be our only opportunity to snap if it carries on. Yeah, a quick easy double-up is useful, so villain can push a decent 1st hand for that very reason, and get the queue of heroes behind offering him that very thing. This may be true or it may not be true, but I wouldn't know cos he's just sat down.
this is a daft post as we know the villain and we know his M.O. If he wakes up at the top of his range we jsut have to bink - like he is trying to do -
You really have abs no idea what's going on in Tom Dwan's mind when he sits down Guy, you really don't. Guessing at something doesn't make it a truth. You know villain? How well do you know villain? You've seen him play on the telly? Passing up K high or 2-2 here isn't letting a golden opportunity slip through your fingers. Maybe you wanna try trading some balls for some brains. If I was Dwan I reckon I'd be loving moving from table to table jamming strength and getting snapped off by jokers who "know me".
erm - ( as an aside to this example, but a fact) he buys into a 10k and blinds away not playing a hand whilst deep in another tourney
back to eg
he has min £10m in props to win a bracelet
he aint gonna sit here and grind the 1500 when he is deep in a 10k - im pretty sure that his OPEN SHIPPING range is wide enough that my original raneg would be +ev agaisnt his
Therefore im going with it given all of the dynamics that are KNOWNS
True, it's possible he wants to just take a spin here. It's also possible he wants to sit down and play some good poker in this world series. Shipping a hand is good poker for Dwann. He prob lols at how good. Out of 3k people there will be so many hero donkeys wanting to take a shot...he needn't piss about playing the streets right, why waste of time? I'd be gutted if I had position on Dwann for the hour and he flipped A-K here. Truly and properly mugged off mate. How many tournaments are we playing again to make that worth the 51.2% edge?
so if the hands were turned over and he had 22 and you have AKs you wouldnt call?
I'd snap with AKs. Because I wouldn't look like a div when I flipped my cards.
wow - just wow
you are concerned about how you look when considering the equity of a poker decission
so if you knew he had 22 you wouldntnt call KQs because you might 'bad' in other players eyes?
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
MANTIS01
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6734
What kind of fuckery is this?
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #63 on:
June 09, 2010, 11:28:51 PM »
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 10:31:07 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 10:19:26 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 10:14:49 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 10:10:17 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 09:31:34 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 05:41:02 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 04:24:53 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 02:35:17 PM
The guy has strolled over and jammed first hand. Why do we call light right now? He could go on to jam every hand and then we can readjust our calling range to a developing trend. Assigning a range first hand is based on no factual info of how villain is going to play this game? Calling all-in 1st hand on a perception of an image doesn't seem so smart. This wont be our only opportunity to snap if it carries on. Yeah, a quick easy double-up is useful, so villain can push a decent 1st hand for that very reason, and get the queue of heroes behind offering him that very thing. This may be true or it may not be true, but I wouldn't know cos he's just sat down.
this is a daft post as we know the villain and we know his M.O. If he wakes up at the top of his range we jsut have to bink - like he is trying to do -
You really have abs no idea what's going on in Tom Dwan's mind when he sits down Guy, you really don't. Guessing at something doesn't make it a truth. You know villain? How well do you know villain? You've seen him play on the telly? Passing up K high or 2-2 here isn't letting a golden opportunity slip through your fingers. Maybe you wanna try trading some balls for some brains. If I was Dwan I reckon I'd be loving moving from table to table jamming strength and getting snapped off by jokers who "know me".
erm - ( as an aside to this example, but a fact) he buys into a 10k and blinds away not playing a hand whilst deep in another tourney
back to eg
he has min £10m in props to win a bracelet
he aint gonna sit here and grind the 1500 when he is deep in a 10k - im pretty sure that his OPEN SHIPPING range is wide enough that my original raneg would be +ev agaisnt his
Therefore im going with it given all of the dynamics that are KNOWNS
True, it's possible he wants to just take a spin here. It's also possible he wants to sit down and play some good poker in this world series. Shipping a hand is good poker for Dwann. He prob lols at how good. Out of 3k people there will be so many hero donkeys wanting to take a shot...he needn't piss about playing the streets right, why waste of time? I'd be gutted if I had position on Dwann for the hour and he flipped A-K here. Truly and properly mugged off mate. How many tournaments are we playing again to make that worth the 51.2% edge?
so if the hands were turned over and he had 22 and you have AKs you wouldnt call?
I'd snap with AKs. Because I wouldn't look like a div when I flipped my cards.
wow - just wow
you are concerned about how you look when considering the equity of a poker decission
so if you knew he had 22 you wouldntnt call KQs because you might 'bad' in other players eyes?
If I called light I'd look like a div because my decision would be a shit one. You think Dwan hasn't calculated his equity in pushing before now? I'm concerned about making bad decisions. But I'd look at myself and think div for making one. It's relatively obvious I don't care how my poker looks in other people's eyes isn't it?? And A-ks plays better than 2-2 in my calculated opinion.
Logged
Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"
Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"
Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"
taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #64 on:
June 09, 2010, 11:32:12 PM »
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 11:28:51 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 10:31:07 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 10:19:26 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 10:14:49 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 10:10:17 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 09:31:34 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 05:41:02 PM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 04:24:53 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 02:35:17 PM
The guy has strolled over and jammed first hand. Why do we call light right now? He could go on to jam every hand and then we can readjust our calling range to a developing trend. Assigning a range first hand is based on no factual info of how villain is going to play this game? Calling all-in 1st hand on a perception of an image doesn't seem so smart. This wont be our only opportunity to snap if it carries on. Yeah, a quick easy double-up is useful, so villain can push a decent 1st hand for that very reason, and get the queue of heroes behind offering him that very thing. This may be true or it may not be true, but I wouldn't know cos he's just sat down.
this is a daft post as we know the villain and we know his M.O. If he wakes up at the top of his range we jsut have to bink - like he is trying to do -
You really have abs no idea what's going on in Tom Dwan's mind when he sits down Guy, you really don't. Guessing at something doesn't make it a truth. You know villain? How well do you know villain? You've seen him play on the telly? Passing up K high or 2-2 here isn't letting a golden opportunity slip through your fingers. Maybe you wanna try trading some balls for some brains. If I was Dwan I reckon I'd be loving moving from table to table jamming strength and getting snapped off by jokers who "know me".
erm - ( as an aside to this example, but a fact) he buys into a 10k and blinds away not playing a hand whilst deep in another tourney
back to eg
he has min £10m in props to win a bracelet
he aint gonna sit here and grind the 1500 when he is deep in a 10k - im pretty sure that his OPEN SHIPPING range is wide enough that my original raneg would be +ev agaisnt his
Therefore im going with it given all of the dynamics that are KNOWNS
True, it's possible he wants to just take a spin here. It's also possible he wants to sit down and play some good poker in this world series. Shipping a hand is good poker for Dwann. He prob lols at how good. Out of 3k people there will be so many hero donkeys wanting to take a shot...he needn't piss about playing the streets right, why waste of time? I'd be gutted if I had position on Dwann for the hour and he flipped A-K here. Truly and properly mugged off mate. How many tournaments are we playing again to make that worth the 51.2% edge?
so if the hands were turned over and he had 22 and you have AKs you wouldnt call?
I'd snap with AKs. Because I wouldn't look like a div when I flipped my cards.
wow - just wow
you are concerned about how you look when considering the equity of a poker decission
so if you knew he had 22 you wouldntnt call KQs because you might 'bad' in other players eyes?
If I called light I'd look like a div because my decision would be a shit one. You think Dwan hasn't calculated his equity in pushing before now? I'm concerned about making bad decisions. But I'd look at myself and think div for making one. It's relatively obvious I don't care how my poker looks in other people's eyes isn't it?? And A-ks plays better than 2-2 in my calculated opinion.
answer the question - cause im pretty sure that KQs plays pretty similar to AK ( against 22)but yet you think its a different decission?
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #65 on:
June 09, 2010, 11:33:51 PM »
and what if you had 77 and you knew he had JTo?
you see where im going?
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
MANTIS01
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6734
What kind of fuckery is this?
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #66 on:
June 09, 2010, 11:47:50 PM »
I'd prob call with K-Qs if I knew he had 2-2. But I don't know he has 2-2. I do know he'd have a lot of A-x hands thou.
Logged
Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"
Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"
Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"
taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17075
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #67 on:
June 09, 2010, 11:48:25 PM »
Aha for some reason I thought I was the bb in this hand.
My bad.
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #68 on:
June 09, 2010, 11:50:33 PM »
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 11:47:50 PM
I'd prob call with K-Qs if I knew he had 2-2. But I don't know he has 2-2. I do know he'd have a lot of A-x hands thou.
so he has a lot of Ax hands? really? but you dont call 99 TT JJ? - you must be good because you are passing up some edge!
lets cut to the chase - what do you think his range might be?
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #69 on:
June 10, 2010, 01:40:56 AM »
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 11:50:33 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 11:47:50 PM
I'd prob call with K-Qs if I knew he had 2-2. But I don't know he has 2-2. I do know he'd have a lot of A-x hands thou.
so he has a lot of Ax hands? really? but you dont call 99 TT JJ? - you must be good because you are passing up some edge!
lets cut to the chase - what do you think his range might be?
Very tight. He knows loads of people are gonna make donkey calls against him with 22 and the like, esp on the first hand he plays.
Logged
Blue text
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17075
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #70 on:
June 10, 2010, 01:47:21 AM »
This is how seriously Durr is taking the small events:
http://www.pokernews.com/live-reporting/2010-wsop/event-18/post.146774.htm
LOL @ just calling with KK+ and AK.
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
pleno1
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 18912
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #71 on:
June 10, 2010, 02:01:24 AM »
Quote from: Cf on June 10, 2010, 01:40:56 AM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 11:50:33 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 11:47:50 PM
I'd prob call with K-Qs if I knew he had 2-2. But I don't know he has 2-2. I do know he'd have a lot of A-x hands thou.
so he has a lot of Ax hands? really? but you dont call 99 TT JJ? - you must be good because you are passing up some edge!
lets cut to the chase - what do you think his range might be?
Very tight. He knows loads of people are gonna make donkey calls against him with 22 and the like, esp on the first hand he plays.
these people are satalite winners and like old tight nitty men.
Logged
Quote from: TightEnd on December 16, 2013, 12:59:59 AM
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
nirvana
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7809
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #72 on:
June 10, 2010, 08:27:19 AM »
Do we know how Tom walked up to the table, did he swagger or was his gait more skater/slacker ?
Logged
sola virtus nobilitat
MANTIS01
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6734
What kind of fuckery is this?
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #73 on:
June 10, 2010, 09:58:43 AM »
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 11:50:33 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 11:47:50 PM
I'd prob call with K-Qs if I knew he had 2-2. But I don't know he has 2-2. I do know he'd have a lot of A-x hands thou.
so he has a lot of Ax hands? really? but you dont call 99 TT JJ? - you must be good because you are passing up some edge!
lets cut to the chase - what do you think his range might be?
My own calling range would be TT+ A-K. Like I said, I couldn't rightly figure a range for villain because he's just sat down. And because I have no reliable range I couldn't make reliable calculations. So it's unlikely I'd get my knickers in a twist ref edge %'s in this hand. Once again you address these remarks to me and not Flushy.
Logged
Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"
Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"
Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"
taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Theoretical WSOP Question
«
Reply #74 on:
June 10, 2010, 11:37:53 AM »
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 10, 2010, 09:58:43 AM
Quote from: outragous76 on June 09, 2010, 11:50:33 PM
Quote from: MANTIS01 on June 09, 2010, 11:47:50 PM
I'd prob call with K-Qs if I knew he had 2-2. But I don't know he has 2-2. I do know he'd have a lot of A-x hands thou.
so he has a lot of Ax hands? really? but you dont call 99 TT JJ? - you must be good because you are passing up some edge!
lets cut to the chase - what do you think his range might be?
My own calling range would be TT+ A-K. Like I said, I couldn't rightly figure a range for villain because he's just sat down. And because I have no reliable range I couldn't make reliable calculations. So it's unlikely I'd get my knickers in a twist ref edge %'s in this hand. Once again you address these remarks to me and not Flushy.
well we have been having a "conversation" but my points are applicable to all.
The point is you do have some information, from media reporting, knowing dwan, having the specific set up of teh OP, so the fact that you think that you dont shows that you are limiting your own ability to make well informed decissions (i think the hand quote by Camel clearly shows that the people who think he is shipping very wide are probably correct in this instance).
I am also pretty sure that flushy doesnt make poker decission on how he "might look like a div", so you shouldnt include him within your specific reasoning, until he confirms that he would do this!
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
Pages:
1
2
3
4
[
5
]
6
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...