blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 20, 2025, 11:26:25 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262335 Posts in 66605 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  The Lounge
| | |-+  Lumix DMC-ZX3 Camera?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Lumix DMC-ZX3 Camera?  (Read 6203 times)
Woodsey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15837



View Profile
« on: June 27, 2010, 09:30:09 PM »

Anyone got this exact model? If so any comments please?

http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/Products/LUMIX+Digital+Cameras/Stylish+Compact/DMC-ZX3/Overview/3378867/index.html

Just bought Fuji's latest model which was a bag of shit and am offloading it, don't want to be disappointed again. I know the Lumix's superzoom range is really high quality, just want to know if this translates over to the smaller range.

Also if anyone knows where to find out impartial reviews I would be grateful, am pissed off with paid magazine professionals writing good reviews because they are paid to do it.
Logged
lazaroonie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3108


Your a dead man Den Watts !!


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2010, 10:33:19 PM »

think panasonic are right up at the top of the compact range - lenses by leica make them first rate. the screens on the back are also really good.
Logged

The blog of my friend Colchester Kev
http://colchesterkev.wordpress.com/
Woodsey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15837



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2010, 10:40:19 PM »

think panasonic are right up at the top of the compact range - lenses by leica make them first rate. the screens on the back are also really good.

Yeah I know the super zoom range is awesome, just want to know if this translates across to their smaller sisters.........
Logged
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47393



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2010, 10:45:56 PM »

Why that model Andrew? It's a fantasic camera, but have a look at this one....


http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2010/02/26/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-TZ10/p1

It will make your SLR obsolete.
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
Woodsey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15837



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2010, 10:59:18 PM »

Why that model Andrew? It's a fantasic camera, but have a look at this one....


http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2010/02/26/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-TZ10/p1

It will make your SLR obsolete.

Too big Tom otherwise I would, I specifically want a smaller one. I know that range is the nuts, I just want to know if the quality translates to the smaller range minus the zoom........
« Last Edit: June 27, 2010, 11:01:49 PM by Woodsey » Logged
MPOWER
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1696



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2010, 11:07:23 PM »

I have owned a Panasonic FZ 50 for about 3 Years and it is fantastic I also have a  DMC FS42 and never had a problem with either.

Regards

M
Logged
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47393



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: June 27, 2010, 11:10:33 PM »

Why that model Andrew? It's a fantasic camera, but have a look at this one....


http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2010/02/26/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-TZ10/p1

It will make your SLR obsolete.

Too big Tom otherwise I would, I specifically want a smaller one. I know that range is the nuts, I just want to know if the quality translates to the smaller range minus the zoom........

Just google Lumix DMC-ZX3 and look for the user reviews.
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
Woodsey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15837



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 27, 2010, 11:14:46 PM »

Why that model Andrew? It's a fantasic camera, but have a look at this one....


http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2010/02/26/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-TZ10/p1

It will make your SLR obsolete.

Too big Tom otherwise I would, I specifically want a smaller one. I know that range is the nuts, I just want to know if the quality translates to the smaller range minus the zoom........

Just google Lumix DMC-ZX3 and look for the user reviews.

LOL already tried that with a camera I bought a few weeks ago and its crap. Too many of them aren't written by users but are sly promotions, I don't know which are/aren't unfortunately, hey ho...........
Logged
rex008
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1679



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: June 27, 2010, 11:19:43 PM »

I've got a ZX1, which is older model but very similar to the ZX3 but slightly lower res. Might even have the same body, pics look identical. Very nice, like it a lot. I've had 2 canons previously, but the combination of size, a 8x zoom lens, and 25mm equivalent wide angle sold the Panasonic to me. Picture quality is very good, got lots of nice features. Does all I need it to do. But I mainly bought it because it easily fits in a pocket, tbh!
Logged

"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." - Douglas Adams
The secret to a happy life - "Never pass up a chance to have sex or appear on television." - Gore Vidal
Woodsey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15837



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 27, 2010, 11:23:21 PM »

I've got a ZX1, which is older model but very similar to the ZX3 but slightly lower res. Might even have the same body, pics look identical. Very nice, like it a lot. I've had 2 canons previously, but the combination of size, a 8x zoom lens, and 25mm equivalent wide angle sold the Panasonic to me. Picture quality is very good, got lots of nice features. Does all I need it to do. But I mainly bought it because it easily fits in a pocket, tbh!

OK cheers mate
Logged
TightPaulFolds
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 898


Not a moderator in any fashion whatsoever


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 28, 2010, 04:40:36 PM »

Why that model Andrew? It's a fantasic camera, but have a look at this one....


http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2010/02/26/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-TZ10/p1

It will make your SLR obsolete.

GPS in a camera wtf.

Wondering if it makes an SLR obsolete, maybe. Looks like quite a limited Aperture range.

Please can we have a blonde weekly photo comp cos I am a beginner and need tipz ty.
Logged
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47393



View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: June 28, 2010, 05:03:55 PM »

I have a Lumix FZ7. It's a great camera but I take all of my pics on my phone cam simply because it's always with me.


Today's phone cam effort:

1/64s
f/2.8
iso100

 Click to see full-size image.
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47393



View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: June 28, 2010, 05:08:17 PM »

Not outstanding, but miles better than no picture at all.


 Click to see full-size image.
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47393



View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: June 28, 2010, 05:14:10 PM »

From my walk yesterday. A photo can't do it justice though.


 Click to see full-size image.


Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
TightPaulFolds
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 898


Not a moderator in any fashion whatsoever


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 28, 2010, 05:14:22 PM »

Nice! Miles better than my phone cam, for a smartphone its results are unacceptable really.

Got this pic last week, put 3 exposures together with photomatix but the hills are still black!

 Click to see full-size image.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.067 seconds with 20 queries.