blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 19, 2025, 09:11:04 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262325 Posts in 66605 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Epic Prop Bet!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Epic Prop Bet!  (Read 10234 times)
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« on: October 12, 2010, 03:32:57 AM »

A friend of mine, no account here, but well regarded in the poker scene live and online is proposing a pretty sick prop bet...

The bet, at even money to play 100,000 hands of 6max NLHE cash in a 7 day period - (168hours) at minimum stake $2/$4.
AND...be +$1 minimum at EV!

He's Matthew Frankland.

http://www.pokertableratings.com/stars-player-search/matfrankland
http://www.pokertableratings.com/fulltilt-player-search/matfrankland
http://pokerdb.thehendonmob.com/player.php?a=r&n=134374

Standard T+C's.

Only He can play on the account
Can play/sleep/eat w/e he wants
webcam feed set up
Poker tracker graphs as proof, + one person to moderate.
If he doesnt play 100,000 at least he looses.
If his EV line isnt plus MINIMUM $1, he looses.

Pretty sure he's open to any changes in T+Cs if they reasonable.

Thought peoples - betting at EVEN money.

If you wanted to bet, we'd probs need to escrow the monies with someone everyone trusts, as Franky doesn't post... I'd happily do it but Im one of Franky's best mates and he takes action in me in a lot of my games so would be a bit wierd really.

Logged

matfrankland
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 15


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2010, 03:39:32 AM »

got next to no posts so decided to get dave to post this for me but just posting to confirm this isnt an epic little dave fish world grim
Logged
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 20728



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2010, 10:12:00 AM »

didn't someone on 2+2 do 50k hands in 24 hours a few months back?

If so, 100k in 168hrs seems reasonable. Still sick, but plenty doable.
Logged

@GreekStein on twitter.

Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
wallysnooper
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 85


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2010, 10:22:15 AM »

didn't someone on 2+2 do 50k hands in 24 hours a few months back?

If so, 100k in 168hrs seems reasonable. Still sick, but plenty doable.

Was 30k in 24 hours, and it turned out the guy cheated and got friends to dump to him near the end of the bet to show profit.
Logged
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 20728



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2010, 10:25:00 AM »

didn't someone on 2+2 do 50k hands in 24 hours a few months back?

If so, 100k in 168hrs seems reasonable. Still sick, but plenty doable.

Was 30k in 24 hours, and it turned out the guy cheated and got friends to dump to him near the end of the bet to show profit.

Was that the Chicago Joey one?


Anyway, I'll have $150 on at even money. Can ship tilt to an escrow if wanted but I'm happy if Dave vouches for you w/e
Logged

@GreekStein on twitter.

Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
DaveShoelace
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9165



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2010, 10:34:40 AM »

The hands themselves are doable, its the profit I think is tough as $2/$4 is a really tough level to be mass multi tabling when sleep deprived. I'll probably have $150.01 at evens if you do it.
Logged
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 20728



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 12, 2010, 10:45:40 AM »

Make mine $200 and then $50 increments above what Barry Carter tries to beat me by as long as his bet is booked.

If Flushy bets more, the same does NOT apply.
Logged

@GreekStein on twitter.

Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
wallysnooper
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 85


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 12, 2010, 12:16:17 PM »

I think were talking about same one, chicago joey had issues in the thread regarding the judges. Think the posters name who laid the bet was 'gary neville' and im pritty sure he was a british student.

From what ive heard about Frankie he will win this bet imo if it goes ahead.
Logged
paulhouk03
Cliqueless
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7652



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 12, 2010, 12:37:23 PM »

will he play on one site only or multiple sites?
Logged

Just me
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 12, 2010, 02:50:56 PM »

will he play on one site only or multiple sites?

He plays tilt almost exclusively but on stars as well, I imagine he'll stick to ftp, and then open stars tables whenever volume is lacking on ftp. Also knowing frankie Im pretty sure he'll be playing higher than 2/4 the majority of the prop wont be able to resist lol
Logged

paulhouk03
Cliqueless
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7652



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 12, 2010, 02:52:53 PM »

full ring or 6 max
Logged

Just me
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: October 12, 2010, 03:20:50 PM »

I think were talking about same one, chicago joey had issues in the thread regarding the judges. Think the posters name who laid the bet was 'gary neville' and im pritty sure he was a british student.

From what ive heard about Frankie he will win this bet imo if it goes ahead.

Chicago Joey did it at NL25 and was succesful.

Gary Neville was the guy who got exposed for getting his friends to dump, he had to be in profit at the end of the session and ended up like a buyin. Which was subsquently found to be dumped to him.

Logged
Whollyflush
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 686



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: October 12, 2010, 04:00:23 PM »

Having a bet on EV is pretty retarded. Poker is all about variance and thats why people wager. Theres also so much that happens at the tables regarding luck which can't be quantifable by EV. I'd bet  against if it was on profit/loss.

As it is im out!

Nnja Edit: Where do you intend to play these hands?
« Last Edit: October 12, 2010, 04:03:10 PM by Whollyflush » Logged

@whollyflush on twitter
grogheadflow
Probation
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: October 12, 2010, 04:22:28 PM »

I've already said I'd bet, but probably depends on a few things:

I think it should be actual $. 100k hands is plenty to slow the variance from your point of view, and less verifiable via PTR for those who don't know you as well.

Also, being able to vary the stakes is a big advantage. You could, say, start off at 5-10, run well the first 20k or 30k hands while fresh and then drop down to 2-4. Or run bad and jump to 10-20 and the odd 25-50 game running. I can see why you need more tables for volume reasons, but ATM there's like 30 400nl 6max games running on FT. It's 11am ET on a Tuesday. So, I think the stakes should be 400nl min to 600nl max.

My mate Chris is up betting ~$5k depending on T&C as well.

/ 2pence
Logged
Whollyflush
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 686



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: October 12, 2010, 04:35:15 PM »

Yeah i also thinks the stakes should be capped at 400-600nl. Theres plenty of games across stars/tilt for this.
Logged

@whollyflush on twitter
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.125 seconds with 19 queries.