Friday night stakeaments...

[outragous76]

dude that last hand is the sickness!

thought stars might have given you a break for at least 1 game!  UL!

[mondatoo]

Just waiting to hear back from everyone what they want to do before sorting things out,will let everyone know in next couple of days.Everyone so far seems pretty happy to add a couple $ each and play the same schedule so I'll probably do that if everyone else is ok with that,I'll work out the figs tmoro,cheers

[mondatoo]

I'm guessing those who've yet to respond will be up for doing the same schedule so the current % value is as follows:

Cos 20% $50.18
Dan 20% $50.18
Eso Krol 5% $12.55
Matt 10% $25.09
PM 25% $62.73
Simon G 10%$25.09
James 10% $25.09

So need to ship the following

Cos $82.38,I know he's in Ireland and will ship when he's back
Dan $16.10
Eso Krol $4.02
Matt $8.04
PM $20.10
Simon G $8.04
James $41.18,Tbf to him he said he was going to grimm me so I'm guessing that's still the case

I will play the session on Tuesday night.

[dan]

Ive shipped the $16.10 just mate

[EvilPie]

To be honest I'm not overly impressed with the schedule.

Most of it's ok but why have you got the $55 DNG and $20 cubed in there alongside $2.20 turbos?

Seems like too much of a spread and likely to lead to mistakes.

Any chance you could get rid of the smaller comps?

I know they don't cost much but they just seem pointless. You'd probably need to make top 5 in one of those to cover the stake. Hardly seems worth it.

13:00 $5.50 20k gtd
13:00 $22 12.5k gtd
13:15 $27.50 360cap 9k gtd
13:40 $22 6max 500cap 5k gtd
13:40 $2.20 Turbo 12k gtd
14:00 $11 40k gtd
14:15 $3.30r 60k gtd $21.30
14:15 $22 1r1a 35k gtd
14:20 $4.40 turbo 7.5k gtd
14:45 $2.20 6max 7.5k gtd
15:00 $5.50 turbo 20k gtd
15:00 $55 90k gtd
15:15 $11 20k gtd
16:00 $8.80 12k gtd
16:00 $11r 75k gtd $71

Get rid of the ones I've crossed out and you've got enough to play another $27.50 comp.

If you'd prefer to play loads of micro buy in huge field comps I'm fine with that but remove everything above the $8.80

If not can I have my 25 bucks back please. Thanks.

PS: Unlucky running in to that AA. Sickness.

[mondatoo]

To be honest I'm not overly impressed with the schedule.

Most of it's ok but why have you got the $55 DNG and $20 cubed in there alongside $2.20 turbos?

Seems like too much of a spread and likely to lead to mistakes.

Any chance you could get rid of the smaller comps?

I know they don't cost much but they just seem pointless. You'd probably need to make top 5 in one of those to cover the stake. Hardly seems worth it.

13:00 $5.50 20k gtd
13:00 $22 12.5k gtd
13:15 $27.50 360cap 9k gtd
13:40 $22 6max 500cap 5k gtd
13:40 $2.20 Turbo 12k gtd
14:00 $11 40k gtd
14:15 $3.30r 60k gtd $21.30
14:15 $22 1r1a 35k gtd
14:20 $4.40 turbo 7.5k gtd
14:45 $2.20 6max 7.5k gtd
15:00 $5.50 turbo 20k gtd
15:00 $55 90k gtd
15:15 $11 20k gtd
16:00 $8.80 12k gtd
16:00 $11r 75k gtd $71

Get rid of the ones I've crossed out and you've got enough to play another $27.50 comp.

If you'd prefer to play loads of micro buy in huge field comps I'm fine with that but remove everything above the $8.80

If not can I have my 25 bucks back please. Thanks.

PS: Unlucky running in to that AA. Sickness.

Not sure I'm seeing your point here Matt,all the lower buy in comps are there as it gives more chance of a bink ?? Obv the fields are huge but top end of prizes in the low buyin events pay well and I'm massively +ev in them so not sure why you want to reduce that by having me play less comps,ie I went deep in the $4 turbo before running JJ into AA 1st was 4k,surely it's better for stakers that I play more comps to give us a decent chance of binking.Also not sure where you think mistakes are going to come from,obviously mtt's are different to sngs but I'm used to 24 tabling 10 hours a day so haven't got much problem with 12 tabling mtt's.I will trfr your $25 back and someone else can have 10% if they like or I'll take it myself.

[EvilPie]

To be honest I'm not overly impressed with the schedule.

Most of it's ok but why have you got the $55 DNG and $20 cubed in there alongside $2.20 turbos?

Seems like too much of a spread and likely to lead to mistakes.

Any chance you could get rid of the smaller comps?

I know they don't cost much but they just seem pointless. You'd probably need to make top 5 in one of those to cover the stake. Hardly seems worth it.

13:00 $5.50 20k gtd
13:00 $22 12.5k gtd
13:15 $27.50 360cap 9k gtd
13:40 $22 6max 500cap 5k gtd
13:40 $2.20 Turbo 12k gtd
14:00 $11 40k gtd
14:15 $3.30r 60k gtd $21.30
14:15 $22 1r1a 35k gtd
14:20 $4.40 turbo 7.5k gtd
14:45 $2.20 6max 7.5k gtd
15:00 $5.50 turbo 20k gtd
15:00 $55 90k gtd
15:15 $11 20k gtd
16:00 $8.80 12k gtd
16:00 $11r 75k gtd $71

Get rid of the ones I've crossed out and you've got enough to play another $27.50 comp.

If you'd prefer to play loads of micro buy in huge field comps I'm fine with that but remove everything above the $8.80

If not can I have my 25 bucks back please. Thanks.

PS: Unlucky running in to that AA. Sickness.

Not sure I'm seeing your point here Matt,all the lower buy in comps are there as it gives more chance of a bink ?? Obv the fields are huge but top end of prizes in the low buyin events pay well and I'm massively +ev in them so not sure why you want to reduce that by having me play less comps,ie I went deep in the $4 turbo before running JJ into AA 1st was 4k,surely it's better for stakers that I play more comps to give us a decent chance of binking.Also not sure where you think mistakes are going to come from,obviously mtt's are different to sngs but I'm used to 24 tabling 10 hours a day so haven't got much problem with 12 tabling mtt's.I will trfr your $25 back and someone else can have 10% if they like or I'll take it myself.

So why not scrap the $55, $62 and $71 in favour of 42 $4.40 comps giving even more bink chances? You could even spread it over 2 or 3 nights.

Just seems a weird spread of comps. I'm not a regular mtt grinder so maybe I'm wrong but you're going to be up against radically different fields.

Playing 24x 45 mans is completely different. Every comp you play is exactly the same so you're sticking to the same formula which makes it easy.

Whatever anyway.

[mondatoo]

To be honest I'm not overly impressed with the schedule.

Most of it's ok but why have you got the $55 DNG and $20 cubed in there alongside $2.20 turbos?

Seems like too much of a spread and likely to lead to mistakes.

Any chance you could get rid of the smaller comps?

I know they don't cost much but they just seem pointless. You'd probably need to make top 5 in one of those to cover the stake. Hardly seems worth it.

13:00 $5.50 20k gtd
13:00 $22 12.5k gtd
13:15 $27.50 360cap 9k gtd
13:40 $22 6max 500cap 5k gtd
13:40 $2.20 Turbo 12k gtd
14:00 $11 40k gtd
14:15 $3.30r 60k gtd $21.30
14:15 $22 1r1a 35k gtd
14:20 $4.40 turbo 7.5k gtd
14:45 $2.20 6max 7.5k gtd
15:00 $5.50 turbo 20k gtd
15:00 $55 90k gtd
15:15 $11 20k gtd
16:00 $8.80 12k gtd
16:00 $11r 75k gtd $71

Get rid of the ones I've crossed out and you've got enough to play another $27.50 comp.

If you'd prefer to play loads of micro buy in huge field comps I'm fine with that but remove everything above the $8.80

If not can I have my 25 bucks back please. Thanks.

PS: Unlucky running in to that AA. Sickness.

Not sure I'm seeing your point here Matt,all the lower buy in comps are there as it gives more chance of a bink ?? Obv the fields are huge but top end of prizes in the low buyin events pay well and I'm massively +ev in them so not sure why you want to reduce that by having me play less comps,ie I went deep in the $4 turbo before running JJ into AA 1st was 4k,surely it's better for stakers that I play more comps to give us a decent chance of binking.Also not sure where you think mistakes are going to come from,obviously mtt's are different to sngs but I'm used to 24 tabling 10 hours a day so haven't got much problem with 12 tabling mtt's.I will trfr your $25 back and someone else can have 10% if they like or I'll take it myself.

So why not scrap the $55, $62 and $71 in favour of 42 $4.40 comps giving even more bink chances? You could even spread it over 2 or 3 nights.

Just seems a weird spread of comps. I'm not a regular mtt grinder so maybe I'm wrong but you're going to be up against radically different fields.

Playing 24x 45 mans is completely different. Every comp you play is exactly the same so you're sticking to the same formula which makes it easy.

Whatever anyway.

I agree with you on the whatever bit,I'll ship your $ back now,thanks for the stake.The higher buy in comps are there because a bink is worth a lot more,I could easily play the smaller buy in comps of my own roll but wouldn't think it would be that attractive to a staker to just have a stake in me in three events where variance is huge and it's a one off stake.

PS Got no problem with your comments,I'm a bit confused at why you took a % and then think it's wrong afterwards but meh,no biggie xx

[mondatoo]

To be honest I'm not overly impressed with the schedule.

Most of it's ok but why have you got the $55 DNG and $20 cubed in there alongside $2.20 turbos?

Seems like too much of a spread and likely to lead to mistakes.

Any chance you could get rid of the smaller comps?

I know they don't cost much but they just seem pointless. You'd probably need to make top 5 in one of those to cover the stake. Hardly seems worth it.

13:00 $5.50 20k gtd
13:00 $22 12.5k gtd
13:15 $27.50 360cap 9k gtd
13:40 $22 6max 500cap 5k gtd
13:40 $2.20 Turbo 12k gtd
14:00 $11 40k gtd
14:15 $3.30r 60k gtd $21.30
14:15 $22 1r1a 35k gtd
14:20 $4.40 turbo 7.5k gtd
14:45 $2.20 6max 7.5k gtd
15:00 $5.50 turbo 20k gtd
15:00 $55 90k gtd
15:15 $11 20k gtd
16:00 $8.80 12k gtd
16:00 $11r 75k gtd $71

Get rid of the ones I've crossed out and you've got enough to play another $27.50 comp.

If you'd prefer to play loads of micro buy in huge field comps I'm fine with that but remove everything above the $8.80

If not can I have my 25 bucks back please. Thanks.

PS: Unlucky running in to that AA. Sickness.

Not sure I'm seeing your point here Matt,all the lower buy in comps are there as it gives more chance of a bink ?? Obv the fields are huge but top end of prizes in the low buyin events pay well and I'm massively +ev in them so not sure why you want to reduce that by having me play less comps,ie I went deep in the $4 turbo before running JJ into AA 1st was 4k,surely it's better for stakers that I play more comps to give us a decent chance of binking.Also not sure where you think mistakes are going to come from,obviously mtt's are different to sngs but I'm used to 24 tabling 10 hours a day so haven't got much problem with 12 tabling mtt's.I will trfr your $25 back and someone else can have 10% if they like or I'll take it myself.

So why not scrap the $55, $62 and $71 in favour of 42 $4.40 comps giving even more bink chances? You could even spread it over 2 or 3 nights.

Just seems a weird spread of comps. I'm not a regular mtt grinder so maybe I'm wrong but you're going to be up against radically different fields.

Playing 24x 45 mans is completely different. Every comp you play is exactly the same so you're sticking to the same formula which makes it easy.

Whatever anyway.

I did also say playing 45mans was different but I'd be happier staking someone playing multiple mtt's who I knew was competent at multi-tabling.If you look through the comps to play on stars I pretty much pick every comp between 6pm and 9pm that is good value,I'm still struggling to see why it's bad for stakers that I include the lower buyin comps with bigger fields that gives us a better chance of making a profit.

[EvilPie]

I did also say playing 45mans was different but I'd be happier staking someone playing multiple mtt's who I knew was competent at multi-tabling.If you look through the comps to play on stars I pretty much pick every comp between 6pm and 9pm that is good value,I'm still struggling to see why it's bad for stakers that I include the lower buyin comps with bigger fields that gives us a better chance of making a profit.

What is it that makes them good value? There's no overlays on stars so I fail to see the difference between any 2 comps no matter what the buy in. Surely if anything the bigger buy in comps have to better value as they have more sat winners?

My point is that if you think the lower buy in comps with bigger fields give a better chance of making a profit why would you ever consider the $50 and bigger comps?

If you play the micro comps you have to get a bink to make any profit, if you play all comps of around the same level then 3 min cashes would pretty much get our money back to try again another day.

Maybe I'm being stupid, it's been known to happen before but not often where money's concerned but it just seems a bad idea having such a spread of buy ins.

[mondatoo]

I did also say playing 45mans was different but I'd be happier staking someone playing multiple mtt's who I knew was competent at multi-tabling.If you look through the comps to play on stars I pretty much pick every comp between 6pm and 9pm that is good value,I'm still struggling to see why it's bad for stakers that I include the lower buyin comps with bigger fields that gives us a better chance of making a profit.

What is it that makes them good value? There's no overlays on stars so I fail to see the difference between any 2 comps no matter what the buy in. Surely if anything the bigger buy in comps have to better value as they have more sat winners?

My point is that if you think the lower buy in comps with bigger fields give a better chance of making a profit why would you ever consider the $50 and bigger comps?

If you play the micro comps you have to get a bink to make any profit, if you play all comps of around the same level then 3 min cashes would pretty much get our money back to try again another day.

Maybe I'm being stupid, it's been known to happen before but not often where money's concerned but it just seems a bad idea having such a spread of buy ins.

I'm restricted by time so can't include later comps that are larger buy ins for one,I also doubt I'd be good value to stake in the 109fo or 109r or higher so imo instead of just putting a staking thread up for 5-6 $22-55 comps where stars has big gte's on I also include the lower buy in comps therefore we have a better chance of seeing a decent return.As I said already since I'm only offering a one off stake imo it's better for stakers that the lower buy in comps are there as if I only had 5-6 $22-55 due to the high variance there's a pretty high chance of 0 return whereas with all the other lower bi's I think this gives stakers a better chance of seeing a decent roi.

[paulhouk03]

Can I have the other 10% if its going?

[GreekStein]

lol ignore everything pie says. such a tittyhead

at the airport now...will be back this afternoon and ship then.

[mondatoo]

Can I have the other 10% if its going?

Already gone,sorry.

[EvilPie]

I agree with you on the whatever bit,I'll ship your $ back now,thanks for the stake.The higher buy in comps are there because a bink is worth a lot more,I could easily play the smaller buy in comps of my own roll but wouldn't think it would be that attractive to a staker to just have a stake in me in three events where variance is huge and it's a one off stake.

PS Got no problem with your comments,I'm a bit confused at why you took a % and then think it's wrong afterwards but meh,no biggie xx

I took it because I love you Raymondo.

I don't necessarily think it's wrong I just have a preference for sticking to similar buy in comps for a single session that's all.

Hope you bink one in my eye mate

GLGL