$6 45 man ship/fold

[roscopiko]

Ship or fold? or other??

Were 6/28

PokerStars Game #58140174827: Tournament #367889712, $6.00+$0.50 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2011/02/23 11:02:24 WET [2011/02/23 6:02:24 ET]
Table '367889712 3' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: FEKETE47 (2045 in chips)
Seat 2: roscopiko (5970 in chips)
Seat 3: brad352 (440 in chips)
Seat 4: DuRR99 (1669 in chips)
Seat 7: arminallin (1983 in chips)
Seat 8: joshproctor (2990 in chips) is sitting out
Seat 9: kobraprophet (2705 in chips)
joshproctor: posts small blind 100
kobraprophet: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to roscopiko [ ]
FEKETE47: folds
roscopiko: ?

[StuartHopkin]

Fold for me I think

[outragous76]

Its close (14bb effective) but i probs fold

[MC]

fold or min-raise/fold (except to short-stack obv)

fwiw it's not that close to a shove, shoving would be pretty bad with our chip stack

[TheRaise]

Pass.  Too early position to play 55 and we really dont want to be calling a reshove with it.

[mondatoo]

fold or min-raise/fold (except to short-stack obv)

fwiw it's not that close to a shove, shoving would be pretty bad with our chip stack

Obv not suggesting min raise/fold to anyone other than the BB surely ?

Not that I like it even vs BB but against the rest it would be terrible.

I agree this is a fold though, I'd say 88+ AQs+

[MC]

Obv not suggesting min raise/fold to anyone other than the BB surely ?

Not that I like it even vs BB but against the rest it would be terrible.

I agree this is a fold though, I'd say 88+ AQs+

I'm suggesting min-raise/fold is an option and we would only call the 440 stack.

Personally I'm shoving 0% of my range in this spot.

[Longy]

Snap fold.

I am not shoving anything here fwiw, I know a lot of regs would.

[roscopiko]

cheers for the replys

obv I snap shipped just based on the stacks behind me to act then realised it was prolly pretty shit.

[Rupert]

Snap fold.

I am not shoving anything here fwiw, I know a lot of regs would.

are u raise folding anything here out of interest

[Longy]

Snap fold.

I am not shoving anything here fwiw, I know a lot of regs would.

are u raise folding anything here out of interest

Not much possibly the bottom of my range if I have a read*.

* I normally have a reasonable hud sample on 50%+ of the field in 45's

[mondatoo]

Obv not suggesting min raise/fold to anyone other than the BB surely ?

Not that I like it even vs BB but against the rest it would be terrible.

I agree this is a fold though, I'd say 88+ AQs+

I'm suggesting min-raise/fold is an option and we would only call the 440 stack.

Personally I'm shoving 0% of my range in this spot.

I hate min-raise folding 8-9bbs effective. I'd shove AK

[MC]

Obv not suggesting min raise/fold to anyone other than the BB surely ?

Not that I like it even vs BB but against the rest it would be terrible.

I agree this is a fold though, I'd say 88+ AQs+

I'm suggesting min-raise/fold is an option and we would only call the 440 stack.

Personally I'm shoving 0% of my range in this spot.

I hate min-raise folding 8-9bbs effective. I'd shove AK

[  ] this is 8-9bbs effective

[mondatoo]

Obv not suggesting min raise/fold to anyone other than the BB surely ?

Not that I like it even vs BB but against the rest it would be terrible.

I agree this is a fold though, I'd say 88+ AQs+

I'm suggesting min-raise/fold is an option and we would only call the 440 stack.

Personally I'm shoving 0% of my range in this spot.

I hate min-raise folding 8-9bbs effective. I'd shove AK

[  ] this is 8-9bbs effective

So when you say only call the 440 stack are you not including  Seat 4: DuRR99 (1669 in chips) ??

[MC]

Sigh, just fold pre, it's easier